The Rise of New Christianity as Pilgrimage to Jew-Worship
All religions, creeds, and ideologies are open to interpretation, and what goes for snowflakes goes for interpretations as well, i.e. no two are exactly alike. Every person has his/her own ‘take’ on what is holy, true, and/or just. This was certainly the case with communism, with Leninism deviating from Marxism, Stalinism deviating from Leninism, Maoism deviating from Stalinism, and so on, with each national government putting their unique stamp on a universal ideology. Catholicism gained supremacy by eradicating the Arian ‘heresy’, and Heaven knows Catholics and Protestants spilled a lot of blood until they settled for compromise lest both sides succumb to mutual destruction. Then, it’s hardly surprising that there has never been a single correct version of Christianity, even though just about every variation of Christianity has emphasized the primacy of Jesus Christ as the embodiment of its spiritual essence; however, the recent degeneration of Christianity into a cult of either sodomy-worship or Negrolatry could be deemed a fundamental deviation from or desecration of the core tenets of Christianity.
The two manifestations of Christianity addressed here are diametrically opposed in their perspective on the Jews within the larger framework of Judeo/Christian relations. Now, few things need to be clarified. By ‘Christianity’, it is the religion or mythology at stake here. As for the historical Jesus and who the real Apostles might have been, I have no idea. Some have speculated that Jesus was merely a Jewish reformer who had minor troubles with the Jewish authority and was killed by the Romans for reasons unrelated to Jewish affairs. Others believe He was a genuine revolutionary in spirituality and philosophy. Some highly educated people, like Steven Pinker, believe Jesus never existed and was made out of whole cloth from fragments of surrounding myths of the time. One thing for sure, Jews through the ages have cursed the name of Jesus, but one wonders if the animus was toward the historical Jesus or the myth spun around him by the Jewish heretics(who comprised the Early Christians) and the unholy goy converts.
Let the archaeologists debate the actual history surrounding the figure of Jesus and let the theologians pontificate on the details of dogma. Of interest here is how the story and the teachings of Jesus, along with the narratives and interpretations of them by the supposed Apostles, determined the overall direction of the emerging faith. Having failed to gain traction among the Jews themselves, Christianity obviously developed as a universal-conversionary religion reaching out to goyim.
Thus, it took shape as a religion moving AWAY from Jews, or more accurately a religion about ‘heretical’, ‘reformist’, or ‘enlightened’ Jews moving away from what seemed to them as an increasingly ossified, corrupt, and/or compromised faith. Given that the Early Christians were virtually all Jews, they had no need for a spiritual bridge with Jewishdom. If anything, they were convinced(according to Christian mythos and narrative) of the failure and betrayal of Judaism and of the need for a new covenant, one that would rejuvenate the spiritual vitality of what God had promised to the righteous. They increasingly sensed in Jewish culture and community the failure of prophecy due to either an excessively rigid immersion in dogma of unquestioned texts or a shamelessly cynical opportunism in relation to unholy pagans, prioritizing profit and worldly gain over spiritual matters. Given these convictions, Christianity evolved to settle accounts with both sets of Jews: The pigheaded arch-religious types closed to new prophecies and the materialist traitors who sold their souls and adopted pagan ways to grow rich under Roman hegemony.
Ultimately, having failed to make any real impact on the Jewish community itself, the Early Christians increasingly moved away from Judaism, with Apostle Paul finalizing the break with his concept of the New Covenant by way of Jesus Christ and accessible to all comers.
The notion of Judeo/Christian is contentious given the myriad ways one can interpret the relational dynamic between the two religions. Clearly, Christianity grew out of Judaism. In this sense, one can speak of a Judeo-to-Christian continuity. But, Christianity also emerged and developed as a break from and rebellion to Judaism, in which case it’s been a matter of Christian-against-Judean(and Judeo-against-Christian) dynamic.
After all, there’s no guarantee that the follower will respect and obey the antecedent. Much of Roman Civilization was a continuation of the Greek tradition, but the Romans also conquered and dominated the Greeks. The notion of ‘Anglo-American’ acknowledges America’s cultural and historical debt to English civilization, but the US also defined itself in revolutionary opposition to the British Empire, a matter only resolved through a long bloody war. The ancients surely understood this: The Olympians descended from the Titans but overthrew them just the same, hardly dwelling on ‘Titano-Olympian’ links.
Islam is inconceivable without Judaism and Christianity as its spiritual ancestors, and in this sense one might characterize Muslim civilization as Judeo-Christo-Islamic. But Islam also developed as a defiant reinterpretation of the Holy Texts, insisting that the final great prophet Muhammad corrected the record for all time. And Protestantism wouldn’t exist without Catholicism, but we don’t hear much about the Catholo-Protestant tradition because, to put in simply, Protestantism, as its name denotes, emerged in opposition to the failures and betrayals of the Catholic Church.
As for power politics in the US, it can broadly be described as Anglo-Judaean given that only two ethnic groups have held overwhelming dominance. From the inception of the republic to the late 20th century, Anglo-Americans held most of the cards, but then, Jews gained the upper hand as the Boomer generation remade the institutions and industries. Does this mean that the Anglo-to-Jewish transition of power has been smooth and appreciative? Actually, it’s been quite hostile and disruptive in many spheres of ideas, culture, and foreign policy. Jewish ruling elites, far from expressing gratitude to the Anglo-Americans who laid down and developed the foundations of American civilization, have done much to subvert, deconstruct, and invalidate American History. No matter how much white goy brownnosers may spin the nature of the Anglo-Judaean relations as warm and fuzzy, the Jewish usurpers see it as a done deal of the rightful master race(of Jews) deservedly ruling over inferior goyim whose primary purpose in life is to appease and obey the Jews. (And it’s no different in Great Britain where a similar power shift has taken place, with Anglo elites serving essentially as pliable dogs to their Jewish masters.)
So, if ‘Anglo-Judaean’ doesn’t necessarily imply mutual respect and equal regard between the two groups, then the same goes for ‘Judeo-Christian’, and indeed, the Jewish-Christian relations through the ages have been contentious and troubled, no less than Christo-Islamic ones(or Catholo-Protestant ones).
If Muslims posed an external spiritual threat to Christendom, Jews posed an internal spiritual threat, arguably a bigger one. Whereas it was clear as day that Islam and Christianity didn’t see eye to eye and confronted one another with massive armies, the Jews, lacking numbers and military might of their own, played along as compliant and law-abiding members of a tiny minority, not only in the Christian world but in the Islamic one as well, sometimes playing both sides against each other(which continues to this day). Thus, even though Jews were hostile to Christians and Muslims alike, they were seen as less of a threat by both sides and, if anything, were even prized and recruited as money-lenders. Whereas Christians and Muslims openly brandished their swords against the other, Jews hid their daggers under their clothes and worked on the art of the long game.
Also, despite trepidations about Jews among Christians and Muslims, the two great universal faiths paid respect to the Jewish tradition as foundational to the prophecies of Jesus and Muhammad. In this, Christians and Muslims squeezed Jewishness into their own preferred narratives, i.e. they projected their own universalist light onto Jewishness than learn to see it in its own unique darkness. Thus, they focused on the links between the Old Testament and the New Testament(or the Koran), all the while ignoring that Judaism took off in a whole new direction with the Talmud, a kind of ‘new testament’ for Jews Only.
This problem continues to this day, especially with so-called Christian Zionists emphasizing the Tanakh as the prophetic precursor of the New Testament, all the while ignoring Talmud’s place in Jewish consciousness. On the occasion that Western elites invoke the Talmud, it’s in the most generic and ignorant terms as a tome of wisdom, kindness, and generosity, when its essence is inconceivable minus the deep-seated antipathy toward the universalization of Jewish spirituality via Christianity and then later Islam. (It’d be like pretending MEIN KAMPF is just some harmless expression of German patriotism.) Far from a vision of unifying humanity via shared reverence for the one true God, the Talmud is about how to hoard, manipulate, and even corrupt Jewish spirituality to keep the Tribe separate from inferior, subhuman, and beastly goyim. It’s less about submitting to God’s will than making God succumb to Jewish wishes.
Paradoxically, it’s often the case that two entities that have more in common have more reasons to fight one another. As they co-exist in a specific sphere or realm and compete for the same or similar prizes, they are more likely to clash with one another. It’s like lions and hyenas, both pack animals hunting for big game. Lions don’t care what killer whales do and vice versa, but lions and hyenas stalk the same terrain for the same game. Swimmers in their watery realm don’t compete with runners on the track.
Then, it’s hardly surprising that Muslims and Hindus were more likely to peacefully co-exist(notwithstanding the periods of real inter-faith violence) than Muslims and Christians. Islam and Hinduism are so profoundly unlike that they inhabit entirely different universes. One may try to totally destroy the other, but failing that, one must learn to tolerate the other as an entirely different species of belief.
In contrast, Christianity and Islam have much in common as both derive from Judaic sources. This was even truer between Catholics and Protestants and, of course, among various sects of Islam, the Sunnis and Shias being the two biggest. No wonder then they fought so many bloody wars over competing interpretations. Likewise, the Soviet Union was more likely to get along with a country with an entirely different ideology than with communist China with its own spin on Marxism(that posed a challenge to the Moscow Line). And before that, Stalinism vs Trotskyism was a winner-takes-all struggle.
Then, it’s no wonder that Jews get along easier with Hindus than with Christians and Muslims who compete with Jews over Biblical interpretations and the meaning of Judeo/Christian/Muslim relations. So, while white Christian Zionists may comfort themselves that the notion of ‘Judeo-Christian’ binds the two communities together, Jews view Christianism as a spiritual, narrative, and ideological threat to the favored Jewish interpretation of things. What Hindus believe has no bearing on Judaism or Jewishness, whereas what Christians believe, pro-Jewish or anti-Jewish, does compete with the Jewish perspective.
Anti-Jewish Christians have maintained that the Jews killed Christ, and the only way Jews can be saved is by conversion. But even pro-Jewish Christians pose a threat to the Jewish Worldview as they maintain that Christianity is the rightful and righteous fulfilment of Jewish prophecy, a conviction that is deeply offensive to Jews who regard their Covenant as the true one and regard Jesus as an errant heretic(or worse) and His followers a bunch of dimwit goyim who aren’t worthy to untie the shoelaces of the Chosen.
Given these factors, the gushing Christian-Zionist insistence on the supposed sanctity of the Judeo-Christian tradition tends to emphasize only the spiritual links between the two faiths while ignoring or downplaying the ruptures, all the more problematic as Jews/Zionists themselves continue to insist on their uniqueness and barely conceal their contempt for Christian goyim.
Given that the Jewish Will have proven to be stronger than the White/Christian Will, the idea of ‘Judeo-Christian’, especially in the American cultural-spiritual context, no longer even means that the Jewish tradition culminated in the triumph of Christianity as the final and greatest prophecy of all time; after all, such a view, while paying a debt of gratitude to Judaism, renders it secondary to Christianity, i.e. the main purpose of Judaism in God’s grand design was to clear the path for Jesus Christ and His ultimate faith. Jewish ego doesn’t like to play second fiddle to anything. As Harold Bloom once rebutted on the Charlie Rose Show, what is called the ‘Old Testament’ is really the ORIGINAL Testament, perhaps a sly suggestion that what’s called the ‘New Testament’ is secondary, a mere addendum to the real thing. If a secular Jew like Harold Bloom feels that way, imagine what religious or ethno-supremacist Jews feel about the idea of ‘Judeo-Christian’.
Fast-forward to here and now, and Jews have become so highly prized in the US that a distinction has emerged between the Old Judeo-Christian and the New Judeo-Christian, with the former acknowledging the crucial Jewish role in the emergence of Christianity as the greater faith while the latter revises the relation in terms more favorable to the Jews, i.e. Jews are the ultimate race, the Chosen by God, and the primary purpose of Christians is to ‘bless the Jews’ because otherwise they will be cursed by God. In other words, the New Judeo-Christian view owes more to Talmudian racial supremacism than to Torahean or Tanakhian ‘prophecism’. Thus, ‘Judeo-Christian’ today is essentially Christo-Talmudian and should be labeled as such. It’s not about Judaism leading to Christianity but Christians being led to bow down at the feet of Netanyahu(who’s said to be secular) and tribal-supremacist rabbis.
In the grand arc of history, Christianity has gone from a movement away from Jews to the movement toward Jews. It went from the exodus of ‘heretical’ Jews from Judaism & the Jewish community to the quasi-Aliyah of zealous goy Christians(mostly white cuck-maggots) toward the Jewish community as the object of worship. It’s about whites(as Christo-Talmudists) venerating Jews as the very embodiment of God and holiness. For such Christians, it’s never enough to admire the great Jews of myth and history, like Moses or Albert Einstein, as they believe it’s the calling of every Christian(especially if white) to venerate ALL Jews, even crooks, gangsters, and perverts, simply on account of the holy-chosen blood running through their veins. Even though most Christo-Talmudists rely on the Old and New Testaments as the basis of their spiritual knowledge and remain ignorant of the Talmud, the attitudes they’ve unconsciously imbibed over the years in Jewish-ascendant America derive more from Talmud that has insidiously spread its demonic tendrils throughout the Western World by the promotion of Jewish Supremacism in all its forms. ‘Neoconservatism’, especially originating from the worldview of Leo Strauss, is essentially secular Talmudism.
Even admonitions against ‘antisemitism’, though ostensibly sounding anti-supremacist, bolsters Jewish Supremacism as the brouhaha implies that it’s always and unconditionally wrong to find something to criticize and condemn in Jewish culture and community. It turns criticism of Jews into something akin to blasphemy against God. Secularize and racialize, “Don’t you know God is perfect and cannot be questioned by lowly humans?” and you get, “Don’t you know Jews are perfect and cannot be questioned by lowly goyim?”
And plenty of white Christo-Talmudist cuck-maggots are completely with the program. How else can one explain Mike Huckabee’s ritualistic anal-licking of Jonathan Pollard the traitor? According to idiots like Cucky-Hucky, never mind what Pollard did to the US, which ideally should be a materialist tributary to Holy Israel as the spiritual capital of the world. Since Pollard betrayed the US in service to Israel, it was entirely justified because the needs of Israel take primacy over the needs of the US. If in the Biblical worldview, it is justified to betray a king in the higher service to God, then it is justified to betray or disobey goy authority in service to the higher authority of the Jews, the Chosen of God. The fact that Huckabee feels justified in anal-licking Pollard(with Trump’s full approval, by the way) is all you need to know about the current power dynamics in the Western World. (Perhaps, Trump hopes Huckabee’ super-cuckery will make his own cuckery seem moderate by comparison.)
This worship of Jews is a kind of ‘ethnolatry’, which goes far beyond ‘ethnophilia’. Anglophiles have a special fascination for English things, and Japanophiles for Japanese things. And of course, there’s no lack of Grecophiles.
But neither Anglophilia, Japanophilia, or Grecophilia is about worshiping a people as spiritually holier or racially superior. It’s an interest in arts, culture, history, sensibility, and etc. of a particular people/culture. One could love English things but still regard English people as members of the human race, no better or worse than the others.
Most probably, the Greeks have contributed more to Western Civilization than any other people. Their mythology, philosophy, math & logic, literature & drama, arts & architecture, and etc. have universally been appreciated as the foundations of what later came to fruition across Europe and beyond. So, all of humanity owe a great debt to the Greeks. But, such an appreciation hardly serves as a rationale for everyone to ‘bless the Greeks’, prioritize the interests of the Greek nation, idolize every Greek man-woman-child, unconditionally venerate Greeks as an ethnic group, wage wars for the Greeks, appease the Greeks at every turn, and fall all over one another in competition of who can best anal-lick a Greek. We still regard Greeks as people just like us. It’s what they did that amazes us, not what they are. Some Greeks are surely noble of mind while others are ignoble. Some Greeks are honest, some not so much. Greeks are sometimes right, sometimes wrong. We praise them at times, we rebuke them at times.
In other words, their illustrious past and seminal influences are no grounds for current and future Greeks to rest on their laurels and throw their weight around, no grounds for us to get on our knees and anal-lick them. Our admiration of Greek contribution to history doesn’t translate into a blind veneration of ethno-Greeks and unconditional endorsement of whatever they do.
Likewise, the outsized contributions to music, philosophy, and science by the Germans don’t oblige us to idolize them as our eternal superiors. Granted, Adolf Hitler’s National Socialism conceived of an ideology that elevated the ‘Aryans’ to godlike status with Nietzschean overtones, but it was rejected by most of humanity and besides, history since has never lacked for reminders that such supremacist mentality was the source of great woes unleashed by World War II. Even if Germany did produce many great men in various endeavors, the fact remains that the average German through the ages was just a Regular Joe(or Jerry). Also, even genuine greatness doesn’t excuse immorality and crimes against humanity. Roman Polanski is a great film director but also a pervert deserving to face justice. A great scientist or artist can be a lowlife son-of-a-bitch. The whole Epstein scandal is a chilling reminder of the dangers of vain elitism run amok, an attitude that a certain ‘gifted’ segment of the population can live by their own rules.
Most people are sensible when it comes to virtually all nations and cultures. We admire Greek heritage but don’t see every Greek as special or ‘better than us’. We appreciate German culture but also know of the great evils committed by the German people. We can acknowledge much that is great about China but also disdain certain aspects of its culture and history. We’re awed by the grandeur of the Roman Empire but also appalled by the brutality and repulsed by the decadence that infested its elites.
We can admire the talents of a great actor, writer, athlete, or businessman but also separate the pros from the cons. O.J. Simpson was undoubtedly a great football player, but he was also a deranged murderer. Granted, there are celebrity cultists who mindlessly rationalize or defend any transgression by their ‘heroes’ or ‘heroines’, and perhaps their mentality offers a glimpse into the mind of Christian Zionists(or Christo-Talmudists).
Still, there’s a difference between quasi-pagan cult of celebrity(or idol-worship) and the aura of sanctity pervasive in the veneration of Jews. Fans of Michael Jackson were simply star-stuck idiots during his trials. In contrast, there’s a delusion of holiness in the reverence that gushes from the mouths of goyim in their worship of Jews. Thus, Jew-Worship or ‘Zionacity’ has both the aspects of supremacist Nazism and spiritual dogmatism.
https://iol.co.za/news/opinion/2025-06-23-zionacity-the-audacity-of-eternal-victimhood/
Like Hitlerian-Himmlerian Nazism, Jew-Worship is fueled by a sense of awe, both Jewish self-awe and the goy awe of the Jews; it’s rather like Ron Jeremy sucking his own cock and then goyim sucking it as well. Just like many Non-Germans around the world were so impressed with German feats and achievements that they rather welcomed a German-dominated world order(and even adopted its racial hierarchy even if they themselves were ranked as inferior), many(indeed many more) goyim today look up to the Jews as the rightful master race on the basis of Jewish mastery of finance, science & technology, medicine, media, arts & culture, and the power of ‘prophecy’.
Charles Murray’s article on Jewish Genius in THE COMMENTARY magazine ended with the closing remarks that Jews are indeed the Chosen People. It was half-joking, which still means it was half-serious; or the embarrassing obsequiousness was tempered with humor.
Such pronouncements might be called the ‘Ramses Realization’. In Cecil B. DeMille’s TEN COMMANDMENTS, after a series of calamities visited upon the Egyptians by the God of the Jews, Yul Brynner’s Pharaoh finally concludes, “His God IS God.” For the intellectually inclined, Jewish Intellect IS Intellect. For the materialistically minded, Jewish Wealth IS Wealth. For the imperialistically minded, Jewish Power IS Power.
Even though supremacism seems at odds with universalism, the two have long been joined at the hip, indeed more often than not, though Jews took it to another level. Whereas Christianity, Islam, and Communism commands that all within the community are equal in worth and dignity on the basis of shared credo, a more sophisticated imperialism proselytizes that hierarchy and inequality are integral to cosmic justice. Thus, the British Empire went to some lengths to convince its subject peoples(as well as itself) that imperialism was justified in sharing the light of civilization with all the world. Sure, the Anglo race was innately better than other peoples, but it sought global mastery not to exploit its subjects but to lift them up. Slavery in the American South also had a moral component, one that even affected the minds of blacks as well: True, whites were masters and blacks were slaves, but it was for the better of both communities as blacks on their own, as in time immemorial in Africa, would likely revert to wild-ass bunnery without the firm hand of white rule. Thus, slavery was given a paternalistic sheen, with kindly white parents taking care of black ‘chillun’ who were unfit to be free. It was an imperialism with a moral twist, one arguing that racial hierarchy was actually a just arrangement for both parties.
A similar logic is at the heart of capitalism in its defense of class inequality as the price for innovation and progress, which eventually benefits all classes despite the inequality because the pie gets bigger for everyone. Defenders of white rule in Rhodesia/Zimbabwe and Apartheid in South Africa made similar arguments, i.e. while the system may outwardly seem unfair, blacks do better if the more intelligent and capable whites are in charge.
Of course, there is a kernel of truth in what might be called ‘hierarchical universalism’, a fusion of privilege-ism and justice-ism, which sets it apart from iron-fisted supremacism that says might-is-right and the powerful may do as it pleases, the way of the Aztecs to its hapless neighbors. Christianity, Islam, and communism aren’t entirely egalitarian-universalist as each favors its community over others, e.g. historically, Muslims enjoyed advantages and privileges denied to Christians, Jews, and others within the order.
Still, theoretically at least, anyone can convert to Islam as the one true faith and become equal with all other Muslims; and the same logic animated Christianity and communism. All who accept Jesus are brothers in Christ; all who espouse Marxism are comrades. Only secular humanism believes all peoples, regardless of race, color, or creed, should be treated with equal dignity and entitled to the same set of human rights.
In practice, however, most forms of universalism have been hierarchical in one way or another. The revolutionary communist world looked to Moscow as the Red Vatican with little tolerance for ideology heresy. And the so-called ‘Free World’ has been about the US-as-superpower dictating terms to supposedly ‘free’ and ‘democratic’ nations.
Perhaps, the very nature of power dynamics abhors universal-egalitarianism, as was the case with the Hebrews who tried to live as equals but then decided they needed a king, first of whom was Saul. Asian-Indian Hindus, unable to coalesce into a viable power across vast territories, ceded authority to Muslim rulers, later replaced by British rulers. In a way, it was humiliating and degrading to Hindu pride and honor, but many Hindus collaborated with what seemed a superior breed of rulers possessed with iron will, something lacking in otherworldly Hindus and their yogic ways. Most peoples and cultures, especially with the advent of complex agriculture, have been passive-resigned-directionless than active-assertive-aggressive, just like most people, even in societies grounded in democratic-egalitarian ethos, prefer to be followers than leaders, copiers than innovators.
Then, it’s understandable why National Socialist Germany gained hegemonic influence over much of Europe. Of course, in the post-war landscape most Europeans preferred the narrative of victimhood than collaboration, but when the Germans were riding high and on the verger of total victory over the Soviet Union, many willingly acceded to the inevitability of a German-dominated Eurosphere, hardly different from the French women who ran into the arms of conquering German soldiers. Back then, even a good number of swarthy whites in Southern Europe and Latin America entertained the ‘Aryan’ theory that the Nordic race was the optimal creation of evolution. As long as they themselves were given a place in the ‘Aryan’-dominated Order, albeit playing second-fiddle, they could acquiesce to the authority of the rightful master race. Even some Jews were so enamored of National Socialism(despite its antisemitism) that they pined for a junior partner role in the seemingly invincible march of German might.
Arguably, the only people who sincerely opted for a genuinely universal-egalitarian system were whites in the US and across Europe(including Russia) in the post-World-War II era, especially with the dissolution of empires, the centrality of humanist ethos(shared by communism), Civil Rights Movement in America, and the emerging consensus that there’s nothing worse than ‘racism’(oft associated with ‘antisemitism’). Therefore, a concerted effort was made to demote whiteness from a place of special prestige and privilege.
But then, what eventually came of such idealism? A new order in which all groups were equally respected and heard? No, as if the good-will white experiment was a repudiation of(and even a crime against) the nature-of-power itself, the result was a new form of hierarchical-universalism with Jews on top. Ironically, Jews had been the most insistent on whites mending their ‘racist’ and ‘white supremacist’ ways, and white reform was as much the result of outside pressure(from pushy Jews and angry blacks) as of inner reflection.
However, once whites pledged to correct their ways and accept all as equals, even going so far as to change immigration laws that had historically favored Europeans, Jews leapt to the fore as the rightful masters over the vast spheres of American influence. Thus, Jews betrayed what they’d ostensibly struggled for, a better world without ‘racism’ and ethno-supremacism.
But, even more outrageous was that whites all too readily betrayed their supposed chance at redemption by accepting the supremacism of the Jews, i.e. whites traded one form of supremacism, their own, for another, that of Jews.
In this light, the great socio-political transformation of the post-war era can be summarized in two ways: (1) There was a sincere effort by all Americans, especially whites under pressure from Jews and blacks, to transform the United States into a more equal, just, and fair union, but for whatever reasons, the noble experiment failed as the result of excessive power that redirected American energies toward neo-imperialism that reignited supremacist tendencies.
(2) The whole transformation was essentially a Jewish Power play to dethrone white dominance so that Jews could take over as the new overlords. Furthermore, the ‘anti-racist’ themes of the movement served as convenient smoke-and-mirrors for Jewish supremacism, i.e. even as Jews took over as the new masters, they always invoked ‘white supremacism’ to maintain the impression that society was still hard at work in wrestling with inequities, all of which could be traced back to ‘systemic racism’ of White America.
And so, Jewish Zio-Nazism could operate covertly under the external theatrics of ‘progressive’ Jews working with blacks, homos, diversity, and ‘good whites’(craven brownnosing cucks and guilt-ridden do-goody ‘wiberals’); and even the far-right genocidal enterprise of Zionism could be spun as a desperate struggle against ‘antisemitism’. In other words, even as Jews acted like Nazis toward the Palestinians, the memory of Anne Frank could forever be invoked to paint Jews as defending themselves in the spirit of ‘Never Again’.
At any rate, the Jewish vision of hierarcho-universalism(or supremacist-universalism) has been realized and animates the current West(and its satrapies). Instead of an Anglo-dominant or Germano-‘Aryan’-dominant world order, we have a Jewish-dominant order in which much of the world has resigned itself to global Jewish supremacy, even accepting it as deserving and/or holy.
Libertarian types obsessed with meritocracy believe that Jews(or Jewish Individuals), being the smartest and most ambitious, have deservedly earned their position of dominance over much of humanity. If libertarians focus on the success of Jews as individuals, another school of thought, focused on group genetics, sees Jews in general as the superior race for their higher IQ and basketful of Nobel Prizes.
While ‘racism’ is generally defined as believing one’s own racial or ethnic group to be superior, other racial thinkers aren’t so ethno-centric, thereby willing to accept that OTHER races may be superior, which can lead to servile attitudes toward the Other. There was an aspect of this among Non-‘Aryans’ who admired the Germans as godlike ubermensch, indeed were even flattered to be flunkies of the Hitlerian empire. Poles, for instance, were deemed as inferior ‘Aryans’, and certain Polacks collaborated as lesser-‘Aryan’ sidekicks; and such attitude is still found among Ukrainians with Nazi fetishism.
Today, a similar attitude is found among craven brownnosing white cucks who regard Jews as the superior race. As fanboys and fangirls, they believe that Jews exemplify awesomeness itself, and it’s the divine and/or evolutionary duty of goyim to be at the beck and call of their Zionic masters. Just look how the likes of Tom Cotton and Mike Pompeo light up in the presence of Jews. They’re like dogs greeting their master who knows best. In the white cuck-dog’s eyes, Jews are born to command, whites are born to obey.
Unlike the ‘racism’ of ‘white supremacism’ where whites put themselves at the center, this other-directed ‘racism’ is about regarding another group as superior. The arc of American racial and ethnic relations hasn’t really been about ‘racist’ ‘white supremacists’ abandoning their bigotry and chauvinism in favor of equality. Rather, it’s been about white Americans realizing that blacks are better at sports & rhythm and that Jews are better at mental tricks & money-making, and therefore lionizing blacks and Jews as the REAL superior races. Such a shift in outlook has affected not only the white mind but the black and Jewish minds as well. After several decades of adulation from the white community, blacks feel entitled to all the bling in the world, griping that not all Negroes be ‘kangz’ and shit like NBA players and millionaire rappers. And Jews have grown so accustomed to white submission and obeisance that they expect whites to just do as told and shut up.
(People like Kevin MacDonald argue that Jews won because they act as a group whereas whites act as individuals, but this overlooks the fact that group dynamics can be servile than assertive. Wolves behave as a pack to hunt and kill, but sheep behave as a herd to follow and submit. Both are examples of group-action. Thus, the reality is less about Jewish group-think vs white individuality than about weasel-like predatory group-think among Jews vs sheep-like prey group-think among whites.) Jews like Mark Levin and Ben Shapiro are outraged that there are still some whites who express doubts about any Jewish-Zionist imperative. They get incensed over the faintest whiff of white agency and autonomy, the white will to think for itself and not always endorse whatever Jews demand.
There are so many social and political manifestations of black supremacism and Jewish supremacism(largely enabled by white cuckery and other-directed ‘racism’), but many remain blind to the reality(that ‘racism’ is alive and well in America) because of the victim narratives woven through black and Jewish historiographies. So, every new elevation of blackness via Negrolatry is rationalized as ‘progress’ toward racial justice(as if the themes of the Civil Rights Movement are relevant to current realities). And every act of Jewish supremacism is spun as yet another existential struggle against ‘antisemitism’. Jews destroyed Palestine and treated native Arab folks like dirt, but any resistance on the part of Palestinians is demonized as ‘terrorism’ against poor poor Jews who are supposedly a bunch of Anne Franks.
The brazenness of Jewish Supremacists and the cravenness of white submissivists are now out in the open for all to see. Some Jews now fly so high on their megalomaniacal fumes that their chutzpah is on auto-pilot: “We are the masters of the universe” or “goyim are cattle whose only purpose is to serve us.” And so many goyim are so enamored of Jewish intelligence, wealth, and power that they feel honored to serve and obey the chosen-master-race. Whether it’s based on the number of Nobel Prizes, disproportionate number of Jewish billionaires on the Forbes list, percentage of Jewish donations to political parties & various institutions, array of head-trophies of so-called ‘Anti-Semites’(such as Joseph Sobran, Patrick Buchanan, Mel Gibson, Norman Finkelstein, Marjorie Taylor Greene, and etc.), or domination of the media, a whole lot of goyim are gobsmacked by the extent of Jewish control and have doggedly resigned themselves to serving the true master race.
But then, not everyone, Jew or goy, feels the same way. Many Jews believe the justification for their dominance must be moralistic or at least justice-based. They fear that excessive Jewish arrogance will produce a backlash. After all, not all goyim are Christo-Talmudists like Mike Huckabee the Cuckabee or Jewish-IQ-fetishizing minions of the HBD cult. Not all goyim are hapless dogs and brownnosing flunkies. Therefore, the more cautious Jews insist on a Jewish Power that is(or at least appears to be) based on right-is-might than might-is-right.
And this is where Jewish victimology does its tricks. Via tireless invocations of the history of ‘antisemitism’, various Jewish groups like ADL and AIPAC are hard at work in associating any opposition to Jewish influence and/or Zionist behavior to a dark and diabolical pool of ‘antisemitism’, a moral panic that would have us believe that goyim of various stripes through the ages were infected with a pathological animus against Jews with zero justification in fact or logic.
Apparently, Jews were always good and innocent, but these mentally challenged and soul-diseased ‘Anti-Semites’ simply couldn’t help but periodically succumb to the Jew-Hate flu and go wild and crazy, causing harm to wise, kindly, and decent Jewish folks, the kind with the personality traits of Alan Dershowitz, Howard Stern, Bill Maher, Mark Levin, Adam Schiff, Sarah Silverman, Stephen Miller, Jeffrey Epstein, Randy Fine, John Podhoretz, Bari Weiss, Noam Chomsky, and etc.
When the entirety of Jewish-Goy History is presented in terms of Innocent Jews set upon by Irrational Goyim, of course the moral advantage has been with the Jews, especially after World War II.
Now, given that goyim usually had the advantage in numbers, Jews found themselves vulnerable in times of violence(such as pogroms). But, such considerations don’t distinguish between voluntary(or saintly) victims and involuntary victims. (The story of Israel has amply demonstrated how Jews act when they comprise the majority with advantage in arms.) Saints choose victimhood out of the goodness of their heart, even sacrificing their lives for what they believe to be right. Most victims throughout history, however, have been involuntary, i.e. at the mercy of others simply because they were weaker. While involuntary victims are deserving of sympathy, they should not be confused for saints or martyrs. They are like people hit by an earthquake or tsunami, surely in need of help but certainly not self-sacrificing heroes.
There’s another kind of victimhood, what might be called ‘reactive victimhood’, or victimization caused by backlash against harm done to others. Germans and Japanese at the end of World War II were victimized alright but only because they lost the war, which, had they won, would have led to the mass victimization of their enemies.
For every action, there is a reaction, and German and Japanese acts of aggression that victimized others eventually sprang back at them, leading to the mass suffering of millions of Germans and Japanese. Jewish victimhood through the ages was either involuntary or reactive. Not being militarily dominant, Jews, like so many other second-tier groups, were often run roughshod by mightier empires. As such, Jews suffered as involuntary victims.
But, much of Jewish victimhood was also reactive, the backlash against the Jews by goyim enraged with rapacious Jewish practices, subversive Jewish ploys, or radical Jewish agendas. Many Ukrainians joined with Nazi Germans in the rounding up and mass-killing of Jews as vengeance for the Great Famine instigated by the Jewish-heavy Bolshevik regime.
Sadly, even in reactive victimhood, too many innocent people get brutalized or killed. Anti-Jewish pogroms harmed not only Jewish tax-collectors but women and children as well. Allied bombing of Germany and Japan killed lots of old folks and babies. But then, even when Zionists justify the military actions in Gaza in terms of reactive victimization — since Hamas victimized ‘peace-loving’ Jews on 10/7, Israelis are justified in the collective-and-reactive victimization of all Gazans to teach the semi-barbarian Palestinians a lesson they will never forget — , they don’t seem to care one iota about all the dead women, children, and even babies.
There’s hardly any daylight between the Nazi logic of “Because some Jews did us wrong, we have the right to brutalize any number of Jews” and the ZioNazi logic of “Because some Palestinians struck us, we have the right to slaughter any number of Palestinians”; and white goy cucks are totally fine with the ZioNazi logic even as they hysterically wail about the evils done to Jews in the past, overlooking the fact that those ‘evils’ were done by Europeans mostly.
One of the more convenient ways for whites to expunge themselves of the guilt of ‘antisemitism’ is to accuse OTHERS of Jew-hatred as they themselves sidle up to Zion as its most reliable toadies. “Oh Jewish Master, we’re totally with you against Jew-hating Palestinians and Iranians; and the Leftists are the ‘real Anti-Semites’ for questioning Israel.” All such flattery in the nervous hope that Jews won’t dredge up the fact of historical ‘antisemitism’ as mostly a Christian-European phenomenon.
The cult of victimhood has been the most potent smokescreen for Jewish supremacism. Years ago, some joked of Jews invoking the Holocaust to carry out a holocaust of their own, and well, it has come to pass. Even though National Socialist Germans also played on victimology(by way of stab-in-the-back and Versailles Treaty narratives), their pride kept it on the margins of their worldview; perhaps they were honorable(in their perverse way) to indulge in the hypocrisy of playing hapless victim while pushing for imperial victory. In the end, their ambitions for greatness and hegemony were on full display.
In contrast, a complete shamelessness animates the Jewish Supremacist worldview, with ZioNazis acting like Jewish Hitlers in Anne Frank masks. Also, if Germans were manly enough to fight their own battles, Zionists huff-and-puff but then passively-aggressively presses upon white goyim to do the heavy lifting of the Zionic agenda that, as often as not, leads to devastating wars.
Given the dualistic(or two-faced) nature of Jewish Power, white goy cucks, whose fealty to Jews is really based on worship of Jews as the master race, may sustain the charade of siding with the Jews out of compassion, especially in memory of the Holocaust. The servant-dog of Jews pretending to be their white knight and defender against ‘Anti-Semites’ apparently cooking up another Shoah.
As for the religious or spiritual angle when it comes to goy cuckery to the Jews, it has aspects of both supremacism and victimology. On the one hand, Christo-Talmudists read the Holy Book as akin to something like Alfred Rosenberg’s THE MYTH OF THE 20TH CENTURY. They believe Jews have sacred blood that makes them superior to goyim. Good goyim bow down to the Jews(like the ancient Hebrews bowed down to Yahweh), whereas bad goyim who defy the Jews have no reason to live, like the ‘short people’ of Randy Newman’s song, except unlike Newman, they ain’t kidding.
Just as it was rightfully up to God to strike down the bad Jews(like Edward G. Robinson’s character in TEN COMMANDMENTS who summons the mob to worship the Golden Calf), the Christo-Talmudists believe that Jews and their reliable goy cuck dogs have the right to destroy any bunch of goyim, white or non-white, who dare to sneer at the divine mandate of the Jews. Their own version of the Ten Commandments goes something like this: “You must kiss Jewish arse; you must suck Jewish penis; you must lick Jewish toes; you must drink Jewish piss; you must eat Jewish poop, and so on.”
In a nutshell, you must love what Jews love, you must hate what Jews hate, you must defend what Jews want defended, you must destroy what Jews want destroyed. It sure explains the US supplying Israel with weapons to slaughter women & children in Gaza and elsewhere and with full endorsement.
This is clearly a master race ideology but spun as something other on account of the spiritual factor. You see, whereas Nazi supremacism was an obvious case of man-made hubris, Jewish chosen-ness is a humble submission to God’s will. Thus, the conceit of packaging ethnocentric arrogance into a profound humility before God. Don’t blame the Jews because GOD chose them. Never mind Jews wrote their holy text as a kind of self-aggrandizing collective autobiography, but they certainly did a terrific job, with the God Excuse having hoodwinked so many gullible goyim.
Christians through the ages never doubted the Jewish Covenant but believed that it passed from the Jews to all of humanity via the messianic grace of Jesus Christ. Thus, the conflict between Jews and Christians(and Muslims) has been a kind of Tug-of-Covenant, with Jews insisting that it’s only between God and themselves whereas Christians preach it’s for everyone via the sacrifice of Jesus, a figure loathed by most religious Jews. Christianity makes sense ONLY as a radical revision of Judaism, as a reconceptualization of the relation between God and Man. If indeed there is no fundamental difference between Judaism and Christianity, what would have been the point of the New Testament?
Yet, the odd thing about Christian Zionists or Christo-Talmudists is that, even as they profess faith in Jesus Christ as the Messiah and savior, they rank the Old Testament above the New Testament. Thus, they ignore(if not outright deny) the Christian teaching that the original Covenant has been annulled by Jesus and the Apostles, especially Paul, and passed to the Christians. They clearly prefer the Old Testament to the New One, i.e. they have Torah Envy, even though few will admit it openly. They prefer its tribalism, spiritual supremacism, and the God of uncontrollable wrath always prepared to unleash his fury on the sinful to smite them real good. After all, the Old Testament is far closer to conservative sentiments than is the New Testament, which, if followed to the letter, still remains a radical rulebook.
There was a time when Christian Zionists were regarded as closet-‘Anti-Semites’ who supported Israel as a means to fulfill the Christian prophecy of Armageddon and the return of Jesus who, with an army of SS angels, would hunt down all Jews who’d still reject Christ. Thus, Zionists and Christians were uneasy partners in support of a common agenda for different ends. Jews used Christian superstition for their worldly gains, and Christian Zionists used Jewish nationalism for their otherworldly hopes. It should surprise no one that Jews came out on top in this bargain as those who truck in reality usually beat those who bank on fantasies. And we thought American Indians were stupid for selling Manhattan for a bead necklace. Still, at the spiritual level, the Christian Zionists of old held their own against the Jews, believing that Zionism wasn’t an end but merely a means to God’s true design as promised in the Book of Revelation.
But that no longer seems to be the case. Christian Zionism has turned into full-blown Christo-Talmudism wherein goy cuck Christians(usually white) truly believe that Jews are the Chosen Master Race and that the Old Testament is the real thing, thereby rendering the New Testament as secondary, akin to an appendix.
Also, if Christian Zionists of the Old School made efforts to work with religious Jews against sinful and decadent secular Jews — a fool’s errand as even religious Jews prefer secular Jews over Christians — , Christo-Talmudists have abandoned such distinctions and worship all Jews for having ‘superior’ Jewish blood. No problem that Israel has been run by secular supremacists whose concept of Jewishness is ethnocentric than religious. Totally atheist Jews are welcome to immigrate to Israel, whereas goyim who convert to Judaism have a much harder time. It hardly matters to Christo-Talmudic cucks like Mike Huckabee that Netanyahu lacks religiosity and defines Jewishness merely in ethno-supremacist terms. It doesn’t matter that Israel is the ‘gayest place on Earth’ that indulges in all manners of degenerate vices, the kind spelled out in the Sodom and Gomorrah story in the Torah. It doesn’t matter that Israeli Jews terrorize Christian Arabs and spit on Christian clerics. The only thing that matters is Jews got Jewish blood, and that makes them superior to goyim. It is why Talmudism is now essential to understanding the new relation between Jews and Christ-cucks, whose view of Jews no longer makes sense solely on the basis of Biblical Canon.
After all, regardless of whether one prefers the Old Testament or the New Testament, Jews are often judged and cursed in the Bible by none other than God Himself who is infuriated by the failures and betrayals of His Chosen Tribe. At the very least, the Old Testament is about Jews trying, albeit often unsuccessfully, to keep their end of the bargain(aka Covenant) with God. Jews may be chosen, but it entails burdens as well as blessings. It doesn’t mean a free pass(in the eyes of God) regardless of what they do. The Talmud is less about righteous piety toward what has been revealed than about legal manipulation and logical circumvention of God’s laws; a lawyerly game, it favors the rabbis over the prophets, the revisions over the revelations. Talmudic Rabbis have done to the Tanakh what US politicians have done to the Constitution, the practice of which is more about the rule of lawyers than the Rule of Law, routinely distorting rights and limitations out of expediency.
If the Word in the Tanakh is the holy text, the words in the Talmud are merely a pretext, the purpose of which is to put Jews uber alles by hook and by crook vis-a-vis goyim regardless of their moral/spiritual upkeep. Huckabee and ilk are Christo-Talmudists in their unconditional adulation of Jews. If Jews were to put on a massive sodomic orgy in Jerusalem and publicly spit on images of Jesus and burn crucifixes, Christo-Talmudists like Huckabee, Ted Cruz, Mike Pompeo, Tom Cotton, and etc. would remain unflinchingly resolute in their support of Jews as the Chosen-Master Race.
Pat Robertson and Jerry Falwell may have been goofball numb-nuts as Christian Zionists, but at the very least they called out Jewish influence in the West as mostly baneful in its ‘liberal’ and secular ungodliness. But such reservations are hardly aired anymore among the new generation of Christian Zionists or Christo-Talmudists who behold the Jews as totally badass on account of the latter’s boundless wealth and ruthless(godlike) will as the masters of the universe. They are like a bunch of Jeff Spicolis(in FAST TIMES AT RIDGEMONT HIGH) yapping ‘awesome’ at the sheer demonstration of Jewish might, which in their Mammonite-American mind is evidence of God’s design.
To grasp the mentality of Christo-Talmudism, consider the jewelry-studded figure of Erika Kirk in ‘mourning’. The ‘American Jesus’ runs on the Prosperity Gospel, by the logic of which the Jews are the most favored by God since they got the most bling. But then, as it’s rather gauche to say as much, Christo-Talmudists resort to singing paeans to the supposed spiritual aura emanating from Jews based on Biblical lore. Christo-Talmudism shares with atheist Ayn-Randism a penchant for mythmaking as ‘moral’ or ‘intellectual’ cover. Embarrassing for a libertarian to admit he sucks up to certain people for their wealth and privilege? Then, go with the Randian fantasy that the rich embody the heroic and near-divine spirit of individualism, liberty, and vision. Shameful for a Christo-Talmudist to admit that he sucks up to Jews for their power and influence, the wherewithal to make or break anyone? Then, express heartfelt sympathy with the Holy Holocaust folks or profound gratitude to the People of the Book without whom goyim wouldn’t know God. Expound ‘high-minded’ fantasies to warm up the cold hard fact that you’re a brownnosing cuck-maggot to power and wealth.
While Christianity has forever been interlinked(often nefariously) with power and privilege, the American manifestation of this Quasi-Faustian pact birthed the shameless bastard of the Prosperity Gospel. When white Christians were on top in the US, at the very least the cult of wealth upheld the preeminence of Christianity as the formula of worldly success(as a sign of God’s blessing). But, American Christianity was faced with a theological dilemma when Jews surpassed in wealth, influence, and power the white Christians, including the so-called WASPs, the lords of the socialite circle. If America is “God’s Country” and if worldly success is evidence of God’s blessing, how could it be that the Jews, a people who rejected(and even killed) Christ, gained the key to the kingdom?
Of course, a true Christian would simply have stated that wealth and power are poor barometers of God’s will, especially in the case of Christianity as Jesus preached against riches in favor of pious poverty. But given the cultural DNA of Americanism that played out in the most abundant piece of real estate in the world, even spirituality couldn’t resist the Mammonite and Caesarian temptations.
As Patton said, “Americans love a winner. Americans will not tolerate a loser”, and so the actual preaching of Jesus went ignored in search of theological contortions to conflate materiality with spirituality.
In winner-is-all America, the worldly came to trump and shape the otherworldly, and as Jews gained the most worldly power, they also came to be regarded as the most otherworldly blessed. It developed as something uniquely American, though it is now proselytized around the world via the Jewish-dominated media and institutions for which Christ-cucks are recruited to do the bidding of Zion.
For all the Old World’s co-mingling of politics, wealth, and the church for as long as anyone can remember, it would have been deemed vulgar and uncouth, even scandalous, to blurt out that God is all about the bling. If the bright side of Americanism is a more candid expression of desire for freedom and liberty, the dark side is the shameless obsession with power and wealth for their own sake, made worse by the ebbing away of the Protestant Work Ethic that once served as a brake on unabashed materialism, the kind today embodied by trashy Donald Trump and the ‘Epsteinesque’ Jewish oligarchs around him.
As for the Baptists and similar idiots pontificating about ‘Muh Israel’ and the Jews as the Chosen of God, of course it’s really about their awe of Jewish money and power, thinly disguised with theological BS derived from the Scofield Bible. If Jews were low-IQ, poor, and with zero influence, would any Christian bother to dredge up some charlatan’s interpretation of the Bible to place Jews atop the pedestal? The simple answer is NO. It’s been said Jews earn like Episcopalians but vote like Puerto Ricans. They also talk like Anne Frank and walk like Adolf Hitler. ‘Semiticism’ is the new ‘Aryanism’, and indeed, Jewish ‘Anti-Aryanism’ is the flipside of ‘Anti-Semitism’, two equally charged magnets repulsing one another. At some point in history, the ‘Aryans’(meaning Europeans, especially of Anglo, Nordic, or Germanic origin) and the ‘Semites’(meaning Judeo-European Jews, especially the Ashkenazis) came to identify the Other as the gravest threat to one’s own dominance, even survival itself.
Therefore, extreme ‘Anti-Semitism’ sought to root out Jewish influence(and even Jews themselves) from key spheres of influence, and in turn, ‘Anti-Aryanism’ worked in overdrive to disparage and discredit any notion of white identity, interests, and independence, implying that whites must subordinate their purpose and abilities in service to the prerogatives of the Other, the lion’s share of which is reserved for Jews — indeed, the last thing the Jewish Supremacists want would be for whites to sacrifice themselves in service to the Palestinians or Iranians at the expense of Zionist objectives.
Just like anti-Jewish elements in the West used ‘Semite’ as a dirty word for Jews, Jews made ‘Aryan’ synonymous with racial supremacism and industrial slaughter of innocents. Ironically, the supposedly reformed and redemptive ‘Aryans’ are now fully committed to the Zionist industrial-scale slaughter of innocents across the Middle East.
National Socialist Germany and Jewish-run US make for an interesting study in contrast. Both under control of ruthless supremacists who don’t care how many are killed or starved in the fulfilment of their objectives. But whereas the Germans failed by making too-many-enemies, the Zio-US might fail by making too-many-‘friends’. Hitler had a real chance at dominating continental Europe as long as he remained ‘friends’ with the Soviet Union. When he gambled for Russian conquest, he was surrounded by enemies all around. The few friends, Italy and Japan, were either weak, far away, or occupied with their own ‘existential’ crises. The lesson of the German fiasco is it’s better to make friends than enemies.
However, power operates by concentrating one set of forces and directing them against others, necessitating a clear delineation between ‘us’ and ‘them’. It’s like Coke vs Pepsi. Coke may work with various brands but not with Pepsi. A power with too many friends finds it difficult to maneuver against the odd enemy. For example, the Jewish-run US made a ‘friend’ of China, but the latter’s backing of Iran complicates Zionist plans to destroy it. (But then, if the Jewish-run US makes an enemy of China, it increasingly becomes like Nazi Germany that made more enemies than friends.)
Now, having lots of friends may be a fine formula for peace, one with the US as benevolent hegemon and negotiator among all nations deemed as friends, and such a future seemed possible(with the consent of the entire world) in the aftermath of the Cold War: The US as the Lone Superpower but also fair broker among all of humanity.
Alas, Jewish Power attained absolute dominance and killed post-Cold War hopes in the cradle. The ‘End of History’ was meant to signal the end of ideological squabbles and the world coalescing under a set of universal principles based on individual liberty and free trade, and the US was the obvious leader in this grand project. Yet, just when the US was going global, it also went ultra-tribal, with Jewish supremacist elites steering US foreign policy into a zero-sum game of Jewish Supremacy.
Thus, the contradiction between universal peace with all nations and tribal prioritization of Zion was bound to result in a schizoid American foreign policy. In a nutshell, the US bowed down to the new master, the Jews, but also made a lot of ‘friends’ who complicated Jewish interests. Ironically, many of those ‘friends’ were made at the behest of Jewish interests, with Jewish Power using both whites-against-nonwhites and nonwhites-against-whites( as well as nonwhites-against-nonwhites). Notice Jews summon their white ‘friends’ to smash the Arab and/or Muslim World but then summon their nonwhite ‘friends’ to overwhelm white populations in the West. The Gaza crisis exposed the Jewish problem of having too-many-friends: Jews, who’d called on nonwhites to revile ‘white supremacists’ in 2020, found themselves in league with the latter against nonwhite supporters of Palestinians.
The US claims to be a global leader, a fair and trustworthy guarantor of the Rules-Based Order, but is ready to backstab any nation and betray any trust, all in service to Zion. So, Trump plays at ‘statesmanship’ with other leaders but, at the end of the day, is back to being the henchman for the Israel Lobby. Adding to the confusion is Jews being perceived as both the most liberal/global group and the most tribal/ethnocentric group as well.
As schizoid as the Zio-US-run world order is, it has plenty of takers around the world for reasons ranging from cowardice to cynicism to greed to awe to reverence. Javier Milei, for example, is totally in awe of rich and powerful Jews, much like white cucks in Congress bowing down before Zion. But even plenty of warier nations go along with the charade out of fear and/or greed. Arab rulers may dislike Zionism personally, but they know the Jewish-run US is the top dog on their block, and there are lots of treats to be had for those who play along. And so they comply with hierarcho-universalism. Still, the biggest adherents are the white goy cuck-maggots: Christo-Talmudists and HDB(nominally ‘human-bio-diversity’ but practically ‘Hebrew-Bio-Domination’) ideologues(or more like idolaters of Jewish Genius with no regard to morals or ethics).
Then, it makes sense that Christianity went from a movement AWAY from Jews to a movement TOWARD Jews. In its incarnation as a budding faith, virtually all Early Christians were Jews who not only failed to win over most Jews but were persecuted by them. Therefore, the only chance for their faith was via proselytization to goyim.
Once goyim took over the reins of Christianity, the faith was no longer about moving AWAY from Jews as goyim never belonged to the Judaic Tribe to begin with. For most of Christian history, the faith stood independent of Judaism, acknowledging the latter as spiritual predecessor but also demoting it as an ashen dogma with spent prophecies, the living fire of which had supposedly passed over to Christianity as the light unto mankind. From the Church’s perspective, Judaism was a relic of the past, a spiritual mausoleum doggedly guarded by Jews who refused the saving hand of Christ. And as the Christian World went from strength to strength, European Christians grew in confidence that God was on their side, even though such power-logic belied the actual teachings of Jesus.
Later, with the Emancipation of Jewry in 19th Century Europe(as much from their religious-tribal authority as from discriminatory laws imposed by Christendom), there was a sudden explosion of Jewish achievements in various areas, which, coupled with Jewish financial networks and knowhow, presaged the dawn of Jewish ascendancy, even takeover. But these successes were secular, often involving assimilationist Jews(some of whom even converted to Christianity and downplayed their ethnic origins) and radical leftist Jews who tried their luck at power through Marxism and related ideologies.
It would have been something of a stretch for the conservative white Christian community to draw a link between Jewish successes in wealth-power-influence and Biblical prophecy, especially as most of these ultra-successful Jews weren’t religious(or hostile to religion in general).
What did the trick(in persuading Christian Conservatives) was Zionism, which, though conceived as a secular ethnic project, a kind of proto-national-socialism for Jews in search of a homeland, somehow overlapped with the obsessions of the Bible-babblers. Most probably, had Jews founded their homeland in any place other than the Holy Land, white conservative Christians probably would have been far less enthused about the ‘Judeo-Christian’ partnership. As it happened, Zionism settled on the land rich in spiritual symbolism, and even if most early Zionists weren’t theologically inclined, it provided sufficient impetus for right-wing Christian Fundamentalists to spin the Zionist project as Biblical Prophecy in motion, with Jews finally returning to the Holy Land to bring about the return of Jesus who shall rapture the righteous and spare the Jews who accept Him at last while tossing the rest into the bowels of Hell.
Even though Jews of all stripes, religious and secular and everything in between, loathed the right-wing Christian fundie-dundies, they knew that the latter’s support could be crucial in times to come, especially when the secular community may grow in doubt or criticism of the Zionist Project. (After all, religious types tend to be pigheaded in their unconditional devotion to whatever has a hold on them.) Thus, the Christian community became wedded to a form of Jewish-Nationalist-Imperialism in a manner inconceivable throughout the tortured history of Jewish-Christian relations.
In time, as the likes of Jerry Falwell and Pat Robertson passed from the scene, their successors grew up in a world where Jews(of all stripes) had become an object of profuse sympathy(especially on account of Holocaustianity) and profound admiration(for their genius and wealth). If Jews had once felt compelled to express(or at least feign) respect for Christianity and prove themselves as a credit-to-their-own-tribe in the eyes of white Christian goyim, the roles were reversed in the decades following World War II.
Increasingly, Jews felt emboldened to criticize and judge Christianity as a corrupted hypocrisy OR mock and ridicule it as being repressive of the natural and healthy, and with hardly any backlash. Meanwhile, ‘antisemitism’ became an ever more sensitive topic and then a career-destroying and reputation-ruining one. Thus, the US and the West in general went from a world where Jews had to prove themselves worthy of Christians to one where whites/Christians had to prove themselves worthy of the Jews. What might be called ‘Antisemitophobia’, the extreme dread of being labeled a Jew-hater or being disapproved of by venerable Jews, became the rule of the day.
By the time Christian Fundamentalism was in the hands of the likes of Ralph Reed, it was essentially a grift enterprise based on sucking up to Jews and their approved ideology of libertarianism that encouraged whites to forgo racial identity and cultural heritage in favor of ‘muh money’. It’s no wonder Reed got swept up in the Jewish-led and libertarian-backed Indian Casino scam.
And with the taboos against bashing Christianity a thing of the past, the dam burst with recriminations against the moral failings and betrayals of the Church, past and present. The Catholic Church was accused of everything from being a haven for pedophiles to an institution once led by “Hitler’s Pope”. Southern White Christians were associated with the KKK and history of ‘racism’.
Not that there weren’t legitimate grounds for such accusations. The problem was that the group most in control of these anti-Christian inquisitions had rigged the game so that similar charges couldn’t be made against Jews and their own long history of hiding skeletons in the closet.
As a result, if white Christians refused to own up to their sinful past, they were condemned as unrepentant ‘racists’ and ‘bigots’, and etc. But if similar demands were made on Jews to answer for their own failings, it was denounced as ‘Anti-Semitic’.
Naturally, in a system thus rigged the socio-cultural conditioning came to favor the Jews over Whites/Christians. So, if the generation of Jerry Falwell might still propose the notion of the Anti-Christ as a Jewish fella(like Ron Jeremy perhaps), the generation of Ralph Reed and those that came after would be afraid to entertain such a thought even as a joke. When Billy Graham privately conversed with Richard Nixon, they candidly discussed the Jewish Question. Already by then, it was scandalous to openly unload on the Jews, but whites could still be blunt about Jewish influence in private.
Today, it’s doubtful that a castrated cuck like the Speaker of the House Mike Johnson would dare entertain a negative thought about Jews even if alone in a bunker reinforced with ten-foot concrete walls. It’s as if the omnipotent Big Brother Jew is watching them from within. Jews are so awesome, Jews are so rich, Jews are so tragic, Jews are so chosen, Jews are so smart, Jews are so strong-willed, Jews are so badass. It’s as if every white cuck is a Zio-‘Manchurian Candidate’: “Jews are the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human beings I’ve ever known in my life.”
The end-result has been a dramatic makeover of Christianity into a spiritual bridge facilitating pilgrimage toward Jewishdom as the New Rome toward which all roads lead. Thus, Zion is now to white Christians what Mecca is to Muslims all over the world. If Muslims believe it’s their duty to make a Hajj to Mecca, white Christian Zionists(or Christo-Talmudists) feel they must make an ass of themselves at the feet of Jews, the Wailing Wall, or the annual AIPAC convention. As Thomas Massie revealed, just about every Congressman has an AIPAC-handler.
It’s as if white goyim are retarded special-needs children who can’t make up their own minds and must be guided at every turn, especially pertaining to Jewish/Zionist matters. When it comes to Jews, Israel, and ‘antisemitism’, US politicians sound more like the brainwashed minions of North Korea chanting mantras to the glory of the Kim Dynasty. Bibi Netanyahu, in the eyes of the GOP, is like the star-combo of Elvis Presley, Michael Jackson, the Beatles, Jesus, George Washington, Abraham Lincoln, and MLK, second only to the Jewish God Himself. While no Jew goes to the Vatican and prays before Christian icons(or to Mecca to honor Muhammad), white Christ-cucks stand in line to humiliate themselves before the Wailing Wall in the presence of Jews who hold them in contempt and only use them for political expediency.
Whether John McCain’s deference to Joe Lieberman, Sean Hannity’s self-abasement before Mark Levin, Jon Voight & Javier Milei breaking into tears at the mere mention of Israel or Jewishness, the white/Christian mind is now hapless putty in the hands of Jews. (It’s kind of like a cuck-aliyah, i.e. all these once godless, liberal, or libertarian-leaning whites ‘returning to God’ by way of Jew-worship or fetishization. You see it in Steve Sailer from the right and Christopher Hitchens from the left, partly on account of having some Jewish blood. Sailer’s evolutionism turned into a fetishization of the Jews as the most evolved specimen on account of Nobel stats. Hitchens went for a more oblique rationalization on account of modern Jews supposedly being the most liberated from Jewish tradition, i.e. Jews are the best because they’re the most un-Jewish. Whatever. Yeah, all those Neocons with whom he teamed up during the Iraq War were most ‘un-Jewish’, LOL.)
To white Christo-Talmudists, Jesus and the New Testament are now secondary, merely a spiritual halfway-house to the Real Thing, the true object of worship: Jews as the Chosen-Master-Race ‘blessed’ with genius, wealth, power, and bling. If Christo-Talmudists were told that Jesus would weep at the suffering in Gaza, they would remain unmoved as, in their holes for souls, Jews come before Jesus; they would simply retort that Jews are the apple of God’s eye, even to the point of implying that divine faith in Jews matters more than the Jewish faith in God. After all, Christo-Talmudists have an unconditional allegiance to the Jews; they dare not judge the Jews but are quick to judge(and condemn) anyone who dares to do so.
Jews, being so great, may do anything to the Palestinians, just like God has a free hand over sinful mankind(with the exception of Jews, of course). In the Book of Job, the good man is supposed to take all the slings and arrows of God without complaint. Likewise, the only way Palestinians can be good before the godlike Jews is to just take it, accept Jewish domination as rightful, and never ever complain. Then and only then, they may be worthy of a piece of moldy bread.
In the Christo-Talmudic imagination, daring to resist the godlike Jews is akin to humans defying God, tantamount to modern-day blasphemy, and anyone doing so must be smitten to dust and ash(or taken out like Charlie Kirk who was awakening to Zionist evil). How dare then that Iran remain defiant of Zionist hegemony? Israel has lots of nukes aimed at Iran while Iran has none. But Israel can do whatever it wants because Jews are awesome and godlike. Iranians, in contrast, are mere goyim and therefore should follow the lead of craven Arab dogs and White Christian cucks who suck up to Jews at every turn.
Jews push the Great Replacement or White Nakba on the West and promote all manner of anti-white propaganda but mustn’t be judged because they’re simply the favored of God. In contrast, the duty of goyim is to just ‘take it’, like the figure of Job before God. Most whites in the West just take it and suffer in silence under Jewish Supremacy. But then, these idiot white goyim feel righteous in their unconditional obedience to the almighty Jews, and if anything, they are appalled that there are still some goyim in the world, such as Palestinians, Iranians, and other ‘Anti-Semites’ who refuse to similarly bow down and just ‘take it’ in effusive fealty to Jewish Power.
For the Christ-Cuck maggots, Christianity has been radically remolded into a meal-ticket for sucking up to rich and powerful Jews who hold all the cards. The history of religion(and philosophy) has always been about selectivity, i.e. depending on which ‘truths’ are quoted, one can make anything out to be anything. The Biblical God can be portrayed as just, compassionate, and peace-loving. Or He can be made out to be intemperate, ruthless, and even sadistic. There are passages in the Tanakh where the Jewish God seems very much like the gods of other peoples, willing to smite entire populations on a whim. Sometimes, the Jewish God seems all-too-human(and not in the best ways), and other times, He seems abstract and mysterious, beyond man’s capacity to comprehend.
According to certain passages, God wants the Jews to live in just peace with the goyim; according to others, God favors the Jews for sake of tribal aggrandizement. Even though the New Testament served as filter to refine Godliness into one of universal love/compassion, forgiveness, and eternal justice, the more warlike Christians have often quoted the passage where Jesus enters the Temple with a whip. So, even though essential message of Jesus is ‘forgive your enemy’ and ‘turn the other cheek’, many Christians justify their hawkish views on what Jesus did to the money-changers. Selective religiosity is nothing new.
Even so, it’s breathtakingly disingenuous for today’s Christo-Talmudists to virtually bypass the entirety of the New Testament and select a handful of choice quotes from the Old Testament, namely those about Jews being the Chosen and how goyim who bless the Jews will be blessed and goyim who curse the Jews will be cursed. (By the way, as God sometimes cursed the Jews for bad behavior, is He cursed too?) Never mind that the whole purpose of the New Testament was to cancel the original Covenant, and the very meaning of being Christian derives from the concept of the New Israel, which would be all Christian converts regardless of their race or ethnicity, and of the New Covenant that is based on spirituality, not on blood.
Amusingly, even as these Christ-cuck-maggots worship Talmudic Jews, they willfully ignore the vicious and bilious rot in the Talmud pertaining to subhuman goyim. If Christo-Talmudists of the Scofield persuasion insist, “those who bless Jews will be blessed, those who curse Jews will be cursed”, a whole lot of Jews, Talmudic or secular, seem to behave on the precept of “Jews who bless goyim(especially Christians) will be cursed, Jews who curse goyim(especially Christians) will be blessed.”
If the traditional Judeo-Christian relations were mutually suspicious and antagonistic — ‘Dirty Christ-Killing Jews’ vs ‘Filthy Sub-Human Goyim who idol-worship the false prophet Jesus’ — , the new relation is one of man and dog. Christians, especially white Christo-Talmudists, urge upon one another to bow down to the Jews as the Chosen and Blessed by God, the Holy Master Race. Just as a dog is expected to remain loyal to his master even when beaten and mistreated, white Christ-tards tirelessly admonish one another to never ever get angry with the Jews/Zionists no matter what because the lowly goyim are unfit to lick the boots and untie the shoelaces of the holy blessed Jews, luminaries like Alex Karp and Laura Loomer.
The cuck-command is a despicable perversion of Christian ideal of saintliness. While it’s true that a saint may not lift his fist and instead suffer at the hands of his tormentor, even summoning spiritual strength from within to forgive, the saint nevertheless knows that the abuser is doing evil and to be ultimately judged by God. Take the saintly Negro of UNCLE TOM’S CABIN who doesn’t put up a fight as he’s beaten to death. In his ‘sacrifice’, he isn’t submitting to the authority of his abuser but that of a higher being. Deep in his heart, he knows the bully is committing evil and will be judged by the Lord above. He’s not some servile toady submitting like a dumb animal but one who resists with his heart even as he rests his fists. In other words, the Christian saint ‘turns the other cheek’ not in surrender and compliance but on a higher plane of defiance and judgement.
In contrast, the utter self-abasement on the part of Christo-Talmudists is purely doglike and servile, a total abnegation of moral sense and spiritual principles. It’s based on the assumption that Jews must be the Chosen because they are the richest and most powerful people on Earth. Its bogus ‘spirituality’ is really based on Jewish material success. As Jews are thus idolized as the ‘chosen’, they’re deemed to know best, with license to do as they please, whereas goyim exist only to ‘bless’ Jews because otherwise they shall be ‘cursed’.
Such a decrepit theocratic mentality now shapes US foreign policy, e.g. Iran must be cursed and blown into the Stone Age because it ‘curses’ modern-day supremacist and genocidal Israel. So, the American military is merely an extension of God’s mandate(that favors the Jews as ubermensch), and its purpose is to ‘bless’ countries that suck up to Israel and ‘curse’ countries that defy Israel.
Of course, even a cursory examination of the West shows that the well-being of its core white population has been going downhill ever since whites/Christians have been sucking up to Jews, but there’s nothing dumber than blind faith, especially when blinded with the shimmering gems of Jewish wealth and power.
It’s been said that the Jewish tradition is the source of Western Civilization’s moral compass. Greeks taught the West how to think and philosophize, Jews taught the West how to judge and pray. And this owed to a profoundly moral conceptualization of God in the Bible, the Supreme Being who ended human sacrifice and presented mankind with a set of sacred laws to live by.
But, such an appreciation works ONLY IF Jews are included on the side of humanity(with all its sins and failings) than on the side of God(as the embodiment of perfection and holiness). If anything, the Covenant for the Jews is supposed to be as much a burden as a privilege. Righteous elites use their power for the good of everyone, whereas piggish elites flaunt their privilege as a birthright at the expense of everyone else; if the Epstein Files have revealed one thing, too many powerful Jews are piggish than righteous.
If God is righteous and if God chose the Jews, then the Jews, in emulation of God, must strive to be better than others and guide humanity toward salvation; and one may argue that this was the mission of Jesus and the Disciples, even though one may fault Christianity as pathologically flawed in the conviction that Jesus, far from merely being the Messiah, is the Son of God and therefore God Himself.
In a way, the mindless and unconditional worship of Jewry by Christo-Talmudists is a sick variation of the cult of Jesus. Surely, all Christians heard the story of two men, one who is decent and kind in all his deeds but not a believer in Jesus and the other who is foul and gross, even murderous, in all his deeds but comes to Jesus in the final moment of his life. The story says the good man, despite having practiced Christian virtues, shall be cast down to Hell for not accepting Jesus as the Son of God, whereas the bad man, despite having led a devilish life, shall enter Heaven because he accepted Jesus in his final breath.
The story implies that the Cult of Christ trumps the teachings of Jesus, i.e. you can follow the teachings of Jesus to the letter, but if you don’t accept Him as the Son of God, you burn in Hell, whereas if you disobey all the teachings of Jesus but accept Jesus as divine, you enter Heaven. So, the cult of personality matters more than the adherence to virtues.
Likewise, a megalomaniacal cult of personality in communist states came to elevate the Great Leader over any consistent set of principles, brilliantly satirized by George Orwell in NINETY EIGHTY-FOUR. Reflecting on most great figures in history, we make a distinction between the man and his achievements/contributions/teachings. Plato may have been a great philosopher, but it doesn’t mean he was necessarily a good man, and it certainly doesn’t mean we should worship the man himself. In the end, the teachings matter more than the teacher.
Not so with Christianity where the worship of Jesus is paramount, indeed to the point where many Christians assume they could act un-Christian as long as they worship the figure of Jesus as the Son of God. Paradoxically, belief in Jesus’ divinity becomes a convenient excuse to ignore His teachings.
This pathological aspect of Christianity has transformed into a cultish worship of the Jews as the Holy Chosen people. In other words, what matters most is that we ‘bless’ the Jews to the point of mindless worship because that, more than anything, is the ticket to earning the approval of God. Under Christianity, you don’t have to act Christian as long as you believe in Jesus, whereupon the angels will open the gates of Heaven to you. For Christ-Cucks, morality and ethics are secondary to an unconditional near-worship of Jews as the surest guarantee of God letting you and your kind into Heaven.
So, it doesn’t matter what Jews do or what Christo-Talmudists do. They could act most foul, gross, disgusting, and vile, but as long as Jews are Jews, they are the chosen of God; and as long as Christo-Talmudists ‘bless’ the Jews, they are also to be blessed by God for their unconditional devotion to Jews.
Given such amorality, Jews and Christ-Talmudists might as well believe in the Aztec religion. Consider the fact that American Christians are, by and large, utterly unfazed by the horrors committed by Jews in Gaza. The only thing that matters is that Jews are special and ‘chosen’, demonstrated by their wealth and power in the US(as “God’s Country”), and therefore what matters most is to be in good graces with such a ‘blessed’ people, at least within the context of Americanism where ‘winners’ are everything and ‘losers’ are nothing. The current Judeomania in the West, especially among white American Christo-Talmudists, is a kind of Birthright Supremacy that has more in common with Nazi ‘Aryan’-ism.
The historical-cultural phenomenon of Jewishness is surely unique, and even though its characteristics didn’t predetermine what came to be, which is global Jewish supremacism, the outcome cannot be understood apart from the peculiarities of the Tribe.
One factor is the collective sense of history as shared ancestry, a binding sense that all Jews are part of the same larger family. Comparing Jews and Han Chinese is instructive. Even though the Chinese have a generic sense of shared ethnicity, culture, and history, the cultural emphasis has been on personal ancestry, what some China Scholars called ‘familism’, i.e. the centerpiece of the Chinese mindset is to revere one’s own familial ancestors and make offerings to them. Thus, the Chinese placed familial considerations above ethnic/national ones. If Chinese family members had to choose between ‘what is good for my family’ and ‘what is good for my people’, they chose the former at the expense, even betrayal, of the latter.
One of the hallmarks of Confucianism is filial piety, and the family served as the metaphor for society as a whole. Thus, the rulers were supposed to be like a father figure to the people. But, metaphors aren’t as powerful as literal meanings, and the core of familism was to take care of one’s family and revere one’s own blood ancestors. Indeed, familism became a metaphor as governing principle precisely because the interests of the family were central to the Chinese, i.e. because the family is most important, even larger society should resemble the management of a family.
As a result, the Chinese sense of attachment was far narrower than that of the Jews, a people who emphasized a sense of collective ancestry than personal ancestry. The Torah lays out the ancestral history of the Jews, and it is to be shared equally among all Jews, rich and poor, powerful and powerless. More importantly, this collective sense of identity trumps the interests of individual Jewish families. Undoubtedly, plenty of Jews throughout history put their family first, even at the expense of Jews in general, but there nevertheless was a nagging sense that Jews must somehow pull their resources together and build networks for the empowerment of the Jewish Tribe as a whole.
The marriages of Jews and Chinese delineate these patterns. The Chinese(often wives) emphasize what is good for the advancement of ‘my family’(and don’t much care about Chinese identity or culture), whereas the Jews(often husbands) tend to emphasize Jewish identity and heritage as a continual thread. No wonder then that 12 million Jews worldwide not only hold their own against 1.4 billion Chinese but intellectually and culturally dominate them.
Indeed, when Chinese emigrate to the West, they usually fall under the influence of Jewish-run media and academia because the Chinese hardly have any consideration other than ‘what is good for my family’; if educational attainment and career success depend on conforming to the current reigning ideology, attitudes, and fashions in the Jewish-run West, Chinese parents will urge their kids to just go along to get along. And of course, China itself came under the ideological prophecy of Karl Marx the Jew, in whose name Mao waged a radical war on Chinese culture and heritage.
There’s also the case of identities that become inseparable with power and glory. Even though something like genuine Roman ethnicity can be traced to earlier times, Roman identity eventually became synonymous with Roman might and empire building. Over time, power = identity in the Roman-dominated world, and the identity turned into one of connective citizenship than collective ancestry. As long as the Romans rode high, the identity(as a kind of political privilege or imperial membership) held prestige and benefits, but once the decline became irreversible, it lost all meaning, and the idea of Roman-ness faded not only from its imperial holdings but from its geographical place of origin, the Italian peninsula.
Portentously, American Identity seems headed in the same direction. It’s all about the prestige of power and wealth, which may explain why the American Empire flails away in all directions with threats and aggressions to show who’s the boss in town, the lone superpower.
It’s as if, were the US to lose its standing as the predominant hegemon in the world, ‘American’-ness will lose not only its value but its very meaning. True identities, regardless of power and wealth, retain a priceless meaning. ‘Roman’ or ‘American’, in contrast, can only be appreciated in relation to power and dominance, even arrogance and megalomania.
After all, consider the ways US politicians and military men have defined America. As the ‘exceptional nation’, the ‘indispensable nation’. It’s less an identity than a boast or pride, like a man who defines himself solely in terms of wealth, privilege, and prizes. Such a critter would be Donald Trump whose ‘America First’ really means he gets be to the First American sitting on the throne surrounded by Jewish handlers who flatter him as Caesar Donaldus.
No doubt World Jewry today is full of hubris, chutzpah, and megalomania. In a way, the Jews have become like the New Romans, even though Jewish Identity remains restricted to Jews and hasn’t been politi-citizenized like Roman-ness. In this, Jewish Power resembles the British Empire of old, one that gained supremacy over much of the world but preserved Anglo racial solidarity.
That said, the various ethnic stocks within Britain(and Ireland) never coalesced into a singular tribal mentality like that of the Jews and, furthermore, the primacy of class eventually undermined racial unity, with the British elites forming closer bonds with the elites of other peoples, Jews and even nonwhites, than with their own racial folk in the lower stratums of society.
In contrast, Jewishness usually prioritized tribe over class, and besides, given the relative lack of ‘dummies’ among European Jews, tribal identity and unity were more feasible among them. As most Jews ranged from above average IQ to high IQ, the upper-Jews needn’t worry too much about the needs of ‘dumb’ or ‘retarded’ Jews, whereas smart and/or upper-crust whites came to regard ‘white trash’ dummies as a burden and drag. These days, most elite whites don’t even regard lower-class whites as human beings.
A people with a wider range of abilities have a harder time keeping it together than a people with a narrower range. Surely, a group composed mostly of elite college students will work together better than a group made up of elite college students, community college students, high school dropouts, and downright illiterates.
Still, given that most Jews are hardly geniuses, the favoritism of uber-smart super-successful Jews toward the lesser Jews(who are above-average in IQ but hardly extraordinary) has led to some problems. Consider the likes of Bari Weiss and Laura Loomer, certainly not ‘retardos’ but not the brightest bulbs in town either and often prone to saying and doing remarkably stupid things. People like Weiss would never have amounted to anything but for the political-and-business machinations of Larry Ellison and his ilk. Smart Jews giving not-so-smart Jews so much responsibility may not pan out in the interests of Zion.
But then, Jews can always rely on goyim being even stupider and dumber. Just think. There are so many instances of Jews fooling, manipulating, and running circles around goyim, white or otherwise, but can anyone name a single instance of goyim doing likewise to the Jews? As Michael Wolff in the Epstein Files remarked in an email, “Jews vs goyim. Jews are winning.”
Goyim are so dumb that they regard as friends and allies the very Jews who work overtime to shove a hot poker up their arse. Take the white goyim who suck up to Jews despite Jewish Power pushing White Nakba, aka the Great Replacement. Take the Christian goyim who get all weepy and sappy about the Holy Jews when the Jewish religion has nothing but contempt for Jesus and Christianity. Take all the idiot white Americans who continue to support the Wars for Israel despite Zion using Diversity to destroy White America.
Jews know it’s about Jews VERSUS Goyim. In contrast, the majority of white goyim wishfully think it’s about Jews AND Whites VERSUS the ‘wogs’. Watching Jews and white goyim is like watching the Marx Brothers run circles around stiff white characters. One never sees whites doing anything even remotely comparable to the Jews. It’s like Jews vs Dumb Polacks.
Even though excessive chutzpah may be the undoing of Jewish supremacist power, Jewish identity is likely to survive the decline/downfall due to its long pedigree as an identity forged in adversity. The idea that their God is the only true God and the ultimate arbiter of right and wrong provided Jews with meaning even when faced with defeat and humiliation, a useful quality to have since most of history is about defeat than victory. In sports, one team wins the championship while the rest loses. And even the winning team this year may well lose next year. Therefore, a team defined only on winning won’t be able to process the trauma of defeat. History is strewn with skeletons of empires that banked on total mastery and domination but utterly vanished once their glory faded. Such politico-cultural entities had no means to digest defeat. All the various subject-peoples who were awed by Roman power and adopted Roman prestige(via citizenship or military service) as their core identity or allegiance found themselves dazed and confused once the empire collapsed like a house of cards. It’s like a man whose sense of self-worth has no meaning apart from wealth and privilege.
Judaism(and its outgrowths Christianity and Islam) provided a moral and spiritual insurance against the shifting fortunes of the world. Even in bondage, individuals of faith are likely to do better than those without faith. Even in the most miserable conditions, a man of faith feels God is watching over him. The Judeo-Christian-Islamic conception of God isn’t only about triumph but righteousness, meaning God favors the weak and righteous over the powerful and wicked.
Indeed, the longevity of Christian and Islam civilizations are remarkable given the rises and falls(and total disappearances) of countless pagan civilizations through the eons. Retaining meaning even in defeat and adversity is something that Europeans and Arabs derived from the Jewish tradition.
Still, whereas Christians and Muslims preserve meaning as individuals of shared creed, Jews do so as a collective group, a blood tribe. A Christian wrongfully mistreated and imprisoned may believe that God is watching over him as a personal matter unrelated to others like himself.
In contrast, Jews believe that God watches over all Jews and will one day put things to right, often by wrathful and vengeful means as repeatedly revealed in the Torah where God smites the goyim in favor of His Chosen People. Also, if there’s an element of forgiveness in Christian faith, none such exists in regards to goyim in Judaism. Those who piss off the Jews shall be utterly destroyed without an ounce of pity. No wonder Jewish holidays are usually associated with mass killings of goyim. As such, Jews not only mastered the art of survival against the worst calamities but honed the strategy of total revenge against their enemies.
Germans may delude themselves that their displays of self-flagellation will one day move Jewish hearts toward forgiveness, but the fact is they’ve been targeted for total destruction, and the future isn’t much brighter for the rest of white goyim if Jewish Power can help it.
It’s nearly impossible to arrive at a middle-ground between Jews and goyim when the Jewish Supremacist mentality is virulently ethnocentric, simply incapable of seeing the world and humanity in terms of what is fair and just for all. Jewish supremacists may play at being ‘liberal’, ‘leftist’, ‘conservative’, ‘globalist’, ‘nationalist’(like Yoram Hazony), and etc., but their overriding agenda is where everything must be adapted to serve Judeocentrism first and foremost.
For example, true liberalism means free speech for all, even those you seriously disagree with. But Jewish ‘liberalism’ is about Jews invoking ‘hate speech’ to decide what must be suppressed. Of course, the ethno-supremacist and genocidal ideology of Zionism is never deemed as ‘hate’. While passages from the New Testament are deemed ‘Anti-Semitic’, there’s no discussion of the tribal-supremacist invectives in the Talmud.
And when Jews claim to be ‘conservative’, it’s not about contributing to the larger mission of preserving traditional values for the benefit of all groups. Instead, it’s about how to manipulate various goy conservatives into supporting Israel uber Alles. There’s no sense of give-and-take, just take-and-take.
But then, the very idea of a middle ground between Jews and goyim as groups deserving of equal respect and consideration is misconceived given the demographic context. Jews are only 2% of the US population whereas goyim make up the 98%. Yet, Jews are due equal standing in matters of national interest? It’d be like pretending Hanukkah is as important as Christmas in the Christian World, but then whom are we kidding? So many Americans have been brainwashed into honoring Hanukkah nearly as much as Christmas. Even though a 50/50 standing between Jews and Gentiles is vastly disproportionate given the demographic imbalance, even that would be preferable to the current situation where the 2% usually runs roughshod over the 98% that’s as hapless as the countless Hindus ruled by a handful of Brits in the heyday of Empire. One thing for sure, there’s no way a society that is 98% Jewish and 2% Christian/Gentile would recognize both groups as nearly on par.
An example of the near-impossibility of a middle ground between Jews and goyim was illustrated in the exchange between Carrie-Anne Prejean and the various Jewish Supremacists in the so-called Religious Liberty Commission. Prejean learned you cannot discuss anything in good faith with people who only care about their own kind with zero regard for others. For the Jewish supremacists, it’s “our way or the highway”, never “meet you halfway”. Instead of two sides arriving at a compromise, it’s about one side kowtowing to the other.
The Jews in the commission charged that ‘antisemitism’ is about singling out the Jews for criticism when nothing can be further from the truth. In the US and the West in general, it’s fair game to bash Russia(its government, its culture, its people, its values, its history), China, Iran, the Arab World, Latin America, Northern Europeans, Southern Europeans, so-called WASPs, ‘white trash’ & hillbillies(and of course anyone suspected of ‘white supremacism’), Christians, Muslims, and on and on. Matt Walsh, the white cuck maggot who anal-licks his boss Ben Shapiro, routinely whines about the Muslims. The late Charlie Kirk had nothing but gushing things to say about Jews until the very end of his life, but he routinely bashed Muslims and had some harsh things to say about blacks. Politicians of both parties shamelessly fueled paranoia about resurgent Russian imperialism, Yellow Peril fears of China buying up the farmland, Muslim terrorist under every bed, the specter of ‘white supremacist’ Christo-Nazi takeover, and/or the brown tide from south of the border drowning America. Ann Coulter’s book ADIOS AMERICA is a litany of insults against just about every immigrant group… except, you guessed it, the Jews, such as those from the ex-Soviet Union who were involved in so much gangsterism and scams.
So, what usually goes by the label of ‘antisemitism’, far from targeting ONLY the Jews, argues that Jews should be open to criticism and scrutiny like any other group. Jews have no qualms about fear-mongering about Russia, scapegoating the Chinese, spreading wild rumors about Iran getting nukes to blow up US cities(LOL), Arabs being a bunch of cutthroat barbarians, and of course Whites all being ‘racist’ and Christians all being closet Jew-haters. If Jews feel it’s their right to dump on others, why should they be spared from others returning the favor? Besides, Jews today aren’t half-starving refugees from Nazi death camps but members of the richest and most powerful group that uses cuck puppet politicians to wage mass-murderous wars on their behalf and are engaged in all-out genocide in Gaza.
On the matter of Zionism, Jewish Supremacists say it’s unjust and hateful to deny Jews the right of homeland when other peoples’ homelands are respected. But Zionism isn’t merely about the Jewish desire for a homeland. It’s about Jews building their homeland on the land of another people. If Jews had purchased an uninhabited chunk of Australia, Canada, or some such place in the Middle East or Africa, no one would have given a damn. But Jews chose Palestine with the intention of displacing its natives.
Now, given their historical roots in what’s called the Holy Land, the Jewish wish to build a nation there was understandable, but the people called the ‘Palestinians’ have been there for just as long if not longer than the Jews, and therefore, if Jews were going to settle there, the only just option was in good terms and mutual understanding with the Palestinians. But Jews chose to erase Palestine to build Israel. It’s like the world recognizes the Poles to have a homeland but in Poland, not in Hungary or Thailand. Germans have a right to a homeland but in Germany, not in Poland or Russia. Zionists bitch about goyim denying the right of a Jewish homeland when they themselves denied the Palestinians the right of homeland on the very land they’d been living on for centuries or millennia.
But it’s even worse than that. Zionists disingenuously kvetch about Jews being the ONLY PEOPLE denied a homeland by the ‘Anti-Semites’, but Jewish Power has been hard-at-work at subverting and effectively dismantling all goy homelands. Neocon foreign policy made a total wreck of Libya and Syria. Those are hardly countries anymore but wastelands run by warlords and religious lunatics. Jews in Japan are pressuring the country to take in millions of immigrants, celebrate diversity, and worship Negrolatry & GloboHomo. And Jews have been at the forefront of the Great Replacement across the West, the promotion of anti-white ideology, the encouragement of race-mixing, and even the retro-fitting of Western History so that movies and TV shows routinely depict European History as Negronic. Just about every TV show on the Norsemen have black vikings or vikangz. Such propaganda has become so pervasive that even goy writers and directors now feel compelled to tell European historical tales with Negroes in key roles. The Jewish supremacist BS is tiresome as usual.
RSS
