We know there were Muslims 'crazy' enough to do 9/11. Were there Jews 'crazy' enough as well?
What really happened on 9/11? The internet space has been abuzz with Tucker Carlson’s reassessment of what might be deemed the foundational event of the 21st century. Speculations about 9/11 have matched or even surpassed those about the John F. Kenney assassination, and one may argue as to which one was more consequential. Whereas only one person was killed in the 1963 event(though two if we include the assassination of Oswald and many more if we include the alleged killings of witnesses and investigators), it altered the nature of leadership at the core of the US government, with Lyndon B. Johnson taking over the helm with a more pro-Israel policy and pro-war(in Vietnam) agenda.
In contrast, whereas many more died in the 9/11 tragedy, they were ordinary folks(or ‘nobodies’)while the core of national governance remained intact and was, furthermore, emboldened to pursue its pre-established agenda concerning the Middle East. In this sense, the JFK assassination might have had a more profound impact in fundamentally altering the trajectory of US foreign policy, whereas 9/11 mainly provided wind behind the back of administration insiders already hellbent on a ‘transformative’ US foreign policy.
According to the official narrative, the event has been broadly described thus: The US, in its support of ‘freedom fighters’ in Afghanistan and attempts to maintain stability in the Middle East, especially in the aftermath of the Gulf War that left Iraq in tatters, unwittingly created conditions for a blowback. As things turned out, the so-called ‘freedom fighters’ were religious zealots who were as hostile to the liberal democratic West as to the Soviet Union. So, once the Soviets were gone, their guns were turned on Western powers. Also, the US military presence in Saudi Arabia(as a check on potentially resurgent regime of Saddam Hussein) enraged Muslim fundamentalists like Osama Bin Laden who just about had enough and, along with likeminded Muslim fanatics around the world, hatched a grand plan to teach Babylon America the mother of all lessons.
Furthermore, Osama Bin Laden and his ilk were emboldened by Bill Clinton’s indecisions regarding Islamic terrorism. Apparently, Clinton employed the US military to maintain order in the region but minus the iron resolve to destroy the root causes of the troubles. He chose not to oust Hussein and install a new regime, nor did he wage total war on the terrorists. Given such half-measures on the part of the Lone Superpower, the Muslim fanatics carried out a series of terrorist attacks on US military targets and embassies in Africa. Neocon critics argued that Clinton should have known better since there was an attack on the World Trade Center in the first year of his administration in 1993. Perhaps, the Waco fiasco and the Oklahoma bombing directed excessive attention on domestic violence than foreign-bred terrorism.
Going back further, one might argue that the fatal mistake was the Gulf War, especially as it ended in unfinished business. Ultimately, the US allowed Hussein’s Sunni regime to remain in power as a check on Shia Iran, but that meant a fearful Kuwait(and supposedly Saudi Arabia as well). As such, there was a need for US military presence in the Middle East, which however inflamed many Muslims who regarded the American Military as infidel occupiers.
The Muslim fanatics or Jihadis were, furthermore, in high spirits in light of their victory over the Soviet Union in Afghanistan and full of fighting spirit(rather like Japanese militarists following the ‘victory’ over Russia in 1905). And despite being outraged by US sanctions that caused great harm to the Iraqis, a much weakened secular Hussein(who’d been no friend to the Jihadis) was to their advantage.
As for the Saudi government and other monarchies in the region, their continued funding of the fanatical, puritanical, or radical Muslim elements made sense as a continuation of policy from the beginning. Having been installed by the West as puppets & pawns, they sought legitimacy as custodians of True Islam. Ironically, the more they whored out to the secular ‘decadent’ West, the more they felt a need to burnish their image as devout heirs of the Prophet. The more money they made by dealing with the US, Europe, and Israel, the more money they funneled to purist religious elements(though it wasn’t long before the purists would go ‘punk’ with a nihilistic edge). The Saudis simultaneously hosting the ‘heathen’ US military and pumping money to Jihadi elements was surely too big a contradiction. The Saudi elites, hardly the brightest bulbs in town, probably failed to see where it may all lead.
The official narrative on 9/11 is true enough to the extent that there were plenty of angry Muslims filled with both rage and confidence. In their eyes, it wasn’t so much the US that defeated the Soviet Union but the Jihadi warriors in Afghanistan with the blessing of Allah. After all, the Americans never directly engaged the Soviets whereas the Muslims fought the Soviets on the ground and forced their retreat from Afghanistan. If Muslims could defeat one empire, then why not another? Maybe the US was a paper tiger, just like the USSR, which was soon swept into the dustbin of history.
True, the US demonstrated awesome might against Iraq in the Gulf War, but Hussein wasn’t a favored of Allah but a secular tyrant who engaged in a conventional war than a holy war. Besides, the end of the Soviet Union meant that secular Arab governments could no longer look to the godless communist empire for support. The hope was that the theocrats would take over, like in Iran(though despised by Sunnis for its Shia dominance). Another advantage for the Muslims was the transformation of the West into open societies, thereby allowing increasing numbers of Arabs and/or Muslims to enter and set up global networks, which, if anything, had been aided and abetted by the CIA and MI6 during the Afghanistan War and other Muslim-centered aggressions on the USSR, which would continue post-Cold War with the West’s backing of Muslim elements in Bosnia, Albania, and Chechnya. Thus, the Muslims could mount an attack on the West not only from the Middle East, a rather difficult task, but from within the West itself.
But, what is meant by ‘Muslims’? Surely, most of the Muslim world wanted nothing to do with something like 9/11, even if they held anti-American, anti-Western, and/or anti-Zionist sentiments. And no Arab and/or Muslim government, however angry at the US or the West, wanted a war with the Lone Superpower.
The Muslims in question were the hotheads, the true believers, the zealots, the fanatics, the lunatics, the crazies. They were of two kinds: Those who were devoutly religious and spent their entire lives in the Muslim world and those who lived in the West & had grown neurotic and confused in their identities and loyalties, seeking to resolve these contradictions by committing to Jihadism, somewhat like Yukio Mishima who was seduced by so many things Western, which led to shame and confusion that finally culminated in his fanatical act. It’s understandable why people hate what they hate, but it’s more complicated when they hate what they love. Many ‘brown’ Muslims found better lives in the West and preferred living among whites, Christians, atheists, and infidels than among their own kind, but this attraction to the West also led to self-loathing. (It’s like how some of the most radical blacks tend to be middle class types who reside in a mostly white community, i.e. though they prefer the white community over the ‘ghetto’, they feel compromised and seek ‘authenticity’, like the Colin Kaepernick character.)
Only such Muslims were ‘crazy’ enough to attempt something like 9/11, an act far crazier than Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor or Germany’s Operation Barbarossa. It’s common knowledge that most of the terrorists were of Saudi origin, especially Osama Bin Laden himself of course; the series of events that culminated in the attack could be sourced to funding from well-placed Saudi politicians and businessmen. But, it’s highly unlikely they knew what was up and most probably regarded the funding as customary, i.e. the powerful and privileged in Saudi Arabia maintained their legitimacy via generous funding of Muslim Fundamentalists.
But somewhere along the line, Islamic puritanism split between the institutional and the inspirational. The institutional Muslims were like ultra-conservative Catholics or Orthodox Christians, committed to hierarchy, tradition, and dogma. The inspirational Muslims were like a firebrand sect of Protestants who felt that established Muslim authorities, for all their invocations of faith and piety, were servile to the cynical monarchies that, behind the curtain, did the bidding of the US and Zion. They were like Che Guevara who broke off from Castroite Cuba that focused on survival and stability than stoking revolutionary flames in Latin America(and the Third World). Guevara, emboldened by the Cuban Revolution against the Big Bad Yanqui Empire, believed he could lead all of Latin America in a Marxist revolution against the US and Capitalist West.
If the Sixties were a heady period for leftist radicals around the world, the nineties were a similar period for Muslim radicals who prophesied a great new conflict brewing between Islam and the satanic West. Muslim warriors proved they could defeat a secular empire in Afghanistan. And secular regimes in the Middle East turned out to be corrupt and ineffective. Iraq, supposedly the premier secular Arab power in the region, was clobbered overnight by the US. As for countries like Jordan and Egypt, they’d become client beggar-states dependent on US aid. As for the religious states, there was Iran that stood firm, but it was Shia, therefore the enemy — besides the fact that a Shia power stood firmest against the US empire was rather embarrassing to Sunni fundamentalists — , and there was Saudi Arabia that, in hosting US military presence, showed its true colors as a traitor and coward.
Therefore, the time was ripe for a Sunni Islamic Revolution, and the way to go about it was to strike at the heart of the beast, which was New York and Washington D.C., thereby instigating the mother of all holy wars.
The plotters were limited in the power of foresight. They devised a deceptively complicated plot that was actually quite simple in its essentials: Teach some radicals how to fly, hijack some planes, and fly them into symbols of American Power, such as Wall Street and the Pentagon. That was about it. No easy feat, to be sure, given the obstacles of security, but then, this was the pre-War-on-Terror era when airports in the West were far more lax in their inspections.
Now, what about the aftermath of the momentous event? The Muslims just left it up to Allah. Just light the fire and let Allah decide. Unlike the German invasion of Russia and the Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor that were accompanied with some degree of what-then and what-if forethought, it appears the Muslims believed or hoped that Allah would somehow intervene and steer events to favor the True Believers against the satanic godless West. For sure, they thought they weren’t being watched. They were going to dupe the infidels all the way to the winning touchdown. It was going to be a perfect score.
The Muslim involvement in the event as presented by the official 9/11 narrative seems more or less true. Those who say the whole thing was an ‘inside job’ and that Muslims had a minimal or nonexistent role in the event come across as fantastic, delirious, or disingenuous(if only to push the most nonsensical narrative to discredit the ‘truther’ movement).
Muslim radicals surely flattered themselves as ever so clever in going under the radar. Apparently, no one in the West detected their plans and movements. Yet, apart from the sheer scale of the event involving jumbo jets slamming into gigantic buildings, the plan was rather crude and simpleminded. The basic dynamic didn’t amount to much more than an irate prole stealing a rich man’s limo and slamming it into his mansion. Hijack several planes in a deer-in-the-headlights manner and fly them into skyscrapers and the Pentagon before the US authorities figure out what’s what. Though much smaller in scale, the Israeli pager attack on Lebanon was far more complicated. The same was true of the sneak attack on Iran as much of it came from within the latter from multiple fronts and in multiple forms. In contrast, the Al Qaeda plan amounted to little more than (1) training some radicals to fly airplanes and (2) hitting some buildings, apparently doable as long as the US had its guard down.
Indeed, the war that soon ensued proved to be anticlimactic. 9/11 was a one-off stunt, made possible only by the element of surprise. Japan proved to be no match for the US in the Pacific War but still had airplanes, ships, and submarines(before they were all destroyed). In contrast, the supposedly fearsome Jihadis had little more than AK-47’s. Instead of a global War on Terror, or World War III, it was a turkey shoot for the US military, made even easier with the support of the so-called ‘Northern Alliance’, Afghani drug-runners eager to remove the Taliban who’d banned the drug trade.
Prior to the US invasion of Afghanistan, the news was full of reports of tough Jihadi warriors in Pakistan and elsewhere going to Afghanistan to join in the holy war. Once the bombing campaign began, however, the Jihadis were like frightened children peeing their pants and surrendering en masse. Some have even surmised that Osama Bin Laden was near capture but allowed to escape to prolong the War on Terror. The demise of the evil mastermind might have satiated the rage of most Americans. For all the continued alarmism, the two biggest War on Terror incidents in the US following the Afghan Invasion involved the ‘underwear bomber’ and the ‘shoe bomber’. Threats to be sure but hardly the kind to shake the world to its foundations. In essence, the War on Terror was a hype, just like the later mass scares about KKKops mowing down innocent blacks in the US, which led to the BLM War on White Police Terror, and about Covid-19 as a global emergency, which led to Big Pharma War on Bio-Terror.
Indeed, US intelligence authorities in the aftermath of 9/11 ascribed America’s vulnerability to the failure of the imagination. Who would have thought that a bunch of ragtag ‘ragheads’ would concoct such a plot and carry it out in broad daylight? The explanation hinged on no US official in his or her wildest imagination conceiving that such an attack was even possible. And most Americans(and people around the world), aghast at the unprecedented event, nodded along. True, crazy things have happened in history but nothing that crazy. Muslim headquartered in caves in godforsaken Afghanistan striking at the heart of the US empire? It’d be like Mongols on horseback attacking Moscow or Warsaw in the modern era. 9/11 seemed like the mother of all Black Swan events.
Yet, later revelations suggested otherwise. Certainly, there was a failure of imagination among many in US intelligence, but the main failure wasn’t in regards to the ‘crazy’ Muslims but to the ‘crazier’ Jews. According to the official narrative, everyone was blindsided, but testimonies by many intelligence officials indicate that more than a few sensed something was up.
Now, some argue that intelligence agencies are so inundated with tips, alerts, warnings, and data that it’s easy not to notice the needle in the haystack. True, but what if it was more like a nugget of gold in the pan? While most data collected by intelligence services are clearly dismissible as false alarms or prank calls, others are too promising to ignore. It turns out the agencies had solid gold when it came to the 9/11 terrorists. They were well aware of foreign-born Muslims in the US learning the rudimentary skills to fly airplanes. Such signs were surely more than mere ‘data’, especially given the association between Muslims and Terrorism — after all, how many resources did the CIA, NSA, and FBI expend on possible Buddhist or Rastafarian terrorist attacks?
Furthermore, later reports showed that the intelligence services were very much on the trail of these terrorists across the Middle East, Europe, and the US, and it wouldn’t have taken a genius to connect the dots. As for Israeli intelligence services, they were tracking the day-to-day movements of the terrorists and either withheld them from US intelligence agencies or shared the information with only those within the agencies who were in on the plot, or Jewish Plot surrounding the Muslim Plot, like the Chinese game of Go where white pieces and black pieces seek to surround one another.
Very likely, the Muslims who thought they were being so clever and ingenious in their plotting were being watched all along by a smarter set of actors… like the Martians were watching the Earthlings in H.G. Wells’ THE WAR OF THE WORLDS:
“No one would have believed, in the last years of the nineteenth century, that this world was being watched keenly and closely by intelligences greater than man’s and yet as mortal as his own; that as men busied themselves about their various concerns they were scrutinized and studied, perhaps almost as narrowly as a man with a microscope might scrutinize the transient creatures that swarm and multiply in a drop of water.”
What to the Muslim radicals was a triumph was likely a trap set by the Jews. Then, the real failure of the imagination surrounding 9/11 was in the underestimation of or the taboos surrounding what the ‘crazier’ elements of Jewish Power were capable of.
Granted, such a failure in regards to Jews isn’t merely conceptual but emotional, i.e. everyone is terrified of being accused of ‘antisemitism’. It’s about having cold feet after several generations of indoctrination about the Holocaust and ‘antisemitism’ as the greatest sin of all time. So, while many in the intelligence agencies didn’t dare to think that Muslims could be that crazy, virtually no one dared to even harbor such suspicions of the Jews.
But enough personnel in US intelligence did notice something was happening, and the question is why their leads were buried, obstructed, or diverted instead of connected to provide a picture of an imminent attack. Almost certainly, the Jews involved in the plot-within-the-plot(or more like the plot-around-the-plot) didn’t suffer for a lack of imagination in terms of what their enemies and they themselves were capable of. Having long operated within the Middle East, they knew the nature of radical Islam, especially given Jews had a role in planting ‘crazy’ ideas in Muslim minds. There’s been evidence of Jews posing as Muslims to spread the most fanatical ideas among Jihadi elements with the dual purpose of (1) making the West see Arabs/Muslims as terrorist threats, thus enemies not only to Israel but to the Christian/Secular West and (2) directing Jihadi violence at modernizing and/or secular Arab/Muslim countries that regard Muslim radicals as dangerous and destabilizing, e.g. neither Saddam Hussein’s Iraq, Gaddafi’s Libya, nor the Islamic Republic of Iran tolerated Muslims gone ‘punk’.
Of course, the Islamic radicals could sometimes blow up in Zionist faces, like the Muslim Brotherhood organization Hamas that Israel initially supported to weaken the secular PLO(now Fatah). Of course, now that Hamas represents the vanguard of Palestinian resistance, Israel backs the secular Fatah. Indeed, it’s telling that the West, despite constant complaints about theocratic leanings in the Middle East, has tended to support Saudi Arabia and the Emirates with the longest record of funding and supporting Jihadi elements while doing everything to weaken and destabilize modern/secular countries like Hussein’s Iraq, Gaddafi’s Libya, and Assad’s Syria. But then, the West is fervently anti-Iranian. In the end, it’s not about religion or secularism but who submits to the Jewish-controlled West. Thus, both secular Egypt(or Jordan) and religious Saudi Arabia are acceptable in Western eyes. There, the Arab elites are similar to the white brownnoser elites in the West. White cucks to Jews want all the world to cuck to the Jews as well.
Jews masquerading as Muslims was no different from Jews masquerading as ‘white supremacist’ Neo-Nazis in the US to stoke fear and paranoia across the nation, thereby generating more sympathy for the Jewish community. Frank Collin the Neo-Nazi leader turned out to be Jewish.
And surely, some Jews ‘converted’ to Christianity to change the religion from within, guiding the church toward GloboHomo and Zion-Worship. Granted, Jews hardly need to pose as new converts to manipulate idiot white Christians into taking up the banner of ‘Judeo-Christian’ America, e.g. Ted Cruz and countless others like him proselytizing that the #1 mission of the Church is to praise and appease the Jews. As there’s nothing like Judeo-Islam(at least as yet, though one wonders about the ultimate objective of the Abraham Accords — notice it’s not called Muhammad Manual) and as Muslims aren’t burdened with Holocaust Guilt(and besides, Islam lacks the guilt complex at the core of Christianity), it would be more difficult for Jews to manipulate the Muslims, which explains the practice of Jews masquerading as Muslims and infiltrating Muslim groups.
Among all the ethnicities and nationalities in the world, only two groups could have been responsible for 9/11. The radical Muslims obviously, as they were hateful, crazy, and righteous enough to be motivated. But, the Jews too as they had most to benefit from the horror. Indeed, 9/11 for the Jews was like the mother of all jackpots. The perversely strange dance between radical Muslims and Zionist Jews has been one of the weirdest partnerships in recent history, even more surreal than the so-called Judeo-Christian alliance in the West. But then, there’s also the Judeo-Nazi alliance in Ukraine. And, recall how World Jewry simultaneously allied with blacks against white ‘racists’ and became partners-in-crime with Apartheid South Africa against the pro-Palestinian ANC.
There was also the Italo-Jewish partnership in organized crime, with Jews as the brains and Italians as the muscle. Even though the Jewish role in organized crime equaled or even surpassed that of the Italians, the latter got most of the blame. Likewise, even though radical Muslims couldn’t have done much without Jewish-Western backing, they alone became the face of terrorism.
9/11 was likely the result of the symbiotic interaction between hot crazy Muslims and cold crazy Jews. Of course, cold-craziness is far more dangerous than hot-craziness for the same reason that cold and cunning Michael Corleone proved to be far more formidable than hot and raging Sonny Corleone(who was led by the nose and gunned down).
It’s the difference between a sociopath and a psychopath. A psychopath may be just as crazy and demented as a sociopath but is far more adept at hiding his feelings and passing off as a normal and law-abiding member of society. Radical Muslims were like Tommy(Joe Pesci) in GOODFELLAS, whereas the Zionist Jews were like Paulie(Paul Sorvino) or Jimmy(Robert DeNiro). Just like Italians got most of the blame for organized crime, the Muslims got most of the blame for terrorism despite being played and manipulated by the smarter Jews with far more control and resources at the global level.
After 9/11 happened, many Americans wondered if there was an Iranian, Iraqi, Libyan, or Palestinian connection, especially as the Western Media usually connected those countries with terrorism. But when investigations pointed the finger at Saudi Arabia, the closest Arab ally of the US, the findings were suppressed, ignored, or rationalized. Michael Moore, to his credit, made a big fuss about the connections between the Bush family and the Saudis in his film FAHRENHEIT 9/11— and politicians like Trump would later revive the issue — , but the fatso wasn’t willing to connect those dots to the Zionist ones, which might have brought him closer to the truth.
How was it that the Arab state that left the most fingerprints on 9/11 was forgotten and/or forgiven by the US government that instead went after Iraq and others, mostly secular and modern? As Kevin Barrett surmised, the Zionist-led West had either approved or tolerated Saudi funding of Jihadis with the anticipation that the Saudis would be blackmailed into compliance after 9/11. Saudi funders of the Jihadis were most certainly in the dark about how their money and support would be used and where it would lead.
After all, the Saudi family had always looked to the US for protection from both Israel and more sovereign Arab countries. As the majority of 9/11 terrorists were Saudi, the Saudi government had no choice but to prove its innocence(or redeem itself) with total commitment to America’s War on Terror, and in turn, the US would defend the Saudi government as having been hoodwinked by rogue elements, somewhat similar to the post-Pacific War narrative concerning Japan that spun Emperor Hirohito as essentially a decent and innocent man who’d been misled and exploited by reckless militarists but strove for peace and amity between Japan and the US in the postwar environment.
As such, the Saudis were made doubly servile to the US lest the latter change its mind and charge it for the crimes of 9/11. Power is magical, and the US as the Lone Superpower had the wherewithal to whitewash the suspicious Saudis while accusing innocent Iraq of fantastic WMD programs that never existed.
Likewise today, Venezuela, a minor player in the drug trade, has been made the big kahuna of narco-trafficking even as the US is partnered with major narco-trafficking countries(and was the patron of opium growers in Afghanistan). Or consider the magic of making Iran, which never had nukes, into a nuclear rogue state threatening the world while Israel, which has hundreds of nukes aimed at Iran(and who-knows-what-other-countries), is presented as the voice of reason. Or, the media magic of insisting that Israel, which is committing genocide in Gaza, is ‘defending’ itself. What was the response from virtually every EU government in the immediate aftermath of Israel’s perfidious sneak attack on Iran? “Israel has the right to defend itself.” It can’t get any more psychopathic than this.
To better understand 9/11, it’s worth considering the transformation of the US in the decade prior. As devious as the Reagan administration and the George H.W. Bush administration could be, something like 9/11 would have been far more difficult to hatch and carry out under their watch. And despite the long history of Israeli acts of deception, terrorism, and the like, it’s unlikely that the kind of Jews who ruled Israel until 1990 would have cooked up something as outlandish as 9/11. If Israel had a role in the assassination of John F. Kennedy, it could be held up as evidence of Zionist craziness, but assassinating a political leader is far more discreet than epic attacks on the main metropolis and the political capital of the Lone Superpower, especially if factions in the US Deep State also wanted him gone.
To be sure, the very epic nature of the tragedy served as a most effective cover, i.e. most people, utterly dumbfounded and mentally paralyzed, were likely to welcome the simple narrative of crazy Muslims who hated the West for its freedoms. Of course, the beauty of the plot was that Jews had plausible deniability as the act itself would be carried out by radical Muslims(who’d fallen into the Zionist trap). If you know Bob wants to kill Bill and if you clear the path between them, Bob will get all the blame if you remain in the shadows. With 9/11, Jews didn’t have to do it. They merely had to let it happen. It’s like the US didn’t have to kill Ngo Dinh Diem of South Vietnam. Just withdraw the protection, and anti-Diem forces would do the job. Jews merely needed to facilitate or lubricate the path between the radical Muslims and their objective. Have them purchase plane tickets and get onboard. Then, the hijackings and eventual collisions would take place.
But then, what kind of Jews would do such a thing? It wasn’t only monstrous but bold, bolder than Albert Brooks’ neo-hippie venture in LOST IN AMERICA. Perhaps, it had something to do with the boomer generation, and boomer Jews were bolder than earlier generations. After all, they grew up with Rock n Roll, pornography, sexual licentiousness, and the culture of shamelessness. It was the generation that produced Erica Jong of FEAR OF FLYING.
There was also the heady mix of power/privilege and self-pitying victimology stemming from Holocaustology. Some boomer Jews excoriated older Jews for their timidity in not making a bigger fuss about the Holocaust. They had more opportunities than earlier generations of Jews but also unprecedented moral cover as the spiritual children of the Holocaust to whom so much was owed by white society on account of the long history of ‘antisemitism’.
This was also a time when the WASP establishment was in rapid decline. Take the likes of Jordan Belfort, brasher and crazier than earlier generations of Jews who, for all their wiliness, had grown up with reminders not to rock the boat too much. Boomer Jews waged a kind of Ron-Jeremiad against the West. Like the notorious Jewish porn performer Ron Jeremy, they had the chutzpah to suck their own cocks and goad white goyim to bend over and take it up the arse. Jewish antics in Weimar Germany led to serious backlash, but in the post-WWII atmosphere where ‘antisemitism’ became increasingly not only verboten but blasphemous, Jews felt more and more emboldened to act out their ‘radical’ wills, culminating even in the sacro-sodomization of the West, aka GloboHomo or LimpWristianity as the de facto substitute for Christianity.
Thus, even if earlier generations of Jews had their crazier moments, they were more anxious about negative consequences and hamstrung by a society that was still overwhelmingly Anglo-American-and-Christian dominant. But boomer Jews were under no such restraints. They could feel it in the air that they could be as brash as Sarah Silverman and Howard Stern, stick their middle fingers at everything and insert various objects into the bodily orifices of white goyim without much pushback; indeed, white goyim were compelled to say they enjoyed every abuse meted out by Jews. It’s like Bibi Netanyahu routinely rams Donald Trump in the arse, figuratively of course, but Trump and MAGA just keep smiling like it’s the most normal thing to be ass-bitched by the Jewish cock.
If boomer Jews arguably had the biggest balls in Jewish History, boomer whites surely had the tiniest gonads, at least in regards to the Jews. Consider. Even though sensitivity about Jewish Power had been a fixture of 20th century America, Richard Nixon did bluntly opine about Jewish influence with other prominent figures(who tended to agree with him), as attested by the Nixon tapes. Jimmy Carter sought some justice for the Palestinians and, as ex-president, harshly criticized Israel’s apartheid-like policies in the Occupied Territories. After the bombing in Lebanon, Reagan said NO to deeper involvement as demanded by the Zionists. James Baker, the right-hand man of George H.W. Bush, remarked that American Jews, who don’t vote for the GOP anyway, can go to hell. So, among the so-called Greatest Generation types, there was some degree of ‘cockblocking’ against the Portnoic Will.
But, what about goy boomer politicians? It’s been an endless parade of who sucks Zionist dong more and takes it up the arse from Israel the most. Whether George W. Bush or Hillary Clinton, it’s been, “I’m a bigger whore to Zion.”
Of course, given the overwhelming Democratic affiliation of Jews, the Right’s cucking to Zion has been more embarrassing. At least goy Democrats were favored by the Jewish community and, as such, their whore behavior was well rewarded. In contrast, given that Jewish Power has done so much to subvert, discredit, and defame white interests, Christian values, and conservative mores, it’s been a humiliation ritual for the Republicans, supposed defenders of American Conservatism, to posture as staunch defenders of beleaguered Jews supposedly ill-served by the Democratic Party(ROTFL), apparently because Clinton or Obama delivered on only 99% of Jewish demands.
American Conservatism, in its boundless servility to Jews, has even embraced ‘gay marriage’ as a ‘conservative value’ and only managed to hide its tail between the legs when Jewish Power unleashed BLM & Antifa pogroms to desecrate white monuments in the South. The likes of Lindsey Graham are your typical goy ‘conservative’ boomers. Total silence on the iconoclasm of the Robert E. Statue but endless appeasement of Jewish agendas in Ukraine and Gaza.
In 2016, Donald Trump bestrode the political stage as the goy politician to finally break from the mold, only to emerge as just another cuck-maggot with Netanyahu’s dong deep up his bung.
Even many elements of the so-called Dissident Right are into cuckery. Take HBD, which might as well be called ‘Hebrew-Bio-Domination’ than Human-Bio-Diversity, as its main position is that Jews are indeed the superior master race on account of having won the most Nobel Prizes, and therefore, whites must cuck to awesome Jews who are merely doing to the Palestinians what the Cowboys did to the Indians. Tiny gonad goy boomers have done incalculable damage to the US and the West in their utmost cuckery to Jewish Power in human history.
In the German film THE BAADER MEINHOF COMPLEX, we observe how leftist radicalism goes from idealism to extremism to nihilism. If the earlier radicals, however misguided, were still driven by ideals of justice, the movement increasingly turned into a fanaticism of violent action, finally degenerating into a nihilism of destruction. It went ‘punk’. Radical Muslims seem to have gone through a similar arc, leading eventually to the utterly insane ISIS factions.
Same goes for the Jewish supremacists, especially among the ethno-supremacist Neocons, genocidal Likudniks, Neo-Weimarians, and the Wokemons. US Neocons and Israeli Likudniks have worked hand-in-glove, whereas Neo-Weimarians and Wokemons haven’t always aligned with the interests of Zionist hegemony.
Yet, the Neo-Weimarians have been useful to Jewish supremacism by spreading decadence and degeneracy across the West, acclimatizing the white race to deracination, dissipation, interracist jungle fever, pornification of culture, tattoos & piercings, drug use, and sex-and-city mentality. And, the Jewish Wokemons have been useful in deconstructing white identity, discrediting Christianity, subverting natural norms, sacralizing Negrolatry, consecrating GloboHomo, idealizing Diversity, and increasing doses on ‘white guilt’, creating the Millennial generation that believes homosexuality is next to godliness and is allergic to the slightest expression of white positivity.
Thus, whiteness lost all functionality as a rival to Jewish Power. If whites on the ‘left’ took moral pride in their racial self-abnegation — “I hate my race, therefore I am good” — , whites on the ‘right’, who still craved a sense of identity and rootedness, outsourced this need to the Jews whose identity, history, and spirituality retained legitimacy. So, Southern Whites, robbed of their Neo-Confederate heritage, found vicarious pride of identity by rooting for Jewish racial identity and even its supremacist manifestations. People like Ted Cruz will tell you that white Americans must forever atone for racial discrimination against blacks but then beam with shill-pride as the biggest cuck-cheerleader of Judeo-Nazi Zionists who flaunt their identity, ultra-nationalism, and imperial ambitions.
Jewish Wokemons, wittingly or not, were a boon to the Neocons whose agenda entailed white goy submission to Jews. The cult of White Guilt assured that whites, no longer allowed to serve their own identity and interests, had to serve another group, one deemed holy. Suppress white energies and channel them toward serving something other. For white ‘liberals’, it was homos and blacks, the puppets and pawns of Jewish Power. For white ‘conservatives’, it was the Jews as superior and smarter whites unburdened with ‘white guilt’; Jews were idolized as the perfect whites as they represented both victory and victimhood. Unlike white goyim whose past victories were stained with the sin of ‘racism’, Jewish victories were deemed purely meritocratic and hard-won through adversity against the ‘Anti-Semites’. Also, Jewish victimization, on account of the Holocaust(and Biblical Narratives), was deemed the most tragic ever. Thus, Jews came to represent both ‘white’ victory and ‘white’ victimization(reserved mainly for Jews). Inconveniently for white goyim, much of this Jewish victim narrative is associated with the White Christian World, but post-war whites eagerly rebranded themselves as repentant and rehabilitated, the Good Whites who’ve seen the light and would go to any length to ‘bless’ the Jews.
Why do ‘crazy’ people take control of agendas? Because such types tend to be bolder, gutsier, more adventurous, tougher and stronger-willed. Men smarter, better educated, and more sophisticated than Hitler followed Der Fuhrer because he radiated the will-to-power. Zhou En-Lai and other Chinese leaders were as smart or smarter than Mao, but the Chairman was made of granite. In THE GODFATHER, Tom Hagen is as smart as Michael Corleone, but Michael has the nerves of steel and the balls of iron. In GOODFELLAS, Jimmy(Robert De Niro) prefers tough Tommy(Joe Pesci) over malleable Henry(Ray Liotta). Steve Jobs wasn’t even a tech-wizard and had a reputation for being an ‘asshole’, but he exuded boundless confidence and knew how to take charge and impose his will. Such types don’t always take control but have the advantage in crisis situations in which normal rules don’t apply.
Jews tend to be in crisis mode, even in times of peace and prosperity. The history of Israel surely hasn’t been easy. The history of communism, fascism & National Socialism, and World War II affected Jews in profound ways, leading to both great power and great tragedy. Jews in the US found relative peace and lots of prosperity, but the Jewish political psychology of victimhood narratives, fears of eternal ‘antisemitism’, anguish over the Holocaust, and worries about Jews in Israel created a culture of constant crisis, with organizations like ADL and $PLC always sounding the alarm bells about neo-Cossacks over the horizon(or Neo-Nazi militias in a corner of Montana who somehow saved Hitler’s brains). The extreme Jewish reaction to Donald Trump, long a reliable tool of New York Jewish moguls, betrayed the level of neurosis in the Chosenite community. He was said to be ‘literally worse than Hitler’, and Jewish powers-that-be even unleashed BLM pogroms and Antifa mobs against White America to unseat him in 2020. And the Covid hysteria was inconceivable without Jewish control and complicity all across medical institutions, media, academia, local governments, and etc.
Then, it’s hardly surprising that the ‘crazier’ Jews took command of the Zionic agenda in the post-Cold-War era. And if older Jews had been hamstrung by White Christian America and/or expended a good deal of energy on the questions of the Cold War, the ascendant boomer Jews in the 1990s knew that White America had lost its moral authority, spiritual compass, and racial prestige. The white race had become a bitch to the Jews.
Also, with the Soviet Union gone and with the US as the lone superpower, Jews could solely focus on their greatest ambition: Global domination via US and NATO as hegemon. With no other superpower, such as the former Soviet Union as a potential backer of the Arab/Muslim regimes, Jews could settle all accounts once and for all, fulfilling the radical and totalistic Clean Break Strategy of no compromise and no middle-ground, just total demolition and absolute domination. It seemed a golden opportunity in the 1990s when Russia was down and out, led by the drunken boor Boris Yeltsin. Indeed, not only was Russia politically finished as the other superpower, it became a whorehouse for the Jews, or gangster paradise for Zionic oligarchs. Ironically, the utter lack of legality in Russia made Jewish domination less tenable in the long run as counterforces could also play gangster to push back. It’s what Putin’s gang did.
At any rate, it was the US that was key to Jewish World Hegemony, and it’s worth considering what transpired in the US during the Clinton years, the first era of the Boomer takeover. In a way, Bill Clinton was the opposite of Boris Yeltsin the boor. Clinton was regarded as highly intelligent and energetic, savvy and resourceful. While Yeltsin didn’t know what day it was, Clinton knew every minute of the day as he was working with key figures both domestic and foreign to complete the New World Order.
Yet, in a way, Clinton was an American Yeltsin in that he too facilitated the transfer of imperial power and largesse to the Jews. Besides, though not a drunken bum, he too had vices that undid him, usually concerning women. It betrayed the reckless and destructive side of his character, and it surely provided a lot of blackmail material to the Jews. His actions were often impulsive and contradictory, leading to Clinton fatigue after eight long years. It all crashed and burned with the dot.com bubble and Monica Lewinsky sex scandal, biggest circus of the decade after the O.J. Simpson clown show of a trial.
Clinton the smart lawyer-president may have been fully awake unlike the sloshed Yeltsin, but he’d pretty much handed the US to the Jews on a silver platter. He did it by deregulating Wall Street, a key source of Jewish wealth and power. Also by allowing media conglomeration. And by weakening Big Labor by working with the GOP on ‘free trade’. As Jewish Power was centered in finance, big business, and global networks, any weakening of Big Labor(traditionally a stronghold among the Democrats) meant more profits and power to the Jews.
In a way, the Democratic dumping of Big Labor had as big if not bigger impact than the dumping of Dixiecrats in the Sixties and Seventies. For quite awhile, the Democratic Party became the libertarian ideal of economic ‘conservatism’ and social ‘liberalism’, at least until the politics of tolerance turned into one of mandatory quasi-theocratic reverence for certain themes, usually related to homos, Negroes, and Jews.
The transformation of US politics in the Clinton era between the presidencies of George H.W. Bush to George W. Bush was truly profound. If father Bush was about giving Jews 50% and demanding 50% in return, the sonny boy Bush was about giving Jews 100% and then borrowing to give 100% more.
Yeltsin was a fool and used as a pawn, but in the long run he did more for Russia than Clinton did for America. At the very least, Yeltsin took on the Jihadis in Chechnya activated by the CIA and installed Putin as his successor, two decisions that set Russia on the course of national recovery. Clinton, on the other hand, though seemingly on top of things during his presidency, found he had no choice but to fully accede to Boomer Jews.
As Patrick Buchanan noted of William Kristol’s commentary, all the ‘Arabists’ had been purged across the political spectrum, and both political parties were competing on the basis of who can appease Zion more. And things got worse under Barack Obama whose aura as The One made the opposition to the Neocon/Neolib agenda disappear. Even as Jews used George W. Bush, they also caricaturized him as a Christian Fascist sliding the US toward a theocracy in partnership with bloodthirsty oilmen. As such, there were many protests and considerable pushback against his foreign policy from progressive elements. But the Negrolatry surrounding Obama as the first black president, the supposed fulfilment of the Boomer dream of JFK and MLK, neutralized potential progressive dissent against his foreign policy that turned out to be an even more brazen continuation of Jewish supremacism and Zionist imperialism.
Whether drunk on vodka or drooling after women, Yeltsin and Clinton found out their options were limited within the tightening vice of Jewish Power. Much of the 20th century, especially following World War II, had been defined by the titanic struggle between capitalist US and communist Russia. In both domains, Jews had played influential roles of varying degrees(ever more prominent in the US while less so in the USSR) but not exactly dominant ones; however, the 1990s changed all that. Under Clinton and Yeltsin, Jewish Power consolidated its dominant positions in both the US and post-Soviet Russia. Thus, even though America was regarded as the proud victor in the Cold War over pitiable Russia, both were defeated and conquered flunkies at the feet of Global Zion.
In a way, the overarching ambition of the US as the lone superpower in the post-Cold-War environment was less an expression of American Power than of its powerlessness in the face of Zion. The US actually had much to gain from the peace dividend and good relations with Russia and also as the leading exemplar of liberal democracy.
Instead, the US chose the role of the world’s policeman, judge, jury, and executioner in service to Jewish gangsterism. Clinton had little choice in this given the kind of donors that made him(and could break him). And even though George W. Bush was portrayed as a neo-Wilsonian figure attempting to remake the world in America’s image, the fool was really reading from the script prepared for him by the Neocons who flattered the dummy as the New Churchill(in the War on Terror) and champion of democracy. (American hypocrisy, once again, continued unabated. Woodrow Wilson, the promoter of democracy and national self-determination worldwide, was a Segregationist and a KKK sympathizer. And George W. Bush and the Republican Party, the supposed promoters of human rights and democratization in the Middle East, were loyal enablers of Jewish supremacy and Zionist imperialism.) Even Patrick Buchanan often opted for this bogus narrative, albeit in dissent — the Bush II regime failed due to its preening idealism and humanitarian hubris — because naming the Jewish Factor would have led to accusations of ‘antisemitism’, something that had brought him much grief over the years beginning with the Gulf War. In truth, there was no real idealism, and the foreign policy was premised on Jewish gangsterism.
In retrospect, everyone should admit that the War on Terror was the sham of the century. Not that there weren’t real Muslim terrorists as there were plenty around, but the main enablers, backers, and funders of such terrorists have been Arab allies of the US, especially Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and UAE. And the US itself through the CIA’s dirty war in Pakistan-Afghanistan where Jihadi elements were activated to wreak havoc against the USSR and Iran. The US also fueled Jihadi violence in Chechnya and northwest China. And Israel long employed radical Muslim elements against relatively stable Arab and/or Muslim countries that defied Zionist-US hegemony. Tragi-comically, the parties most responsible for having created the Frankenstein monster of Al Qaeda got to call the shots on whom to blame and destroy. Of course, they never looked in the mirror. It was like gangsters getting to decide what to do about violence stemming from organized crime.
The War on Terror was largely a strategy of redirection. It had less to do with destroying terrorist networks than forcing them to once again do the bidding of the West. If Israel and global Zionists pulled every trick in the book to direct radical Islamic fury at the US in 9/11, thus engaging the Lone Superpower in Wars-for-Israel, the subsequent objectives were to teach the Islamic terrorists a lesson and redirect their rage against targets chosen by Zion.
Apparently, the radical Muslims became overly confident to the point of recklessness in the aftermath of the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan(soon followed by the fall of the godless USSR itself) and as the result of America’s half-hearted responses to Muslim terrorist attacks on the US navy and embassies. Certain elements among the radical Muslims decided they could take on the US and watch it collapse like a house of cards like the USSR. These childish prodigal Muslims had to be punished, spanked real good, and then, they could be welcomed back into the fold as useful actors against countries like Libya and Syria(while never again messing with the US and especially Israel).
The end result of the War on Terror taught the radical Muslims that the US, Israel, and its allies are simply too powerful. The US military, along with the Coalition of the Willing(or Shilling), made it clear that it’s far more sensible for radical Muslims to direct their hostilities elsewhere, much like the Soviet demolition of Japanese forces in the Battle of Khalkhin Gol, aka Nomonhan Incident, served as a wakeup call for Japan to not mess with the rapidly industrialized and militarized Stalinist Russia. Japan got thrashed so badly that it redirected its imperialist energies away from Russia.
Likewise, whether the War on Terror was initially sincere in its objectives or not, its eventual achievement was to teach the terrorists not to mess with the US and instead go after other targets, indeed even with the backing of the US(and its allies, such as Israel, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and UAE). It effectively became a kind of non-aggression pact between the West and Islamic radicalism. The global Sunni extremists, burned badly by US might, redirected their energies against secular Arab states(like Libya and Syria) that tolerated heretical plurality of religions and Shia states like Iran. Given that Barack Obama’s campaign ran on his opposition to the Iraq War but then spent eight years in destabilizing the Middle East by aiding and abetting terrorist elements even more extreme than the Al Qaeda of 9/11, even those who’d believed that the War on Terror was well-intentioned even if ill-advised were disabused of the illusion.
Narratives are a function of power than a representation of reality. Given Western global media domination, the focus was on the dangers of Islamic radicalism/extremism(or what some called ‘Islamofascism’). Meanwhile, oft-repeated was the mantra that Israel is the ‘only (liberal) democracy in the Middle East’, an ‘outpost of Western values’, or a constant victim of terrorism at the hands of Jihadi elements, and therefore, their fight was deemed our fight. (Granted, there was also the rhetoric about Islam as the religion of peace, unfortunately hijacked by evil doers for nefarious purposes, but it was merely justification for the invasion of the Muslim world.)
In truth, however, the Arab violence against Israel was less religious than nationalist. Palestinians, the main resisters against Zionist hegemony, were motivated by territorial conflicts with the Jews. Hamas, though part of the Muslim Brotherhood, used violence for Palestinian nationhood, not some global Jihad against the infidels. Thus, virtually all the violence suffered by Israel was nationalist or geopolitical in nature, not religious. Had the Palestinians been mostly Christian, secular, or Buddhist, their struggle would have been much the same, much like the Irish against the British over Northern Ireland. As this violence was essentially over nationhood and territory, it was a local affair, hardly relevant to Western interests.
Therefore, in order to draw the West into the conflict, the Jewish-Palestinian conflict had to be spun as part of the ‘clash of civilizations’ that supposedly pitted the liberal and freedom-loving West against the entire Muslim World that had to be pressured into (1) practicing a peaceful kind of Islam (2) submitting to Western demands (3) radically transforming their countries from ‘medieval’ to liberal-democratic modes. Jews conflated their local national-political struggle with the Palestinians into something akin to a global struggle, or World War III(or World War IV according to Norman Podherotz). Given the sheer shock of 9/11, followed by several terrorist attacks in the Coalition-of-the-Willing partners, many Westerners swallowed the official narrative hook, line, and sinker, thus laying the emotional groundwork for the Iraq Invasion.
But none of this made much sense. Hussein’s Iraq(not to mention Gaddafi’s Libya and Assad’s Syria) was hardly a hotbed of Islamic extremism. If anything, the West had once recruited secular Iraq to fight a long bloody war against Iran as the Islamic Republic. Besides, the West had closest ties with Arab and/or Muslim countries that were most closely associated with funding Jihadi elements, and those countries were never targeted for invasion or destruction. And as the Obama, Trump, and Biden presidencies proved, the West reverted to funding and arming Jihadis to topple countries like Libya and Syria. Perhaps, Samuel Huntington was sincere in his ‘Clash of Civilizations’ thesis, but it was utter nonsense in reality. Without the support and influence of the Zionist-controlled West and its Arab allies(such as Saudi Arabia and Qatar), the Jihadi movement around the world wouldn’t have amounted to a plate of beans.
Furthermore, while Jihadism was overblown as a universal threat, usually overlooked was the rise of what might be called ‘Jewhadism’. If the first stage of Zionism had been focused on the establishment and survival of Israel and if the second stage on securing the unconditional backing of the West, the third stage was the expansion of the Greater Israel Project by expanding the boundaries of Israel and subjugating its neighbors, nearby and far flung, into client states. Israel would be the New Rome of the Middle East, much like National Socialist Germany at its peak in Continental Europe. The Abraham Accords weren’t about peace premised on mutual respect between Israel and the Arab states but on the submission of the Arabs to the Jews as the new Caesar-Pharaoh-Sultans.
Given the pettiness and cravenness of so many Arab elites, their secret wish has been for Jews to just finish the job and do away with the dream of Palestine. That way, they could work as compradors of the Jews(as masters) to accumulate more wealth and privileges, the only thing that most Arab ‘leaders’ care about. Rhetorically, they are with the Palestinians, but practically, their wish is for Jews to wipe out every last Palestinian man, woman, and child so that the PQ(Palestinian Question) won’t stand in the way of their self-serving bargaining with the Jews. The Arab elites are hardly different from the US and EU goy elites accustomed to playing second fiddle to the Jews-as-rightful-masters and feeding on second-servings after Jewish Power had its fill. It’s like wildlife where lions eat first while jackals and vultures hang around for leftovers.
The Palestinians are to the Arab elites what the working class was to the Democratic elites in the 1990s: An albatross around their necks. Democratic Party, given its historical association with Big Labor, felt obligated to represent the working class, but the outdated loyalty was costing the Democrats support from big money. So, even as Clintonites said one thing, they did something else. Likewise, Arab leaders make the usual noises about the Palestinians, but they want nothing more than the Palestinians to just disappear so that they can get their cut by working with Jews as the masters of the Middle East.
This wasn’t always the case as, for the longest time, the Zionists seemed mostly focused on self-preservation than expansion or regional hegemony. But the end of the Cold War, the collapse of the Soviet Union(as a potential backer of Arab states), the overwhelming US victory over Iraq, 9/11, the War-on-Terror, and then finally the War-with-Terror changed the calculus. Arab elites noticed that the Jews aren’t merely powerful but utterly dominant in the West, with white goy leaders serving as little more than cuck-puppets of Zion. Furthermore, the supremacist Jews are ruthlessly hellbent on using the West, especially the US as Lone Superpower, to crush and destroy any Arab and/or Muslim country even slightly defiant of Zion. Against such odds, why not just succumb to Jewish Power via the Abraham Accords that offer some rewards to would-be collaborators?
Overall, contrary to the Western narrative about Global Jihad and radical Muslim expansion, the truly radical and aggressive force in the Middle East(and elsewhere, such as Ukraine) was Jewhadic in nature.
Zionist supremacism, sold in the US as ‘Neoconservatism’, emerged as a brazen force in the 1990s for reasons geopolitical(the US as lone superpower), generational(Boomer Jews with fewer inhibitions than their elders), moralistic or quasi-spiritualist(Holy Holocaust Jews immune from criticism lest it be deemed ‘Anti-Semitic’), and psychological(Jewish arrogance bordering on hubris at the sight of white goyim reduced to hapless brownnosing cucks groveling at their feet). Also, regardless of whose fault, the failure of negotiations between Israel and the Palestinian authorities in the 1990s fueled the politics of rage on both sides, paving the way not only for the ascendancy of Hamas(which won the election before being ousted by Fatah with the backing of the US and Israel) but the lock on power in Israel by the far-right, represented by Likud and related parties, with the Labor Party headed for inevitable extinction. The crisis even led to the assassination of Yitzhak Rabin in 1995, often blamed on the inflammatory rhetoric from the Netanyahu faction.
The ‘Jewhadis’ had more in common with global Jihadis than with an outfit like Hamas that was mostly concerned with Palestinian issues. In contrast, the Israeli Right fixed its sight on a prize far bigger than the survival of Israel. They regarded Israel as the capital of Jewish World Hegemony. Unlike the Jihadis who relied on magical faith for guidance — “Hey fellas, Allah has our back” — , Jewish Power relied on math and carefully calculated the outcomes. Jews were masters of finance and game theory. Muslims believed that faith could move mountains, but Jewish math could move Western military assets to blow up entire countries. Muslims were outmatched by the Jews for the same reason that Christian Zionist dummies were and always will be. Whereas Jews use psychology to probe the goy mind and use their worldly assets in media, academia, law, and government to control politicians and bureaucracies, Christian dummies believe that if they pray long and hard enough and ‘bless the Jews’(or endorse whatever Israel does unconditionally), Jesus will somehow swoop down from Heaven and persuade the Jews to finally convert to Jesus Faith and dance merrily ever after with White Christians. When smarties fight with dummies, smarties win, as dumb Muslims found out. When smarties work with dummies, smarties lead while dummies follow, as the Christian dummies should know by now.
While there are surely thick-skulled Jewish religious zealots with magical thinking, the Jewish Power Game isn’t played by religious types groping in the dark but by secular ethno-supremacist gangsters with night-vision goggles. Mathematic Jews see what the Muslim numbnuts and Christian dingdongs fail to see. Jews surely know from the Leo Frank affair that they can spin a rapist-murderer into a saintly martyr. Control the narrative and iconography, and you can get away with just about everything. Recently, Jews use BLM to elevate George Floyd into a figure holier than god and jesus. Even though Jews played a prominent role in early Bolshevism that led to millions of deaths, notice how Jews managed to convince Ukrainians that Russians were entirely to blame for the Great Famine. Jews, who’d played a crucial role in the construction of Stalinist totalitarianism, later convinced the West that they were hapless victims of ‘Anti-Semitic’ communism. And even though World War II resulted partly from the clash of German ‘Aryan’ supremacism and Jewish ‘Semitic’ supremacism, the official narrative has the world believing that wholly innocent Jews were set upon by Germans gone nuts.
Then, it’s hardly surprising that the War on Terror narrative has directed our attention to the problems of Jihad while ignoring the Jewhad factor. If anything, the Jewhadis were far more dangerous for the simple reason that, whereas the Jihadis were always a fringe element in the Muslim world and wholly dependent on support from powerful actors(such as the US, Turkey, Israel, Saudis, etc.), the Jewhadis in the form of Likudniks and US Neocons gained supremacy in their respective domains. Jewhadis ousted the more moderate voices in Israel, so much so that today’s ‘left’ in Israel is almost as fanatical as the genocidal Likudniks when it comes to the Palestinian issue and Zionist imperialism.
In the US, the so-called Jewish Neo-Liberals in the Democratic Party merged almost seamlessly with the fanatical, murderous, bloodthirsty, and pathological Neocons, with the likes of Victoria Nuland proving the case by hopping back and forth between the two parties. Tony Blinken’s positions on issues pertaining to Ukraine and the Middle East were hardly distinguishable from those of Neocon Jews who served in George W. Bush’s administration.
The transformation of US foreign policy under Jewhadi control has been nothing less than breathtaking. Whatever one thinks of the Gulf War, at least the administration felt it had to bring the global community together to legitimize it. Clinton came under tremendous pressure from Jewish Power to finish off Iraq, but he felt he lacked sufficient justification to do so. And even though the Oslo Accords were doomed from the start, Clinton at least tried, which was for the last time any administration would intercede with a modicum of fairness. At least the case for the Iraq Invasion was made in the horrific aftermath of 9/11. The reasons were bogus, but the effects of trauma were all too real(and understandable).
In contrast, the war on Libya hardly invoked international approval or consensus. And in a heartbeat, the supposed War on Terror turned into War-with-Terror in Syria. Even after Obama officials admitted as much, there was barely any outrage in the Western Media, most of which rooted for the fall of Assad’s government. Even the progressive wing of the Democratic Party censured Tulsi Gabbard for shining a light on the dirty war. The engineered coup in Ukraine was done out in the open. Nuland, though caught saying “Fuck the EU”, remained in her position to turn up the pressure. Trump remained in Syria in the name of combating ISIS but then had Soleimani, the man who’d done most to fight the lunatics, assassinated, and there was zero outrage in the West or the world community.
Fast forward to the present, and Israel does an attack on Iran that was far worse than Pearl Harbor, and the entire West defends Israel and justifies the attack as Israel defending itself. At the very least, Japan’s perfidy in the Pearl Harbor attack didn’t entail murdering the US leadership. Japan targeted the US navy to buy time in securing its position in the Pacific. In contrast, Israel targeted the entire Iranian leadership and during negotiations.
Also, Israel has many nukes, obtained by theft of nuclear material from the US, whereas Iran has always opted not to develop them, preferring to display their means to build them if given no choice. Yet, the West insists that the Jewhadis of Israel are justified in targeting foreign leaders for assassination and fully entitled to the support of the US that followed up the dastardly attack with bombing runs against Iran’s civilian nuclear sites.
There was a time when the West, for all its mendacity and murderousness, felt obliged to keep up appearances of legitimacy in the eyes of the world. But now, the world has become so inured to the West as Jewish Gangster Paradise that no one bats an eye when the US and NATO serve as little more than hitmen and lawyers for Jewish-supremacist kingpins. Of course, much of the world is waking up and quietly preparing counter-moves, but they remain fearful of the West gone nuts.
Take the recent kerfuffle with India. What was that about? Again, it was Jewish gangsterism’s finger on US foreign/economic policy. Indians, in having maintained good relations with Israel and Jewish-Americans in Big Tech, finance, & pharma, thought Jewish Power would overlook and ‘forgive’ India’s business relations with Russia. But nope. It has to be the Jewish Way or the highway. It doesn’t matter that India has appeased or accommodated Global Jewish Power in myriad ways. India’s good relations with Russia, a country Jews want destroyed and conquered for the Tribe, means that it must be punished and humiliated, brought back into the fold as Jews have done time and time again with white cucks, now reduced to brownnosing embarrassments. As far as Jews are concerned, Indians must readily obey, fetch, and roll over, just like white dogs do. Indeed, what are elite colleges in the West(that train whites and nonwhites alike) but obedience schools for goy canines? Jews make an offer you can’t refuse.
In THE GODFATHER, it didn’t matter that Moe Green did favors for the Corleone family. Michael was determined to buy him out and that was that. In THE GODFATHER PART 2, it didn’t matter that Michael was eager to do business with Hyman Roth. Roth targeted him for death one way or the other.
The more sensible parts of the world are waking up to this fact. Jewish Power is like the Terminator. “It can’t be bargained with. It can’t be reasoned with. It doesn’t feel pity, or remorse, or fear. And it absolutely will not stop… ever, until you are dead!” It explains the frustration of observing those silly Russians or stupid Iranians still thinking they can come to some kind of an understanding with World Jewry. The Netanminator will not stop until it has fulfilled its mission.
While many Jews, even his supporters, are well-aware of Netanyahu’s loathsome qualities, they nevertheless admire him as the ultimate Tough Jew, the Hebrew Hammer, the Merciless Mensch. It’s no wonder that Trump, despite his misgivings, regards Netanyahu as a kind of soul-brother. Both play to the tune of Frank Sinatra’s “(I Did It) My Way”. For the longest time, Jews wormed into goy power structures and cajoled & pled for favors. As rich and influential as they were, they had to play secondary roles, like Henry Kissinger at Richard Nixon’s side. In contrast, Netanyahu with chutzpah-on-steroids simply barges into Western Capitals, pulls his dong out, savagely rams every Western politician in the arse, and forces him or her to shriek, “I like it, I like it.” The vile unabashed gangster chieftain Erdogan has a similar appeal to the Turks. Netanyahu has turned Western Politics into an Adam Sandler movie, HAPPY GILMORE come-to-life. On some level, even Jews who despise him can’t help but be impressed, like Dark Helmut by the Druish princess.
Now, as to how the Jewish Power Network might have played a role in 9/11, there are several factors to consider. First, were they enough Jews in the upper echelons of power who were bold and ‘crazy’ enough to pull such a stunt? One look at Netanyahu or Victoria Nuland, and the answer is yes. Such ‘crazy’ Jews migrated from the margins to the very centers of global power. Psychologically, the Jewish Power Network came to tolerate, groom, and elevate the most extreme kinds of personalities. As several ex-government officials have recounted, agents of Israel enjoyed virtual security clearance through the US deep state. The US became, after all, a country where Arnon Milchan could come and go as he pleased despite his open admission of having stolen US material for the Israeli nuclear program. No one dared touch him. If the US in the Sixties was hesitant to probe too deeply into the USS Liberty incident, imagine the mood in the 1990s, let alone the 2000s.
Then, it was no surprise that Jonathan Pollard, once deemed the worst traitor in US history, was pardoned and soon after allowed to fly to Israel to a hero’s welcome without any protestation from US officials of either party. It used to be Jewish crooks in the West had to flee to Israel undercover. Now, they’re flown to Israel in luxury jets.
The Reagan Era was still a time when a treacherous Jew might face the music. Had Pollard pulled his trick in the 2000s, everyone in the Deep State would likely have just looked the other way. We live in a time when Jews run circles around us with the Epstein affair. Back in the day, Israel would have been more discreet in lionizing figures like Pollard. In our time, the Adelsons flew Pollard to Israel on a private jet, and Netanyahu welcomed him on the tarmac before a thousand cameras. So, Israel regards the biggest traitor in US history as one of its greatest heroes, and all US politicians ever say is “Israel is our greatest ally.”
Then, psychologically, yes, there could have been plenty of Jews ‘crazy’ enough to take part in 9/11, especially as White America, especially Boomer America, had totally succumbed to the Jewish spell. Looking back, it’s downright tragicomic that people like Patrick Buchanan, who called for an end to empire and a more modest US role in the world, were smeared and sidelined as extremists or crazies while the pathological, racial-supremacist, warmongering, and genocidal Neocons were presented as the moderate and ‘compassionate’ wing of American Conservatism.
Neoconservatives fooled a lot of people, perhaps even themselves, due to their exodus from the Left to the Right. Thus, they were regarded as more tolerant, moderate, and varied in their outlooks in contrast to the Paleo-Cons and Old Guard Rock-Ribbed Republicans rigidly set in their ways and still fighting the old fight with the New Deal and the Civil Rights Movement. Having seen politics through both the leftist and the rightist lenses, Neoconservatives were supposedly more free-thinking, flexible, and creative in their policy proposals.
Unlike ultra-libertarians for whom free markets were everything, Neoconservatives understood the need for social programs for the needy. Unlike hardline Christian conservatives, Neoconservatives appreciated the secular principles of Americanism. And unlike white racial conservatives, Neoconservatives understood that all races and ethnic groups would have to be accommodated in the spirit of liberty and equality.
In contrast to the Neoconservatives, pugnacious figures like Patrick Buchanan were regarded as hardline, extreme, even ‘far right’ and ‘crypto-fascist’. The favorite goy figure of the Neoconservatives, John McCain, was lauded as a man willing to work with all sides, earning praise from the Democrats as well. At a time when Reaganism was melding with Clintonism in the US and Thatcherism was with Blairism in the UK, Old School Conservatism seemed outdated, even offensively so.
Indeed, following George H.W. Bush’s defeat in 1992, the consensus among mainstream conservatives was that Buchanan had disgraced the Party with a demagogic rabble-rousing speech at the GOP convention, which some Jews said would have sounded better in German.
Yet, upon closer scrutiny, one could have just as easily argued the opposite. Buchanan, in defending the US working class, was calling for economic moderation among Republicans, i.e. GDP growth and ‘free trade’ aren’t the end all of American conservatism. Also, given the end of the Cold War, why not give up on empire and focus more on problems at home? In other words, Buchanan was arguing against greed and war.
Meanwhile, the Neoconservatives, who’d once presented themselves as newcomers to the movement with fresh ideas about fixing America’s problems, morphed into Neocons obsessed with Jewish identity & power, Zionist imperialism, unfettered economic gangsterism, warmongering, and ideological intolerance hellbent on purging any remnant in the GOP that dared to oppose their Agenda. It was one of the greatest bait-and-switch operations in US history.
Given the Jewish political-psychological profile, is it farfetched to speculate that Jewish infiltrators(posing as radical Muslims) persuaded the Jihadi elements to ‘think big’ and go for the head of the snake, hitting NY and DC? Why not, considering that Jews pulled the same stunt with Western Liberals, white conservatives, and the Christian Zionists? Jewish Neocons persuaded George W. Bush that he’s the New Churchill at war with Islamo-Hitlers. In some ways, the Jewish pitch to the Republican Party to invade Iraq(that had nothing to do with 9/11) was even more outlandish than the hypothetical Jewish pitch to the radical Muslims. After all, whereas the US was indeed the world capital of Jewish Power(thereby a threat to the Islamic world), Hussein’s Iraq was hardly a sanctuary for Jihadi elements, let alone a nuclear threat purportedly acquiring yellow cake to build nukes inside aluminum canisters to set off a thousand more 9/11’s. Whereas the radical Muslim plot, crazy as it was, had some rationale and basis in political reality, the notion of George W. Bush as New Churchill preventing another 9/11 by stopping Hussein from building a nuke was a fantasy worthy of Hollywood.
Yet, the US administration, along with the UK and the Coalition-of-the-Shilling, willfully swallowed the poison pill as a panacea. And supposedly 80% of Americans were sold on the idea of Hussein as the next big terrorist threat with tons of WMD just waiting to be unleashed on various Western cities. If Jews could persuade the most sophisticated elites, the product of Ivy League schools and the like, into swallowing such a fantasy, it would have been a cakewalk to convince a bunch of low-IQ Muslims that it’s really a good idea to hit NY and DC with the hope that Allah will come to their aid and destroy the Infidel West.
Stanley Kubrick’s film THE KILLING is rather instructive in how 9/11 might have been staged. In the film, the heist requires three sets of actors. Those who carry out the robbery with guns, those who clear the path for the robbers, and those hired to do specific jobs with no knowledge of the plot. Though the actual robbers became the focus of the authorities, no less instrumental to the success of the operation were the enablers, the infiltrators who opened a door or shut an eye here and there so as to allow the robbers to gain access to the money room, and the distractors.
Chess is a far more complicated game than checkers, and the Muslim dummies were playing checkers whereas the Jews were playing chess. While, despite the scale jumbo jets slamming into buildings, the actual plot was rather simple, essentially one of getting the Muslims onboard so they could do their thing, there were clearly variables that might complicate the operation, and this is where the chess-mindset was crucial in anticipating the bugs that might despoil the plan. What if the Muslims were picked up by US intelligence or local authorities before carrying out the attack? Then, no wonder they had to be tracked by the Jews and eased into subsequent phases of the plan until they finally boarded the planes. As for the targets, some have surmised that explosives were planted in the Twin Towers lest the planes fail to bring them down, especially in light of the buildings having collapsed at free fall speed usually associated with well-planned professional demolitions; and there was also the strange case of Building 7. The attack on the Pentagon was also suspect given that it must have been no easy feat for the terrorist pilot to strike such a flat structure at the perfect angle of descent. If explosives were involved in the Twin Towers, the Jewish role in the operation entailed preparations far bigger than facilitating Muslim radicals into airplanes. Instinct says the owner of the Twin Towers, Larry Silverstein, was in on the plot. Not as a plotter but collaborator for reasons tribal(for the Jews) and personal(big profits from insurance).
One possible complication was rather rudimentary: What if the airline personnel and the passengers resisted and foiled the plot, as supposedly happened in the case of United 93 that crashed into Pennsylvania, thereby sparing one of the designated targets?
But history of hijackings suggests most people tend to comply out of fear. Also, ironically enough, years of Jewish programming via media and academia had created a White Western/American mentality allergic to any accusation of ‘racism’. Thus, American authorities and civilians who might have suspected something might have held their tongue lest they be considered as ‘racist’. (Indeed, even after 9/11, the policy wasn’t to target suspicious Muslim-or-Arab-looking types but virtually EVERYONE, even old white ladies who were patted down in airports.)
Race dynamics through the years resulted in a White Race paralyzed into cuckery. White America did nothing while blacks burned down L.A. and other cities following the Rodney King verdict. Fast forward to 2020, and cucked White America buried its head in fear as BLM, Antifa, and Woke mobs ransacked cities. Even supposedly proud Southern White Males didn’t lift a finger to preserve the Robert E. Lee monument from being melted down by Negroes to the fiendish delight of anti-white Jews who funded BLM and the like. In Kenosha, Wisconsin, the white police had stand-down orders not to interfere with violent mobs burning buildings and looting stores. When one guy, Kyle Rittenhouse, took action to defend the community, he was persecuted and nearly thrown in prison for life for defending himself against lunatic rioters. And when Jews pushed the insane Covid lockdowns, White America mostly complied like stupid sheep.
Thus, Jews read White America correctly on the eve of 9/11. Most white American personnel and passengers would likely do nothing when the hijackers kicked into gear. They’d be like the police in Kenosha or Portland who just stood around and did nothing while lunatics gave them the middle finger and smashed windows. (Such cuckery also explains the savagery of what happened at Abu Ghraib. So emasculated on the race issue at home, white US soldiers found an outlet for their repressed rage abroad among the ‘ragheads’ on whom open season was declared in the War on Terror.)
One of the best representatives of Jewish political psychology is David Mamet, a man who revels in the nihilism of the game(usually of wit but no honor) and wallows in the self-pity of victimhood. In Mamet’s universe, the cosmic law exists for the smart to hoodwink the dumb, the strong to exploit the weak, the savvy to trick the sincere. And if you lose in this game, you’re just a sore loser or weak wussy who can’t stomach or play the game to win. Mamet’s worldview comports with that of Alan Dershowitz who says Jewish Domination is totally justified on account of bigger brains and bigger balls, and so, Jews should never apologize, not even the likes of Epstein presumably.
Yet, the other side of Mamet is always bitching and whining about ‘antisemitism’, how the world hates Jews for no reason. Now, let me get this straight. If Mamet’s Jewish worldview celebrates the smart(such as the Jews) taking advantage of the dumb(most goyim) and/or the naive(people with childlike mentality), wouldn’t this feed into goy rage and resentment? If Jews revel in such games, goyim have only two choices: Submit or push back. According to Mamet’s Law, stupid or naive goyim should just accept Jewish domination as cosmic justice because the Chosenites are simply better at the game.
It’s like blacks feel justified in their violence as the badass predator race vis-a-vis the nonblack prey races. Like it’s natural for lions to devour wildebeest in the wild, it’s only right for black gangstas to take from ‘faggoty-ass’ non-blacks.
Like the Jews, blacks wallow in both nihilism and victimization. If blacks go around looting and burning but are shot, blacks howl and bitch about ‘muh victimhood’. It’s no wonder Jewish nihilist-victimologists promoted Ibrahim X. Kendi as an ideological partner-in-crime. Both Jews and blacks think like gangsters in GOODFELLAS who have nothing but contempt for the law; the world owes them everything, and if you object, you are the problem as some ‘racist’ or ‘Anti-Semite’.
A combination of nihilism and victimology is at the heart of Jewish Supremacism, which, from a clinical perspective, would be capable of 9/11. Arrogant in their conviction that they got the biggest brains and biggest balls and could get away with just about anything while simultaneously oh-so sensitive about their poor pitiful selves as the victims of never-ending ‘antisemitism’. We hear it from Netanyahu’s lips all the time. Jewish Hitler as custodian of Anne Frank’s memory. Ultra-nihilism and total self-pity, a combo as dangerous as drinking and driving.
Jewish political neurosis, though dangerous(and having the potential for setting off World War III), is no great mystery. It is arguably the greatest power of all time in its control of the Lone Superpower and its vast array of vassals, but it is also the most fragile. Israel may be the most powerful state in the Middle East but is surrounded by much larger ‘hostile’ Arab and/or Muslim states. Jewish Americans, for all their power and wealth, are a tiny minority over the goyim who may be breaking out of the Jewish spell.
Jews tend to play up their paranoia. Jews and their cuck-collaborators usually defend Israel as a tiny island of democracy surrounded on all sides by a vast ocean of Muslim backwardness, barbarism, and ‘antisemitism’, an easy ploy as a cursory look at the map would indicate as much: Israel, the size of New Jersey, surrounded by much bigger states that supposedly want to destroy the only Jewish State in the world. In fact, the geopolitical narrative on Israel and its neighbors is a joke. Ignoramuses often assume that all those Arab and/or Muslim states are united politically and militarily against Israel, but that’s never been the case, as hardly anything of substance emerged from the Pan-Arab stirrings in the Sixties. Thus, it was never a case of Israel vs the Arab/Muslim world but of various Middle East states, Jewish and Islamic, set against one another. Egypt and Libya were sworn enemies. Iraq and Iran hated one another. The Saudis and United Arab Emirates were firmly in the pocket of the West. So, even though most Arab and/or Muslim rhetorically supported the Palestinians and condemned Israeli policies, the majority of Arab/Muslim states were more or less compliant with the agenda of the US(under the influence of the Jewish Lobby). Did the larger Arab/Turkic/Muslim world come to the aid of Libya and Syria when they came into the crosshairs of the Zionist-controlled West? No, the larger Muslim world either did nothing or joined in like jackals to tear off pieces for themselves. Some Arab or Muslim unity.
In fact, the Arab/Muslim world has been plagued by divisions and internecine feuds, making it easy for the US and Israel to play divide-and-conquer by pitting one bunch of Arab/Muslim dummies against others. Not that the goy dynamic has been any different in the US and the West. Jews masterfully play divide and rule among the various goy groups in the US and EU. Red States vs Blue States, ‘Woke’ vs MAGA, Christian Zionists vs LGBTQXYZ groups, ‘far right’ vs ‘far left’, and etc. Jews employed BLM and ‘woke’ mobs in 2020 like Israel manipulated ISIS in Syria. Jews programmed TPUSA white Christian conservatives to support Israel but also programmed ‘woke’ idiots to celebrate the murder of Charlie Kirk, and then exploited the outrage to justify Trump’s crackdown on ‘hate speech’, mostly concerning criticism of Israel of course. Jews might now be undoing things by doing too much.
Contrary to the endless ADL alarmism about the dangers of ‘antisemitism’, most Americans of all stripes hardly cared about Jewish money or power. If anything, most admired Jews as successful Americans. Nonetheless, the paranoia led to Jews overplaying their hands and insisting on the elites of all groups pledging absolute fealty to the Jews, resulting in the most humiliating exhibitions of cuckery that made ordinary people take notice and wonder if indeed Jews did control everything.
Don’t double down on fixing what isn’t broken and operate on the basis of give-and-take and mutual respect. Instead, the Jewish Rule of Lawfare insisted on the Jewish right to dump on goyim and the goyim’s duty to bend the knee. Jews can hump you and dump you, but you better pump their egos, or the humpty-dumpty rule.
Even Charlie Kirk, who spent the better part of his young life cucking to Zion, couldn’t help opining that Jews, who bitch most about ‘antisemitism’, are the biggest purveyors of anti-white-ism, the kind that says whites are ineradicably evil at their innate core. The Jewish humpty-dumpty rule has grown global in scope and is the main reason for America’s increasingly abrasive relations with other countries. The reason for US-Russia tensions is almost entirely Jewish. Worsening relations with China is the product of Jewish exaggeration of ‘Yellow Peril’ as a distraction from the noticing of Jewish Power. As such, America’s hostility made China grow closer to Russia, which angered Jews even more, resulting in more anti-Chinese propaganda, which then made China grow even closer to Russia, and so on and on, just because everything has to be the Jewish Way or the Highway. Why did the US pressure India to sever ties with Russia? Again, the only group obsessed with Russia in the US are the Jews for reasons ancient(“The Tsar did pogroms on us”) and supremacist(“Dumb Russians are undeserving of the vast resources that should belong to superior Jews”). Why the worsening tensions with Venezuela? Its sovereignty means good relations with Iran and sympathy for the Palestinians.
Jews are using the Lone Superpower to play whack-a-mole with the entire world, sometimes with success but increasingly with failure. As long as Jews control US politicians and decide which countries are allowed access to US markets, still the most important in the world, they hold a lot of sway.
However, their boundless chutzpah and bluster, often amplified by their cuck-minions, are an affront to the pride of other countries. China and India want to do business with the US, but their political legitimacy is based on sovereignty and independence, especially in the context of their official anti-imperialist narratives. In the past, the US was more discreet in its demands, but the art of diplomacy seems a lost art. It used to be that the US would ask China, India, Russia, or some other country to suck its dick behind the curtain, and the latter might do just that to gain access to US markets. The dick was sucked but in secret. But now, the US is demanding the world to suck its dick on the big stage for all to see. So, Trump the cuck-dog of Jews tells the Indian prime minister Modi, “Hey you dirty Hindu who shit outdoors, come here and suck my dick and then go bite Putin in the balls.”
It’s a humiliation ritual, like the TV game show FEAR FACTOR that dared people do the grossest things for cash and prizes. It’s long been understood that kids who were physically abused tend to become bullies. Belittled as a child, they seek emotional compensation by belittling others. A similar dynamic seems to be in play with the cuck goyim, especially white ones. They’ve been so belittled and humiliated by Jewish Power that they try to regain their pride or manhood by intimidating, threatening, or attacking others. Trump, constantly humped in the arse by Netanyahu, is desperate to regain his manhood by humping Modi in the arse. Lindsey Graham, after a lifetime of sucking Zionist dongs, turns to the world and says, “Suck my dick”. A foreign policy that is indistinguishable from FEAR FACTOR is surely not the wise approach. “Hey Modi, go lie down in the scorpion pit.”
Even if Jewish elements had a role in 9/11, most Jews would have been appalled by any idea of Zionists engineering such a plot. Most certainly, many knowledgeable Jews privately nursed doubts about the official narrative, even suspecting the involvement of Israel and/or the Neocons. But given the outsized role that Holocaust Memory and Antisemitism have on the Jewish Psyche, the Jewish plotters of 9/11 likely wagered that virtually all Jews would remain silent in fear of anti-Jewish backlash.
The dice had been rolled, and the Jewish community was left with no choice. It had to roll with the War on Terror narrative because the alternative, the suspicion that Jews-done-it, would not only have dealt a blow to Jewish influence and prestige but, in the worst case scenario, given rise to something like Neo-Nazism(as sensationalized in Philp Roth’s PLOT AGAINST AMERICA, ironically written when Neocons had managed to do just that).
One thing for sure, Neoconservatism ended up redefining ‘antisemitism’. It went from “blaming Jews for what they didn’t do” to “questioning Jews for what they might have done.” It demanded unconditional obeisance to Jewish Power and gushing wholehearted support, which explains the Jewish outrage at any criticism of the Gaza Genocide. How dare these goyim get so uppity?
Sadly, Boomer goyim, rigid in their state of PhiloSemitism, are beyond redemption. The likes of Lindsey Graham, Mitt Romney, Sean Hannity, Mike Huckabee, and etc. have not only grown accustomed to Zionist dongs up their bungs but grown to love them, rather like Chinese men with their queues as symbols of submission to Manchu rule. When you can’t teach new tricks to old dogs, it’s up to younger folks to learn something other than fetch, sit, and roll over.
Perhaps, we’ll never know the whole truth about 9/11, that is unless there’s radical change in Israel itself and its archives are flung open, like the Soviet archives for a spell in the 1990s. Maybe when hell freezes over.
One thing for sure, the authorities(under whatever orders) hastened the destruction of material evidence that might have pointed to culprits other than the radical Muslims. Some rules-based democracy we’re living in.
The most we can hope for is to be better aware of the nature of Zion and what it’s capable of. Beware of official narratives, remind oneself that the so-called ‘leaders’ of the West are bought-and-sold shills of Zionist oligarchs, and know that all the ‘mainstream media’ are propaganda wings of Jewish billionaires working in tandem with the Deep State led by appointees of shabbos goyim who serve the Jewish Lobby. If sufficiently vigilant, at the very least, the world can prevent another 9/11.
No comments:
Post a Comment