The Deforestation of the Mind: Uprooting of the Western Soul and the Globalist Deluge

 

Hills stripped of trees eventually collapse into mudslides. Without deep roots to contain the soil and without leaves to soften the rain, hillsides without trees invariably wash away in mudslides with horrible consequences. We’ve all been informed of the importance of nature and forests. If nature is despoiled for short-term gain, the chain-reaction of destruction can cause irreparable harm.
Not only are the trees gone but the animals, plants, and other organisms that depend on them. And then, other organisms that depend on those organisms also become endangered. As humans ultimately rely on nature, short-term gain can turn into long-term loss, even the destruction of mankind. Entire civilizations perished due to their short-sighted plundering of nature.

What goes for nature also goes for the mind. Mental health can be destroyed like nature. The removal of something essential and indispensable from the mind sets off a destructive series of ‘events’. It reverberates far beyond the initial impact and harm. It’s like the removal of an essential organ affects the entire body, one detrimental effect leading to another then another. What goes for the body goes for the mind, which is really part of the body.

When the mind is ‘deforested’ of what makes people essentially moral, spiritual, cultural, and thoughtful, the human soul no longer binds as one. Bereft of meaning, sound standards, depth of reference, and true conviction, the mind turns into mush or mud that can be molded into anything. The mind goes from precious metal to malleable plastic.

Such fluidity of mind is rarely, if ever, the facilitator of true freedom and individuality. Mud-minds and plastic-brains are almost always molded by forces that disparage tradition in favor of fashion, the choice instrument of mass manipulation. Because their conscious(and subconscious) spaces are not held together by forests of the mind with roots in family, culture, history, and spirituality, their semblances of thoughts, feelings, and decisions are like so many mudslides or mental diarrhea.

A properly cultured mind requires something more than standard education, especially if education has been reduced to indoctrination in the latest ‘intellectual’ fads aimed at impressionable young ones with single-mothers or soulless parents whose idea of culture is Pop Culture and whose idea of values come from the corrupt Jewish-monopoly media(elite and mass. Given the sheer mindlessness and mendacity that are passed off as intellectual thought or ideological priorities in the Current West, it’s obvious hat intelligence and knowledge alone won’t save anyone’s mind and soul.

Intelligence is merely a tool and often caves to emotions. Intelligence seeks the truth only when directed towards it. When people with intelligence are instilled, especially at impressionable periods and/or vulnerable moments in their lives, with strong emotions in relation to myths, fantasies, falsehoods, or disingenuous narratives, the element of sheer passion overrides facts and reason.

For example, just how did so many intelligent people come to believe in the divinity of Jesus over the centuries? Because Christianity had such an emotional, cultural, and spiritual hold on them. Why did so many highly intelligent people become swept up, rather unthinkingly(or monomaniacally), with Marxism/Communism? It wasn’t only the conceit of partaking of a movement that supposedly figured everything out and unified all relevant knowledge but the radical conviction that one was on the side of angels or historical justice.
And yet, given the nobility of Jesus’s teachings and the power of Karl Marx’s vision, those who wholeheartedly accepted the Christian Faith or Communist Destiny were not necessarily deforested of the mind, at least not entirely so. Whatever harm that the religion of Christianity or the ideology of Communism may have done to the human psyche, it also planted new seeds that could grow into trees of meaning, understanding, redemption, and/or justice. Neither was animated by nihilism, hedonism, or degeneracy.

But take a look at our world. We see women with green, purple, or pink hair. Such numbnuts now come in all types and ages. They aren’t always silly teens trying to be ‘different’ but middle-aged women. Why would a full-grown woman do such a thing to her hair? If a 10 yr old girl made herself look like Cyndi Lauper or some cartoon figure, it might be ‘cute’.
But why would full-grown women, especially one with college degrees and professional responsibilities(and with family and children), go about doing stupid things to their hair(or getting ugly tattoos)? (Granted, such women tend to be ‘cat ladies’ than women with families, but then, there is no lack of trashy mothers either.)

Why would so many people, parents and children, defile and sully their bodies with ugly tattoos? What goes on in their minds when they decide on such acts of folly? Don’t they have a larger sense of life, i.e. what is ‘cool’ today maybe ‘fool’ tomorrow.
Even if they are only stuck in the Moment, why would anyone with even a smidgen of sense believe that he or she looks better with body graffiti that are invariably stupid, vulgar, and trashy? I can understand some primitive tribes where tattoos carry cultural significance. Or someone who’s been to hell and back in war and got a tattoo to signal camaraderie with his band of brothers. But what exactly is the meaning of tattoos to the fools who decide to splatter their bodies with in-erasable ugliness?

What’s done to the body is decided by the mind, and one wonders why so many people in the West(and in their satellites) have fallen into the habit of harboring dumb thoughts and fetishes that usually lead to disastrous results. (What tattoos are to skin, various illicit drugs are to the soul. Kicks and highs are offered as substitutes for meaning and health.)

Obviously, both stupid ‘cat ladies’ with funny-colored hair and morons obsessed with tattoos possess mud-minds. They are putty in the hands of globalist Jews who fill up their minds with the latest fads, cultural and political.
Unlike status-anxious brown-nosing politicians who toe the latest Party Line for opportunism, so many in so-called ‘woke’ community hysterically espouse the latest crusade or craze with zero awareness that, not so long ago, they hadn’t a care or a clue on the topic. Their ex-lax minds slide and flow with whatever BS is cooked up by the Media Machine.

Evidently in their formative years, their minds were not planted with trees bearing the fruits of truth and meaning. Instead, the baleful influence of the 2 PC’s, Political Correctness and Pop Culture, uprooted whatever that was nascent & normal, decent, and healthy. In their stead, toxins were injected and plastic trees(with only the semblance of the real thing) were planted.
For sure, ‘Gay marriage’ is to real marriage what a plastic tomato is to a real tomato. No, ‘love is love’ is not true love. Homo fecal-penetration is not equal in worth, meaning, and purpose to the true sexuality that produced all the life in the world since the beginning of time.

As such, the generations especially from the Boomers onward(and gone full-retard with the Millennials) have the kinds of minds that can be mud-slid into oblivion. Little that is deep, meaningful, and true clings to them. Their minds tend to be vulnerable & defenseless, so gullible and eloping with the latest stupidity.
How else can one explain monstrosities such as ‘gay marriage’, the dementia of Afrophilia or Negrolatry(as if blacks, the most criminal race, are a bunch of saints), the ludicrousness of Jew-Worship(as if Zionists need protection from the countless Palestinians and Muslims terrorized by the Wars for Israel), and the clown-world notion that a man is a ‘woman’ simply because he feels like it.

What are the factors that hold a mind together and maintain its resistance to the decadent, even degenerate, fads and fashions that now define so much of the 2 PC’s, pop culture and political correctness?
What allows for a healthy ecosystem of the mind, a kind of psycho-system, one that can weather and survive the winds, rain, and hailstorms of Corrupt and Venal Power?

A strong sense of individuality is surely one but not in the libertarian sense that each individual should consider himself/herself as the center of the universe or idolize the great individual(usually some business tycoon) as godlike and beyond reproach.

No, every individual is part of a link, an inheritor of a legacy. We are surrounded with things that we, as individuals, didn’t create. While we are more than ants in a colony, we are similar to ants in that we are bound to a larger community. Individuality is priceless, but we need to understand and appreciate that we are part of a family, culture, history, spirituality, and territory.
Even for the non-religious, certain spiritual ideas beneficially restrain excesses of hubris or hysteria. For know-it-all intellectuals and brainiacs, God as a metaphor can serve as a reminder of the limitations of human knowledge and achievement. The concept of God can also be beneficial to those with a heavy tendency toward arousal or sensualism: A contract or consensus among ‘arousalists’ that there must be something more meaningful and deeper than the tingly pleasures of the flesh. Without the concept of God or something equivalent, too many people are prone to self-worship, arrogance, mammon, or fervor of the moment(aka the Current Year).

Global Warming Hysteria is one such example. While global warming caused by CO2 may indeed be a problem, the sheer absolute certainty bordering on quasi-millenarianism among its proselytizers is truly a sight to behold. Instead of offering up better science and data with cool minds, they act as though they are 100% certain that UNLESS things go their way, it’s End of the World for sure in a few decades. If anything is heating up real fast, it’s their self-righteousness. While serious concern for the environment is laudable, especially as humans have despoiled much of the planet, the sheer arrogance of certainty bordering on megalomania(or ‘megalogaia’) suggests that what is sadly lacking in their lives is a true sense of spirituality.

The forest of the mind needs real connection to family(even bordering on sentimentality as it is only within the family that one is allowed unabashed emotions that are essential to life), and this means having a man who knows what it is to be a father and a woman who knows what it is to be a mother. And this familial sense must be expansive as the concept of the nuclear family, though useful in the modern setting, tends to over-emphasize one’s own family and its independence from kinfolk. The nuclear family is convenient and desirable in that each family is guaranteed its freedom and agency. Just like we, as individuals, want our private spaces, most families prefer their own separate spaces.

Still, family bonds within and without are much richer when there is a larger sense of connection and communication among relatives including grandparents, uncles, aunts, cousins, nephews, and nieces. There needs to be ways of communication, meetings, gatherings, rituals, and remembrance that remind everyone that he or she isn’t alone in the world or isn’t primarily part of some faddish subculture but is instead a part of a deep lineage. This used to be taken for granted in the past, but with so many children being an only-child, raised by single-parents(or even grandmothers or foster homes), and addicted to pop culture(and deracinated by PC), we can no longer take for granted the sense of belonging and obligations that come with Familial-Consciousness.

The forest of the mind also needs true spirituality. There are several true religions of great reach and depth. If one finds it impossible to literally believe in God or gods in the modern era(and this would include myself), we can still appreciate the old religions and mythologies for their striving and meaning. One doesn’t have to be Jewish, Christian, Muslim, Hindu, Buddhist, or Greco-paganist to draw inspiration from the faiths and fables that served as the visionary and spiritual bedrock of entire civilizations.
While it is only natural to seek new meanings in our world of rapid change, one mustn’t confuse the latest fad or fervor as a worthy substitute for the great religions and myths of the past. While it’s possible that there will be new prophets and revelations in times to come, they most certainly won’t be the products of the Current Power whose main(even sole) priority is to hog all the wealth and privilege for itself. Then, it’s no wonder that the Power has been so hard at work in deforesting the hearts-and-souls of modern folks to be washed away like mudslides under the barrage of globalist PC and Pop Culture.

The forest of the mind also needs real culture and true sensibility, just like the body needs real food and real nutrients. While candy, doughnuts, and ice-cream are acceptable as occasional snacks, they’re not to be confused with real food, the kind with proteins and vitamins.
Similarly, a civilization with pop culture as its main culture is like someone who mainly gorges on junk food and candy as his/her main diet. Why is our culture so sick(and sickly), fatuous, disgusting, imbecile, retarded, infantile, and/or excessive? It’s due to the decline in sensibility, indeed to the point where even the (so-called) experts cannot tell real culture from junk culture.
Consider the risible rise of Pop Art in the art world. Consider how superhero comic book movies have come to dominate the discourse about cinema. Consider how the biggest literary events are stuff like HARRY POTTER, HUNGER GAMES, TWILIGHT, FIFTY SHADES OF GRAY, or some teen or teen-inspired fiction. People who don’t know real culture from junk culture have lost the forest of the mind. Their minds are like the hills of Haiti that’s been stripped of trees and overruns with mud when it pours.
By the way, Real Culture is much more than high or serious culture. It’s about the art of living, sense of family and obligations, preservation of meaningful rites & rituals, sense of history & continuity, and a moral sense. Modernity’s fixation on exhibitionism in all things have narrowly defined culture as arts and entertainment when it’s really a way of life.

Much more can be said on this subject, and this is only a start. But one thing for sure, we need an Arbor’s Day of the mind. We need to sow the seeds and plant the trees of truth, meaning, culture, and justice within our psyche. By ‘truth’, we mean the poison weeds of false narratives planted in our minds by the capitalist-globalist Jewish-monopoly media must be pulled out.
And by ‘justice’, we need something sounder than the Tri-Idolatry that elevates Jews, Homos, and Negroes as the most sacred groups whom all others must worship and serve.
What is the SJW(social justice warrior) or JJ(Justice Junkie) dogma really about? It’s not about justice based on truth, facts, reason, and reciprocity but about hysteria based on idol-worshiping of certain groups(Jews, blacks, and homos) as the sole arbiters of wisdom and holiness. It’s a form of inverted supremacism that, while denouncing ‘white supremacism’, goes full blast in promoting Jews, blacks, and homos as more worthy than other groups. Just ask the Palestinians.

We must de-salinize our minds of the poison salt of PC. We must remove the fake plastic plants of pop culture. And in their place, we must plant the trees of true meaning and conviction. Otherwise, our minds will be piles of mud that will not hold against the deluge of globalist pap and rot.

And we need self-realization and self-actualization more than ever because even the institutions of True Religions are now in the hands of the globalist agents who, wittingly or not, are aiding and abetting in the deforestation of the mind to turn all of our souls into one collective mud-flood flowing into the cesspool of mammonite idolatry of Jews, homos, and Negroes.

Donald Trump may have been useful as a monkey wrench tossed into the globalist machine, but he too is a depraved creature of depraved times, one where even the majority of so-called ‘conservatives’ are okay with ‘gay marriage’ and pander to the worship of the Holy Three. ‘Gulliberals’ and ‘Cuckservatives’ constitute the mainstream positions in the Age of Mud.

We need a garden of true liberals and true conservatives who complement one another in the preservation and progress of a sane and sound society. And such a mind garden can only be created out of a true forest with real trees of knowledge and remembrance. In this age of degenerates, we need the re-emergence of the regenerates.

The Technique of ‘Threading’ in Dominating the Discourse(and the Paradox of Normality)

Why do Jewish and homo — or Jomo — elites wield so much power? There are several obvious reasons: wealth, talent, organization, aggressiveness, victimology, and control of media/academia/entertainment. But there is another factor to their effectiveness: they are so persuasive because they are so pervasive.

Than merely putting forth their views and agendas as standalone arguments and issues, they ‘thread’ them into subjects and things that apparently have little or no relation to them. Take the issue of ‘global warming’. There have been many discussions and documentaries on the matter, but the reason why it became such an obsessive topic — at least before the global temperatures leveled off, whereupon the crisis was renamed ‘climate change’ — among ‘progressives’ and young people(who are impressionable and subjected to barrages of ‘educational’ materials via school and media) owes something to Liberalism’s pervasiveness with everything it touches. For example, the issue of global warming was ‘threaded’ into just about every topic the Liberals could get their hands on. A good example is the documentary THE FORTRESS OF THE BEAR. Now, I’m not going to discuss the veracity of the global warming issue. I have no idea how true or false it is, but we know that it’s been highly politicized by both sides, and the debate has become as much about pride and purse-strings as about science and climate. The relevant issue here is that a documentary about brown bears is threaded with the topic of global warming. So, even those who don’t want to hear about global warming and just want to watch a documentary about bears cannot get away from the issue. To be sure, there is nothing wrong with discussing a particular subject in relation to other subjects, because, after all, everything is connected to other things one way or another. No man or animal is an island unto himself or itself. The pollution we create here can affect living forms halfway around the globe. The collapse of one economy can shake the world economy. Nevertheless, there is something specious about how the Liberal community will take some hot topic issue and then try to thread it into just about everything. It can even turn into parody, as when some social critics remarked that bad behavior among American blacks owed to global warming. Despite having evolved to survive and handle the heat of sub-Saharan Africa, it seems blacks flip out at even the slightest rise in temperature.
“Is it higher [in Chicago]? Yes. Last year, we hit a record number of murders from guns, and this year, we were already outpacing last year’s numbers. Now, there are contributing factors that are not under anybody’s control, and it may seem odd, but it is factually true, one of them is actually the weather. There is a dramatic increase in gun violence when it is warmer, and we are having this climate-change effect that is driving that.”

Well, if the daughter of Hugh Hefner says so, it must be true. I wonder what accounts for the demise of PLAYBOY enterprise. Does the rise in temperature sap people’s sexual appetite?
Anyway, all this threading of a hot button issue into just about everything makes it pervasive to the point where you cannot get away it even if you wanted to. It’s like adding corn syrup or MSG to every food product so that you can’t avoid even if you wanted to.
And Liberals chose to thread the issue of global warming into documentaries about bears because it’s an easy to pull at viewers’ heartstrings; after all, we all grew up with teddy bears. Liberals know that an issue, no matter how fraught with urgency and significance, cannot gain emotional traction without holy victims. Since most of the developing world is against Western Liberal initiatives to reduce greenhouse gases, it’s a rather hard sell to make the non-white world the poster-boy of victimization due to global warming. Also, since the most dramatic changes happened in the Arctic region, Liberals sought to capitalize on them by showing how global warming was leading to the holocaust of bears and other species in the region. So, if you tuned into nature documentaries in the past 15 years, you probably heard sermons upon sermons about global warming even in programs focusing on other main topics. The issue has been made so pervasive that it became second nature among the knee-jerk ‘progressive’ crowd. I mean how can it not be true when everywhere they look and hear, they hear ‘global warming’, ‘global warming’ and ‘global warming’? Similarly, we cannot get away from the immigration debate since Liberals tell us that just about everything — the well-being and the advancement of the economy, morality and ethics, science and technology, innovation, entertainment, love life, quality of food, and etc. — is dependent on the passing of amnesty. If it doesn’t pass, ours will be an evil neo-Nazi nation, the economy will collapse, America will lose in science/technology to China and Mexico, we will have only white bread and water to eat, our schools will fail, innovation will come to a halt, and so on and so on.

Liberals thread their hot button issues into every fabric of American life and enterprise. The biggest and craziest hysteria today is ‘gay is beautiful’. So, even movies that seem to have nothing to do with homosexuality will have homo characters — shown in the best light, of course. At a beauty pageant, a contestant will be asked nicely if she supports ‘gay marriage’, and if her answer is no, she will be attacked viciously by the entire Jomo elite media. The Jomo elites feature images of the ‘gay flag’ as a kind of visual editorial day in and day out. Thus, even if the written coverage of a story may be reasonably ‘objective’, the accompanying photo of the ‘gay flag’ that associates fecal penetration and sex-change operation(involving mutilation and removal of perfectly healthy organs)with the rainbow essentially promotes the homo agenda. Here’s a good example of the photo that the Chicago Tribune used as its Facebook page’s cover photo.

It looks like just a nice winter image, but look at the ‘gay rainbow’ umbrella. It’s getting so that one cannot even enjoy a winter image without some homo propaganda slipped into it. How would Jews feel if every other image in the media had a Crucifix stuck in it somewhere? Or take the oreo homo cookie.

Homos complained about the backlash against the cookie ad, but those who objected likely suffered a far worse backlash(or backdoorlash), whereupon they were likely forced to bend over to be politically rammed in the ass by the filthy homo lobby as they compelled to apologize — or lose their jobs.. Incidentally, if homos want to associate their ‘pride’ — or ‘poo-ride’ as it really should be called — with pastries and sweets, wouldn’t fudge have been the more obvious choice? They can pack as much fudge down their throats or up their poop holes for all I care. And speaking of bakeries, the lunacy of ‘gay marriage’ is forcing decent bakery owners to make ‘gay wedding’ cakes. You cannot even own a bakery without being forced to have it associated with the demands of the dirty homo community backed by the vicious Jews elites. (Using this logic, Jewish-American publishers should be forced to publish Alexander Solzhenitsyn’s TWO HUNDRED YEARS TOGETHER since freedom of speech is part of the American way, and homo fashion designers should be forced to weave clothes for an anti-homosexual organization; and an advertising company owned by Jews and/or homos should be forced to run ads by groups they despise or hate by the force of law. If indeed a Christian baker must bake filthy ‘gay marriage’ cakes for homos, then a black baker should be forced to bake KKK cakes since the KKK is a legal organization protected under American law. But of course, Jews, homos, and Negroes get to do as they please whereas white Christians must bend over to the homos and suck Jewish penis.) As far as hideous Jews are concerned, anyone who notices the venal nature of Jewish power and/or the filthy aspect of homo agenda is mentally ill with some ‘rabid paranoia’ or some kind of a ‘phobia’. What is truly amazing is that so many people — including so many conservatives — have bought into bogusness, which goes to show that people can be made to believe in anything. Indeed why not when so many primitive tribes convinced themselves that horribly scarring their bodies is some holy ritual and when the highly civilized Chinese convinced themselves for over a thousand years that women with mangled feet(as the result of foot-binding) are beautiful and sexy. The blank slate theory may be false, but ‘soft clay’ theory seems to be true. Though there are natural default traits rooted in our DNA, they can be molded and twisted out of shape to make people value the dumbest things... .like tongue piercing, a gross stupidity that has gone mainstream. If human minds can be molded for over a thousand years into believing that mangled feet are sexy — and normal female feet are ugly — , then why should it be surprising if so many people have been mind-molded into thinking homosexuality is about the rainbow and not about fecal penetration. It’s all about WHO HAS THE POWER TO ESTABLISH IDEALS AND ENFORCE TABOOS. Such manipulations can be so powerful that even natural tendencies — that favor healthy normal feet over mangled ones — can be overridden. (In a paradoxical way, normality can pave the way for prevalence of the worst kind of abnormal craziness. There are two meanings to normality: one rooted in nature and one molded by social pressure. Thus, even though nature makes most people prefer healthy feet over mangled feet, social ideals and pressures — linked so closely to status and respect — can make people prefer the mangled feet over the natural feet. Because humans are naturally social animals, it’s normal for them to want to be accepted and approved; everyone fears being ostracized and shunned. But this very normal human trait can make people submit to the most abnormal and asinine things. If the ruling elites are a bunch of decadent pervert-parasites, they can mold the ‘new normal’ and promote it through propaganda and turn it into dogma; they can also enforce taboos against those who don’t comply, and they can use their social might to ostracize and ridicule those who refuse to conform. Even though the individuals who reject the ‘new normal’ are closer to the natural norm, they will be made to suffer socially, and their example will be used to frighten most people who normally wanted to be accepted and approved by the powers-that-be and by the ‘mainstream’ that has been reshaped according to the dictates of the ‘new normal’. Thus, this normal fear of being exiled or destroyed can make a lot of normal people into mindless slaves of the elites who push the ‘new normal’, and Jews understand this aspect of psychology. Consider two ten year old boys Billy and Bobby, and suppose they belong to the 97% of boys who are real-sexual or straight. Suppose neither has been subjected to PC dogma, and you go to Billy and ask, "Billy, what did you do this morning?" Billy answers, "I woke up and went to the bathroom." "What did you do in the bathroom?" "Well, I used the toilet." "And what happened?" "Shit came out of my poo-poo hole." "Now, Billy, how would you feel about Bobby sticking his wee-wee into your poop hole?" Billy will grimace and shout, "Gross! That is so sick!" Such a response is the natural norm. Of course, we can, as responsible adults, inform Billy that some small percentage of boys are born with female tendencies and want to have sex with other boys, and since boys don’t have vaginas, these peculiar males stick their penises into the anuses of other males. We can tell Billy that they are born that way and should be left alone. In contrast, consider the ‘new normal’ agenda in the school. The children are shown images of homos in the most positive light. Children are told to draw pictures associating homos with the rainbow, and the student with the ‘best illustration’ is praised to high heaven by the PC teacher. The message is sent to all the kids that one must worship homos to be a good person. Also, the teacher keeps railing against ‘homophobia’ over and over, thus reminding the kids that one’s mind is twisted and sick if one doesn’t worship homos and approve of what they do. Since it’s normal for kids to wanted to be liked and approved by adults and their peers — who’ve been similarly brainwashed — , most normal kids will end up embracing the most abnormal kind of craziness. In such times, the crazy tend to be saner than the normal because crazy people don’t care about conforming to society. It’s like the Klaus Kinski character in DOCTOR ZHIVAGO. He’s clearly deranged, but that’s what makes him relatively freer than other men. He’s so crazy that he doesn’t care what other people think or what the authorities do to him. Saner people, out of the normal tendency for self-preservation, eagerly embrace the ‘new normal’ even if it’s crazy communism or homo worship. In a world gone nuts, crazy is the new sane.)
Indeed, if you discuss homosexuality in relation to its sexual act, homos and their allies get all Victorian-like and talk as if you committed a foul deed, like breaking wind in public. Never mind that all you’ve done is describe what homos actually do. So, we are supposed to ignore what homos do in the form of ‘sex’ and instead associate their identity with rainbows and the ‘gay’ style. It’s no wonder that homos prefer to be called ‘gay’ than homo or homosexual. They want to distract us from the true nature of their foul ways of ‘sex’ because there isn’t much real pride in poo-ride. Thus, to make homosexuality more palatable to Americans, its ‘sexual’ and physical nature has been suppressed whereas its outward manifestations — colorful flags, angelic smiles of homo actors and celebrities on TV, and etc. — are sprinkled all over. It’s funny how Liberals take pride in yelling VAGINA and in having Vagina Monologues, but they freak out when we talk about the (mis)use of the anus by homosexuals; they don’t want us to have monologues or dialogues about the homo asshole that has seventeen times the likelihood of contracting anal cancer than the normal anus that doesn’t engage in such behavior. It’s ironic that the perversity of the homo movement has been thrust onto the national stage in the mode of clean-cut and white-bread(or white buns) 1950s FATHER KNOWS BEST TV show. Homos are presented as the new white bread. Perversion is the new decency. Anti-normalists and normophobes now have the power to pass judgement on people who still believe in the hierarchy of values. But of course, the ‘new normal’ — as the Jomo elites call it — is very selective for it doesn’t promote just any kind of deviancy. ‘Marriage equality’ doesn’t mean the right of ‘same family marriage’ or polygamy(or multiple partner) pride parades in NY, Chicago, or San Francisco. It just means the privilege of only the homos to rewrite marriage laws and pervert the values intrinsic to the very notion of marriage as a civilizational principle.

Anyway, the homo stuff is threaded into everything. So, DESPICABLE ME 2 has the Minions — who are ostensibly male as far we can tell — cross-dressing like transsexuals. And the movie ends with a wedding celebrated by Minions in Village People outfits singing "YMCA". Though the wedding is between man and woman, the song-and-dance is ‘gay’, as if to suggest that even real marriages must be ‘gay-friendly’. Once such threading has become part of the mainstream discourse, everyone gets into the act to be part of the fashionable scene. So, J.K. Rowling ‘outs’ a character as ‘gay’. As I haven’t read any Potter books or seen any Potter movies(except for 15 minutes of the one directed by Alfonso Cuaron which was enough!), I don’t know what relevance the character’s r place in the story has to do with fecal penetration or sucking another man’s penis. So, why should his ‘sexual orientation’ even be an issue? But for some reason, Rowling and her Jomo elites made it an issue, and all the kids hooked to HARRY POTTER stories — and who have grown up admiring of Dumbledore or Dumblebackdore — were instantly persuaded to think ‘gay is cool’. And Girl Scouts used to be about camping, having fun, and learning to be good girls. Today, it’s a indoctrination center that teaches young girls to embrace political correctness, hate whiteness, and worship lesbians. And with the Boy Scouts going pro-homo too, it will soon teach kids that it’s wonderful to be ‘gay’.

While it’s important to teach the virtue of tolerance in a free and democratic society, it’s quite another to elevate something perverted as being of equal value or worth with something that has essential value. Worse, it’s a moral crime to elevate something like homosexuality even higher than real sexuality and real marriage that produce life and morally obligate the creators of life to commit to the raising of the life they’ve created.
If we follow the logic of ‘gay marriage’, there is no special bond between parents and children. We might as well look upon humans as we do dogs. After all, we see nothing wrong with snatching puppies away from their real canine parents and having humans raise them. The logic of ‘gay marriage’ and ‘gay family’ means that we shouldn’t promote any kind of special bond between parent and child. As homos cannot produce life through homo ‘sex’, they must snatch children from real-sexuals in order to have a ‘gay family’. So, a homo guy will have to shut his eyes and have sex with a woman and then demand that the woman remove herself from the life of her own kid who is to be raised with his ‘gay’ partner. Or a lesbian will have to shut her eyes and be humped by a guy and then demand the guy to remove himself from the life of his kid who is to be raised with her lesbian partner. Of course, some men and women willingly remove themselves from the lives of their own children in order to serve the demands of homos(who insist on raising the kids in a ‘gay family’), but that just goes to show how utterly decadent and worthless liberalism has become.
In the case of adoption, the orphan, instead of being placed in a household that best resembles the very reason for his or her existence — the union of woman-mother and man-father — is placed in a house with ‘two daddies’(who act like freaks and stick each other in the anus) or ‘two mommies’. So, children might as well be seen as commodities like puppies in the window. But this is to be expected in a society where so many people think and act like dogs.
Consider the Pavlovian trick pulled off by the Jomo elite in the creation and promotion of the ‘gay flag’. A sound of a bell has nothing to do with food, but Pavlov showed that a dog can be made to associate the bell with food. Similarly, the beautiful rainbow has nothing to do with two guys ejaculating inside fecal holes or two women rubbing their holes together in a funny parody of sex. The rainbow has nothing to do with a man who opts to have his penis cut off and have it replaced by a fake vagina, followed by massive injections of artificial hormones. But the Jomo elite media have so often associated homosexuality with the rainbow ‘gay flag’ that when people see a rainbow — real, illustrated, or woven — , they think, "Ahhhh, what a lovely image of angelic and darling gays." How pathetic that adult Americans who graduated from college can be manipulated as easily as toddlers watching TELETUBBIES, which, let’s face it, IS homo propaganda for little ones.

Of course, since the 1960s, nothing was threaded into more narratives than the issue of ‘racism’. So, even characters who weren’t originally — or plausibly — black in the source material were made to be black in the movies or TV shows. And this became so pervasive as a narrative practice that many writers felt obligated to ‘include’ obligatory ‘diversity’ in their stories even if the results didn’t reflect the social reality. Or consider a film like WHEN A MAN LOVES A WOMAN — sold as a romantic drama — that veers into a series of ‘teachable moments’ that would has us believe that even patience and supportiveness are really forms of white male privilege and patriarchy when exhibited by a white male of course. You see, if white males are responsible and supportive, they make others dependent on them, and that too is a form of patriarchal domination. But it’s really a "damned-if-you, damned-if-you-don’t" situation for white males. They are on the wrong side no matter what they do. If a white male were to tell others to stop leaning on him and feeding off him and do their own thing, he would be accused of being uncaring, cold, selfish, and insensitive. But if he’s caring and supportive, he is guilty of making others dependent on his strength/responsibility, which is a kind of oppressive power. Needless to say, WHEN A MAN LOVES A WOMAN was written by two dirty Jews, Ronald Bass and Al Franken.
Consider CLEAR AND PRESENT DANGER where the CIA director was made into a Magic Negro guy played by James Earl Jones with the burly tones. It’s especially ludicrous because we are supposed to admire a CIA director(of all people) as the moral conscience of the film! William Casey, who was probably the inspiration for the character in the novel, was loathed by the Liberal community, but with a Magic Negro taking his role, it was as if the CIA could indeed be a fountain of trust, honor, and wisdom. It’s like imagining MLK as CIA director, but of course, we mean MLK the myth as MLK the man was as devious, shrewd, lowdown, and dirty as J. Edgar Hoover, if not more so. Even the most cynical and anti-establishment Liberal starts feeling lumps in his throat and wee-wees in his pants when the Man with the Power happens to be a Negro, which is why the Jews pulled a good one with Obama. With Magic Negro Obama at the helm, the ‘progressive’ community was muted in their criticism of government’s subservience to Jewish-owned Wall Street and US foreign policy. Gee, I mean it might be ‘racist’ not to support a president who is black or mulatto.

The issue of ‘racism’ has been threaded into just about everything. So, even the discussion of Thanksgiving turkey dinner could make a dirty Jew like Ron Rosenbaum throw a hissy fit about the ‘racism’ of preferring white meat. Environmentalists got some traction in the 90s by threading the issue of ‘racism’ to their concerns, leading to endless charges of ‘environmental racism’, that is until a University of Chicago study showed that black people were not subject to higher levels of pollution. To be sure, some in the Jewish community were probably not happy with the notion of ‘environmental racism’ since they have such a huge stake in real estate, and if the charge were to stick, a lot of rich property-developing-and-trading Jews would have to answer for them.
If some forms of threading is obvious and blatant, others are more subtle and unexpected. It’s like a marketing ploy where you are sold on one line of goods only to discover that you’re being hoodwinked to buy something else. It’s like Congressmen adding extraneous items to a bill that has little or nothing to do with them. It’s like ordering a vegetarian dish only to find out that meat products have been added. If you let your kid join the Boy Scouts to learn about scout honor and camping, he could also be drummed with lessons on the angelic virtues of homos.
And from tolerance of homos, the PC dogma will demand serf-like subservience to homo neo-aristocrats. Just like Jews, deep in their heart, think in terms of ‘effendism’, homos think in terms of ‘boofendism’. For Jews and homos, it’s not enough that they should be tolerated by us. It’s not enough for us to respect their rights as individuals. We must worship and serve their supremacist agendas. While an American atheist doesn’t demand that all religious people love & worship him and while an American Christian doesn’t demand that all atheists kneel before him & worship his God, Jews and homos say it’s not enough for us to tolerate them; we must ‘welcome’ them, which means we must serve and worship them while they eat like effendi or boofendi.

Israeli Sephardic leader Rabbi Ovadia Yosef in his weekly Saturday night sermon said that non-Jews exist to serve Jews. “Goyim were born only to serve us. Without that, they have no place in the world; only to serve the People of Israel,” he said during a public discussion of what kind of work non-Jews are allowed to perform on Shabbat. "Why are gentiles needed? They will work, they will plow, they will reap. We will sit like an effendi and eat," he said to some laughter.

While most Jews are not religious and don’t literally believe that God created Jews and goyim for this purpose, their world-view, outlook, and attitude are in line with the words of the vile Jew Rabbi. One only needs to look at the political, cultural, moral, economic, and international affairs of America and Europe to notice that Jews — and their mini-me elites the homos — feel this way about us. We should serve them while they sit and eat like effendi or boofendi — ‘boof’ being a slang for ass-humping for those in the dark.

At any rate, we need to make a distinction between paradigm-ing and threading. In the film DR. AKAGI(aka KANZO SENSEI meaning Dr. Liver) by Shohei Imamura, a certain Japanese doctor is so obsessed with the liver as the source of all health and sickness that he tends to pattern-ize everything into something liver-ish. The film even begins with American pilots approaching Japan that looks like a diseased liver from above, and the film ends with an atomic cloud that takes on the semblance of a liver. With the eccentric doctor, his paradigmatically liver-ish view of everything — health, disease, humanity, society, history, etc. — is sincere. He isn’t trying to dupe anyone, and he honestly believes that the cure for everything, medical or social, is somehow related to the liver as a organ or a metaphor.

In contrast, those in the threading business know full well what they are doing. They are manipulators who slyly thread their hot topic/hot button issue even into ideas, images, sounds, themes, and things that have little or nothing to do with them. Thus, they like to thread the theme of ‘diversity’ into everything positive, duping people into believing that everything positive and wonderful is due mainly to ‘diversity’. This can get silly sometimes, as when some sports commentators say Americans are so good at basketball because of the ‘diversity’. Yeah, I guess there is Jeremy Lin, though, to be sure, given the surreal nature of PC, an all black team could be said to be ‘diverse’ while a team that is majority white is said to be ‘too white’.