The Myth of Jewish Reciprocity, or the Bogosity of the If-Hitler-Had-Been-Nice-to-the-Jews Argument

 

The What-If’s make for interesting historical debate. Few developments were inevitable in history, though plenty of events were more likely than not to happen. There were forks along the road, and the current history in which we live is the product of the paths that were taken by those in power.
‘History’ in the generic sense means the documented/recorded and analyzed story of just about anything, e.g. the history of some small town called Bumbleville with the population of 200, the history of fly-fishing, the history of toy-making, and etc. But in the grand sense, History means the Story of Power, and for good or for ill, a small handful of people got to decide the fates of mankind.

If Current History is the product of what is remembered, it is as much, if not more so, about what has been forgotten or is (consciously)repressed. In a way, it’s like the workings of the human mind, a storage of countless details of events, incidents, and eccentricities of our lives.
However, depending on our profession and/or purpose, we tend to focus solely on those things that are of relevance to our needs in the here-and-now. Suppose someone suffered a trauma as a victim. If he’s in the military as a leader of a squadron, he’ll likely push his self-pitying victim-narrative to the back-burner as he must exude strength and confidence. However, if his profession is therapeutic, he might invoke his own victimhood to convey empathy for those who suffered similarly.

Granted, Christianity(and modern Jewishness) perfected the art of combining self-pity with ruthless aggression: “Sanctified by our saintly suffering, we’re morally justified in beating the war drums and destroying our enemies.”
Because the media apparatus controls short-term active memory whereas the academia functions largely as storage of long-term dormant memory, the media exert far more influence on Current History, though, to be sure, given the sheer politicization of the academia, many ‘scholars’ are far less interested in the depth of knowledge than what’s most useful to fashionable agendas.

The Jewish-run media have a funny idea of the ‘enemy’. The supposed enemies of the US, more often than not, aren’t those countries that chose to be enemies but were designated as such on the basis of “Is it good for the Jews?” So, even though Russia has long wanted good relations with the US, it’s been an ‘enemy’ because it didn’t totally put out like a whore to World Jewry. And even though China doesn’t want to be an enemy, it’s hyped as such because Jews prefer Americans to fixate on Yellow Peril as a distraction from Jewish Domination of the West.
Even Iran, always placed at the top of the list as an enemy of the US, has sought working relations with the West. It too is a designated-enemy than an enemy-of-its-own-choosing.
Jewish Power is like a mad-bitch girlfriend who insists on deciding who her lover’s friends and enemies are. No matter how much someone wants to be his friend, he must reject him as an ‘enemy’ if the mad bitch whispers into his ears to do so.
As such, the US has ended up with so many unnecessary enemies, or enemies only because Jews have designated them as such. It means White America has no agency in deciding with whom it should be friends or enemies. Jews decide, whites follow. Notice how the US interfered in the Middle East in the name of fighting terrorists after 9/11 but now regards Syria as a ‘friendly country’ even though it’s ‘led’ by a Jihadist(though some say he’s a crypto-Jew).

History is vast, but Current History operates only in relation to active memory while 99% of historical memory remains dormant and buried. No wonder the Western Media got away with pushing the ‘unprovoked Russian invasion of Ukraine’ narrative. They keep buried all the histories of what had happened to Russia in the 1990s, how the West manipulated events in Ukraine with one Color Revolution after another, how the Kiev authority shelled civilians in Donbass, and etc.
Instead, the narrative activates the selective memories of autocratic Putin murdering dissidents and Russians barging into Ukraine. Same goes for the crisis surrounding Iran. Instead of a complex narrative, we get a cookie-cutter cartoon about tyrannical mullahs secretly cooking up a Bomb, presumably to blow up London and NY, along with Israel. Never mentioned are Israel’s support of terrorism(and its own founding through terrorist acts, not just against the Arabs but the British) and the dark story of its attaining the Bomb, as well as the fact it hasn’t been pressed upon to come clean on these matters.
At the deeper level, on matters of Jewish-and-Goy relations, for example, the active memory dwells on numerous instances of goy-on-Jewish hatred and/or violence while keeping in dormant storage all the details about Jewish contempt for goyim. The history of Jewish antipathy toward goyim is certainly shelved in the stacks but not placed on the lectern.

At any rate, things are even worse because so much of Current History operates not only on the basis of selective memory but distorted or even outright false memory. In other words, even the paths-not-taken are invoked as if they were. Iran long ago decided not to build the Bomb, which means it took the non-Bomb path when faced with several alternatives. But, the West speaks of Iran as if it took the path of the Bomb. Iran doesn’t have the Bomb, but the West prefers the What-If-Iran-Got-The-Bomb narrative as holy writ. Suppose you had the choice of stealing some expensive jewelry but chose not to, but people still speak of you as if you did.
Current History is often molded from Let’s-Pretend-History, i.e. let’s just pretend something happened even if it didn’t and go with that. Some idiot is likely to raise the question, “WHAT IF Iran had negotiated on the nuclear issue. Then, Israel and the US would not have attacked.” Yes, an interesting what-if, except that Iran was indeed negotiating with the US(as spokesman for Israel) but got attacked anyway by the collusion of Israel and the US deep state.

One of the big What-If’s of History concerns what might have been if Adolf Hitler and National Socialism hadn’t been Anti-Jewish or Anti-Semitic. What if it had been more like Italian Fascism, at least prior to its drastic revision on the Jewish Question following the alliance with Germany. (Incidentally, National Socialist Germany probably would have weathered the storm had it not been so anti-Russo-Slavic, a more important what-if.)

But then, how would one define Anti-Jewishness in this context? Even if one isn’t anti-Jewish but is opposed to the agendas favored by Jews, one could be perceived by Jews as the enemy. Take all those Christian Zionist zealots who fetishize Jews and allow themselves to be exploited by the Tribe. Do Jews merely find them useful(but distasteful regardless) or truly regard them as a friendly people? Even as Jews accept the support of the Evangelicals, they do everything to push policies that demean and degrade Christian power in the US.

The politics of Liking-the-Jews is fraught with dangers because of the tribalist-supremacist-exclusionary attitudes of Judaism and Jewishness. Besides, many Jews are merely ethnically Jewish and define their truer identity in association with ideology; therefore, if you have no problem with Jewishness per se but disagree with Jewish-favored agendas, you could still be construed as ‘anti-Jewish’, e.g. “If you’re anti-cosmopolitan, then you could be anti-Jewish because Jews take pride in their supposedly rootless cosmopolitanism.”

The politics of Liking-Jews is like the politics of Liking-Nazis. Even if Russians expressed affection for Nazi Germans, the latter’s ideology was invested in enslaving/exterminating the Russians. Palestinians found out the hard way with the way of the Jews. Many Palestinians were favorably disposed to the Jews and didn’t object to Jewish immigration in the early years of Modern Palestine; many Palestinians even welcomed Jewish arrivals, but Zionism was predicated on, by hook and by crook, taking over the land and displacing the Palestinians. It had a mini-me Lebensraum Plan. (And how did it turn out for the American Indians who took a liking to the Pilgrims and fed them a turkey dinner?)

Because of the very nature of Talmudic Judaism, which is ethno-spiritually contemptuous of lowly goyim, and the very nature of Jewishness, which is monomaniacal in its ideological worldviews — “We Neocons are right about everything and must have everything our way, and that’s that” — , Liking-Jews is hardly enough to satisfy the Jews. Imagine you telling Bob, “You know, Bob, I think you’re a swell guy, and I like you”, but that’s not enough for Bob to like you back; you must agree with everything he says, must believe whatever he believes, and must do as he tells you, even if doing so may cause harm to yourself and your loved ones.

Given the nature of National Socialism, its hypothetical Philo-Semitism might still have been regarded as ‘Anti-Semitic’ or Anti-Jewish to many Jews. Even if National Socialism had excised the racial aspect of its ‘antisemitism’, it still would have found itself in opposition to much of Jewish power, influence, and proclivities. Suppose National Socialism welcomed and embraced those Jews who were willing to be Good Germans and patriots. Thus, it wouldn’t have been opposed to Jews as a race, i.e. as long as Jews were willing to make common cause with the Germans, they could be good comrades. Now, certain German Jews would surely have taken the bargain, either out of genuine admiration for National Socialism or mere opportunism. But would this have spared National Socialist Germany from the accusation of being anti-Jewish or Anti-Semitic from the perspective of World Jewry?
Christianity, after all, isn’t an racial credo, therefore not opposed to Jews on the basis of blood. If Jews convert to Christianity and become good Christians, they’re welcome as brothers and sisters. But has the lack of racial antisemitism in Christianity lessened the general Jewish hostility toward and contempt for Christianity?

National Socialism, even had it been accepting of Jews, would still have pressed upon them to favor German-ness over Jewishness as the primary object of loyalty. World Jewry might have had an issue with such a demand.
Indeed, during the Cold War, what was the main beef that Jews had with the Soviet Union? In the communist empire, Jews could work in any profession. They were accepted as good comrades. They weren’t discriminated against on the basis of Jewish identity. The problem arose ONLY IF Jews favored Jewish-Tribal or Jewish-Global interests over their loyalty to the Soviet Union.
Thus, even though the Soviet Union provided the Jews with the same rights that all other groups were entitled to, no more but no less, this pissed off many Jews around the world and turned them against the USSR.
In contrast, the Jews came to favor the US because it allowed for and then even celebrated Jewish Exceptionalism, which eventually turned into full-blown Jewish Supremacism that now forces all the West to revolve around Jewish megalomania. Such being the way of Jewishness, could Jews have come to terms with a National Socialist Germany that accepted Jews on the basis of their primary loyalty being to Germany? Probably not.

For Jews, getting ‘something’(which is what most people can hope for) isn’t enough. They must have EVERYTHING. Given the nature of National Socialism, it could offer Jews ‘something’ but not everything. Also, Jews had to agree to the terms of German patriotism, i.e Jewishness would have to be subsumed into the German national polity. Also, Jews would have to renounce parasitism, gangsterism, radicalism, and degeneracy they’d become so closely associated with during the Weimar Era, which most Germans regarded as Hell but which many Jews regarded as Heaven, much like Russia in the 1990s, a time when the bottom fell off for most Russians while sky was the limit for the Jews. Could World Jewry have accepted such terms?

At any rate, let’s assume that some kind of amity could have been reached between the National Socialist Germans and World Jewry. This Germany wouldn’t have been racially anti-Jewish and would have accepted Jews as fellow patriots(if willing to submit to the ideology of National Socialism), but it still would have been at odds with many attitudes and agendas pervasive among Jews at the time.
Still, as this Germany wouldn’t have been hostile to Jewishness per se, World Jewry might have chosen to do business with it.
Besides, we must keep in mind that this was before World War II and the Holocaust that would later elevate Jews to holy status. Back in the 1930s, even so-called Liberal Democracies had prominent figures in arts and politics who openly discussed the baleful influence of certain Jewish elements. By today’s standards of utterly deranged Philo-Semitism, even the US of the interwar period was ‘rabidly and virulently Anti-Semitic’, e.g. there was no shame in WASP clubs explicitly excluding Jews from membership and there were plenty of Christians preaching, “Yes, the Jews did kill Christ.”

With World Jewry tempering or withholding its hostility against Germany in the West, there might have been less resistance to Hitler’s territorial ambitions with neighboring nations. Also, had war broken out between Germany and the Soviet Union, the West might have either sided with Germany(against the ‘Asiatic’ commie hordes) or, at the very least, remained neutral, all the while doing business with Germany and supplying it with necessary material. Not that this would have ensured German victory over the USSR, but the Germans would have better shot at winning.

What bogged the Germans down in World War II was the repeat of the two-front war, though, to be sure, it was by their own design as the Germans had attacked the USSR first, whereby the most interesting What-If question is, “What if Germany had kept the peace with the USSR?”, notwithstanding alternative theories that Stalin had his own plans to advance westward.
Even though Germany became embroiled in war with the West(Britain and France) before with the East(Soviet Union), Hitler’s grand vision entailed an eventual clash with the East(while hoping for peace with the West).
Jewish influence played a significant part in swaying the British elites toward conflict with Germany. The influence was either direct(via monetary control over politicians) or indirect(via manipulation of paranoia about Germany as a threat to its British hegemony).
Jewish indirect influence also came by way of control of fashionable ideology, i.e. even those goy elites and elite-aspirants, who hardly thought about Jewish matters, fell under the spell of Jewish-biased intellectual norms that came to favor the Left over the Right. Thus, even though the New Deal actually had more in common with National Socialism as an economic policy, many Progressive types either idealized the Soviet system or were less antagonistic to it than to National Socialism, which was seen as a monstrosity.

At any rate, Jewish influence in the UK and US might not have been so unrelentingly anti-German had Hitler’s Germany not been so virulently anti-Jewish. Still, World Jewry might have been nearly as hostile to this hypothetical Germany simply because its economic program and political agenda(even if not anti-Jewish) stood in the way of finance-capitalism of the Western Jews and Marxism-Leninism of the Eastern Jews. (After all, the CIA toppled many governments even if they weren’t anti-American or anti-capitalist simply because their economic policies conflicted with US corporate interests.)
One thing for sure, had Hitler’s Germany been on better terms with the West, Stalin would have been far more vigilant about the German threat, thereby preventing the heavy losses suffered by the USSR in Operation Barbarossa.

One oft-heard argument is that Germany’s antisemitism lost out big in one crucial area: Science, so crucial to military technology. As some of the brightest minds in the German territories were Jews, their exile greatly benefitted the US(that soon became an enemy of Germany) and their persecution(or even elimination) denied German science of key talent. This argument is made especially in relation to the development of the atomic bomb, in the making of which Jewish scientists in the US played a significant role.

But, this argument isn’t quite convincing given the chronology of events. The US was untouched by war and had more manpower, wealth, and resources than the other great powers. Thus, it could invest more heavily into the atomic program than its peer competitors could. But even with all the effort and expenditure, the US produced the Bomb only in 1945 and after Germany’s defeat.
If the US, with all its advantages, just barely produced the Bomb in the last year of the conflict, it’s hardly likely that Germany, with more limited funds and resources, could have done any better even if it had kept its Jewish scientists.
Most likely, no such weapon could have been produced in time to use against the Soviets who would have rolled into Berlin by then. If Mainland USA, which was untouched by war, took so long to build the Bomb, what was the chance that Germany, already at war and expending the bulk of its resources against the Soviets, could have done any better even with the aid of Jewish scientists?

Video Link

But for the sake of argument, let’s suppose Jewish scientists in Germany had the magic touch and could have procured the Bomb for Hitler much earlier, say in 1942 or 1943(when the tide decisively turned in favor of the Soviets). Equipped with the Bomb, the Germans could now blow up entire divisions of the Soviet army and then blow up Soviet cities up too. And so, Germany wins, in which case Hitler’s gamble of being-nice-to-Jews would have paid off.
But, what would this have done to Jewish moral reputation? Jews would have played a key role in supplying madman Hitler with the ultimate weapon to conquer and destroy an entire civilization. Jews would have to share in the Nazi Guilt with the Germans in the horrifying campaign of enslavement and extermination in the East. It’d be like a much grander version of the current Judeo-Nazi alliance in Ukraine.

The biggest sigh of relief of World War II was that Russia somehow survived and prevailed over its ‘existential’ enemy. Sure, communism sucked and Stalin was a monster, but Hitler didn’t invade to liberate the Eastern Slavs(and other ethnic groups) from communism but to enslave them under Nazism. If Jews had made the Bomb for Hitler, the greatest Jewish minds would have been complicit in one of the greatest crimes in history.
Had they been offered an equal partnership in the conquest and carving up of Russia, would German Jews(and/or World Jewry) have taken the bait, especially if Hitler promised to enslave/exterminate the Russo-Slavs but spare the Jewish Bolsheviks? If so, it seems Hitler’s antisemitism did Jews a favor for preventing their participation in one of history’s ghastliest ventures.

Video Link

Whether the hypothetical Jewish-German alliance would have been viable or not, there’s plenty of evidence to the contrary that Being-Nice-to-Jews is any guarantee of Jewish reciprocity.
One conundrum is that Jewish Power is almost never satisfied with ‘enough’ and wants everything. If ‘enough’ is offered, it’s seen as an insult to Jewish pride(of mono/megalomania). But then, giving the Jews everything they want is no guarantee either because Jews will look upon anyone or any people who’d do that as a bunch of suckers and retards, so dumb as to deserve being robbed of everything. Anyway one looks at it, it’s a lose-lose situation as long as the Jews are in megalomaniacal and supremacist mode, which is ingrained in the guts-and-minds of many Jews. Give them ‘enough’, and Jews want ‘everything’. Give them ‘everything’, and Jews lose all respect for the dummies who fell for the swindle. Does Paulie have any respect for the restaurant owner: “F*** you, Pay me.”

Video Link

Let’s consider some examples of Liking-Jews didn’t pay off in Jews-Liking-Back. The Arabs in Palestine were initially welcoming of Jewish settlers. Some even welcomed Jewish immigrants into their homes. Given this reality, did the Zionists settle for some kind of mutual understanding between the two groups? No, the furtive plan of the Jews, even when they were on friendly terms with the Arabs, was always to create the conditions whereby the Jews would collectively ambush the Palestinians and drive them from their lands. Zionists speak of how they had no choice but to fight off the hostile Arabs, but the fact remains that the early Jewish settlers in Palestine were mostly met with friendly or indifferent Arabs. The violence resulted from the gradual realization among the Arabs that the Jews not-so-secretly meant to displace them and grab the entirety of the Holy Land for the Jews(mostly of European descent).

If Jews really want something, they can’t settle for a compromise and must have it all. The so-called Two-State Solution, for example, was just smoke-and-mirrors to create the illusion of compromise while the Jewish State always planned to use tyranny and terror to drive out the Palestinians and annex the territories into Greater Israel. And every success whets Jewish Supremacist appetite for more and more. Notice what the Greater Israel project has done to Iraq, Libya, and Syria, now a carcass for Israel and its ally Turkey to tear apart and devour. And recently, Jews even made a move on Iran. All these years, Iran tried to meet the Jewish-controlled West halfway with promises not to build nuclear weapons, but there was no reciprocity from the Jewish side(that has many nukes aimed at Iran).

Next, consider the example of wartime Japan. Despite it being part of the Axis, Japan didn’t coordinate with Germany on a single battle. Their wars unfolded in separate spheres, which means that the Japanese, for all their horrible crimes, committed no atrocities against the Jews. Furthermore, Japan refused to abide by Germany’s racial ideology and policies regarding the Jews and, as such, contributed nothing to the Holocaust. If anything, key Japanese figures even provided protection for certain Jewish communities in Asia.
But, did any of this matter to Jewish-Americans with their outsized contribution to the making of the Bomb? Did Jews try to persuade the powers-that-be to spare Japan from being nuked, especially as Germany had already surrendered and Japan teetered on total defeat? No, Jews were happy to see the nukes dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It’s all the more disturbing considering that the US plan was to drop 10 or 12 more nukes if Japan didn’t surrender. It seems Jews would have been okay with that too.
So, if the Japanese hoped that Being-Nice to Jews during the war would have earned them some favors from the Jews, they were sorely mistaken. Jews were awfully proud of their Bomb and happy to have them vaporize the ‘Japs’ to demonstrate their genius and prowess.

Now, consider Iran with its long-existing Jewish community. It’s been well-documented that the Jews Iran are tolerated and well-treated. Whether under the Shah or the Ayatollah, the Jewish community has been left alone to practice its religion and do business. Indeed, the Islamic Republic of Iran has long maintained that their problem isn’t with Judaism but with Zionism as an imperialist and supremacist ideology. Iran has no problem with Jews living in the Holy Land. The problem is with Jewish Supremacist Zionists treating the Palestinians, Muslims and Christians alike, as inferior beings to knock around.
Even many Jews who are obsessed with anti-Iran feelings acknowledge that the Jewish community in Iran has long thrived there. There are no pogroms in Iran, let alone anything like a Holocaust.

Even through all these years when World Jewry effectively declared war on Iran, Iranian authorities refused to go the Nazi-like path and target the Jewish community for special punishment(or revenge against global Jewish Power). In other words, it avoided the moral mistakes of the Germans who committed acts like Kristallnacht.
But has global Jewish animus toward Iran been any less intense than the Jewish hatred for National Socialist Germany? No, Global Jewish Power has done just about anything to destroy Iran and reduce it to another anal-rape victim of Zion. Iran’s well-treatment of its Jewish population has meant absolutely NOTHING to its Zionist tormentors who’re hellbent on making Iran succumb under pressure to all the Jewish demands and then some.
Iranians can go out of their way to show that they are not Anti-Semitic(or Anti-Jewish), only Anti-Zionist(or Anti-Jewish-Supremacist), till the cows come home, but they’ll get no relief from the endless barrage of hatred, literal or rhetorical, from World Jewry that is now represented by the likes of Benjamin Netanyahu.
The Islamic Republic of Iran has been nothing like National Socialist Germany on the Jewish Question but has been just as reviled and targeted for destruction by the Empire of Judea.

Now, let’s consider post-communist Russia. In the 1990s, Jews got hold of that vast country through their puppet-whore Boris Yeltsin and looted just about everything they could get their hands on. Russian Jews, European Jews, Israeli Jews, and American Jews all coordinated their efforts to carve the flesh off the bones of Russia. It was like watching a school of piranhas going at a helpless mammal in the river. It was like watching jackals and seagulls devour the flesh of a beached whale. What Jews did to Russia in the 1990s may well go beyond what Jews did to Germany during the Weimar Era.

Given this reality, the post-Yeltsin government in Russia could have taken a hard line against the Jews. But Putin didn’t. Even though he reined in the worst of the Jewish oligarchs, many Jewish oligarchs were allowed to keep their vast wealth(though ill-gotten) and privileges. Also, Putin made a special effort to protect the Jewish community in Russia, not least by enforcing laws that forbade ‘antisemitism’. Indeed, even ‘liberal’ Jews in Russia, for all their anti-Putin hatred, admitted that Jews in Russia were left alone to do whatever and pursue any endeavor(unless it was spreading globo-homo propaganda to the young ones or desecrating churches with ‘Pussy Riot’ antics).

Given such pro-Jewish measures on the part of Putin’s government, one would think most Jews around the world would have made peace with Russia. Many of the richest people in Russia are Jews. Jews are protected and lead affluent lives and have many opportunities. Putin’s government denounces ‘antisemitism’ and goes hard against anyone who dares to threaten or attack Jews. This Being-Nice-to-Jews approach is especially remarkable given that many of the most ruthless Bolsheviks were Jews(who went about attacking Russia’s Christian heritage) and many of the greediest gangster-capitalists were Jews(whose supposed ‘shock therapy’ stripped the Russian economy of its assets). To this day, Jews go on and on about how the Nazis confiscated Jewish property, but in fact, Jews stole a lot more from the Russian nation.

Even so, Russia hoped for a compromise and reciprocity between itself and World Jewry. Alexander Solzhenitsyn even wrote a book about Russians and Jews, whereby he called upon both groups to admit to their past wrongs and arrive at mutual understanding. But no matter what the Russian government has done for the Jews in Russia, Israel, and elsewhere, there’s been zero reciprocity from the Jewish Side. As far as most Jews are concerned, the blame was always and entirely with the Russians, whereas the Jews were totally blameless. So, it doesn’t matter if Putin and Russia want to make amends and meet the Jews halfway. No, it must be the Jewish Way all the way, and Russia better just bow down and do as told.

Now, let’s consider the fate of nations and peoples who have totally submitted to all the Jewish demands. Jews make a big deal of Winston Churchill, the British Lion who stood up to the Evil Nazis. Unlike most Europeans who either allied with, surrendered to, or collaborated with the Nazis, the British people refused to appease evil and fought for freedom, or so says the Good War Narrative.

Given this factoid of 20th century British History, one would think that Jewish Power would have done everything to preserve and protect what made Great Britain a special civilization. Indeed, it’s hard to think of a people more cucked to Jewish Power than the British Anglos who support the Jews/Zionists in all their endeavors, like the Ukraine War(or more like the Judeo-Russian War), the recent destruction of Syria, the endless massacres of the Palestinians, and the plan to destroy Iran.

Yet, Jewish Power has done everything to insult, mock, and humiliate the White Britons. Over the years, Jewish Power did everything to push White Nakba or the Great Replacement on Britain. Jews run BBC and cast blacks in historical British/European roles. Even as British Anglos go out of their way to protect Jewish identity, culture, and feelings, British Jews return the favor by degrading and despoiling Historic Britain. Anglos decry as ‘Anti-Semitic’ anything that might offend Jewish sensibilities while Jews exult in Anti-White hatred and Anti-Anglo insults. British Anglos pledge to defend Israel as a Jewish State while Jews in Britain are hell-bent on pushing the agenda of the Afro-Colonization-of-White-Wombs. Negrolatry and GloboHomo, both heavily funded by World Jewry, have become the new cult religions of the Anglos who’ve totally cucked their bodies and souls to the Jews.

What does that tell us? National Socialist Germans were anti-Jewish, and we can understand why the Jews were anti-German. But Iran and Russia aren’t Anti-Jewish, but Jews foam at the mouths with anti-Iranian and anti-Russian hatred. As for the British Anglos, they’ve totally submitted to Jewish Power, but the Jews still go about eviscerating the heart and soul of Historic Britain. It’s like DAMNED IF YOU DO, DAMNED IF YOU DON’T. Jews say that the US didn’t do enough during World War II to stop the Holocaust. Now, Jews complain that the US isn’t doing enough to facilitate the genocide in Gaza.

 Video Link

Video Link

And of course, look at the U.S., perhaps the only country in the world that is more cucked to Jewish Power than the U.K. is. American Politics is a pissing contest of who can suck more semen from Netanyahu’s cock.
Jews have repeatedly said that, after all their troubles in the Old World, they found something like paradise in the U.S. There were no pogroms like in the Pale of Settlement. No forced conversions like in Spain. And of course, nothing like the Holocaust. Given the levels of Jewish success in the U.S.(that was envisioned and built mostly by Anglo-Americans and other white Americans), one would think Jews would have shown gratitude and done everything to maintain the very America that allowed for Jewish freedoms and success.

But, what has Jewish influence wrought on the US? Jews, who still bitch about the Kristallnacht, funded and encouraged mob violence that created a thousand Kristallnachts in 2020 in wake of George Floyd’s death from drug overdose. And given that white cops made ‘blue’ Democratic-dominated cities livable again after the crime epidemic of the Sixties and the Seventies, you’d think these mostly Democratic Jews would lend moral support to the police. Instead, the Jews threw the cops to the wolves of BLM, Antifa, and other ‘woke’ morons just for political expediency: “Hey blacks, Trump’s America is ‘racist’ and killing innocent black men, so go and vote Democratic!”

Via support of mass immigration, Jewish-Americans replaced whites with nonwhites. Via promotion of degenerate GloboHomo as an official cult, Jewish-Americans have replaced Christianity(and natural norms) with Queertianity(and the ‘new normal’). Via sacralization of the Negro, Jewish-Americans have justified endless black-on-white violence, with whites always being the ones to blame. Via Zionist lunacy, Jewish-Americans have gotten the US embroiled in more pointless wars that ended up killing millions and derailing global peace that might have been with the end of the Cold War.

So, what conclusion are we to draw from these manifestations of Jewish Power? Nazi Germany hated the Jews, Russian and Iran sought understanding with the Jews, and the US/UK totally cucked to the Jews. But, Jews have targeted all of them for destruction. A rational person would say the real problem is primarily with the Jews themselves. It reminds me of the Jewish joke about the chimney. No answer can satisfy the question.

https://kolaleph.org/2013/01/16/the-rabbi-is-in-two-men-come-down-the-same-chimney/

Putin sucking up to Netanyahu. Some good it for Russia in lessening Jewish Supremacist hostility.

Foulism: Foul Play Replaces Fair Play, Re-Moralization Follows Demoralization, and the True Failure of the Imagination

 One can be biased but still be committed to fair play, but that isn't the Current West committed to Foulism in service to Zion.

Video Link

Call it tribalism, ethnocentrism, nationalism, or whatever. It’s natural for a people to prefer and favor their own side. Any people who fail to do so either out of stupidity, decadence, complacency, apathy, or persuasion(by the enemy/rival/competitor-posing-as-friend) will fade from history. That is absolutely guaranteed.

However, to make my-side-ism work within the context of larger humanity, there has to be some ground rules. All people must acknowledge the validity of nationalism(or its variants) for all groups. If People A are primarily for People A, they must expect People B to be for People B, People C to be for People C, and so on.
If, however, People A favor their own side but deny the right of other peoples to do likewise, the core contract has been violated. It would certainly be presumptuous for People A to favor themselves while demanding all other peoples to favor People A as well. That goes beyond tribalism. It smacks of tribal supremacism(or monomania) where one Tribe insists on its own sovereignty while denying the same right to all the others. Such reeks of hegemony, the stuff of empire.

Sane and sound universal nationalism respects the national identities and interests of all peoples, with the full understanding that what may be good for one nation may not be so for others. Thus, there is a need for negotiation and compromise built on mutual respect and give-and-take.

Indeed, such is the very essence of athletics. While any given side understandably cheers for its own team, it’s within the framework of rules that equally govern all sides. All sides must pledge to play fair and all sides must agree to penalties upon fouls being committed. Otherwise, it’s no longer about sportsmanship but barbarism.
Therefore, all decent sports fans, despite their passionate loyalty, would not condone their team winning dirty. A fair loss is more honorable than a foul win. Of course, some fans are so petty, lowdown, and unscrupulous that they don’t mind their team winning by any means necessary, even if it entails the use of banned substances, bribing the referees, and etc.
But among the civilized, even fans who root for their own team are for fair play and penalties upon fouls committed. Thus, you have healthy tribalism but not tribal supremacism. You root for your side but understand why others root for their own sides. While there are winners and losers, fans of all stripes feel as participants of the Good Game, one where the immutable champion is the principle of fair play. So, while one team may win the trophy for this season while another team may win the trophy for the next season, the one constant is that all must submit to the rules of the game. Thereby, even the losing side can walk away with dignity and with respect for the winning side(deemed to have won fair and square, rightfully earned).

No wonder gangsterism is despised(or at least was). It has no use for rules. When several companies compete under the rule of law, they strive to offer better products or services to edge out the competition. But suppose an inferior company gains dominance through gangsterism, bumping off executives, researchers, and managers of other companies. It has won by foulness, not fairness. Enterprisers create and produce stuff, whereas gangsters take what others have made.

When fouls aren’t called out by the legal arm of the system(as referee), fair play falls by the wayside, and then everything becomes degraded or begins to fall apart. Why should anyone play fair when foulness isn’t only tolerated but rewarded? It paves the way for eventual collapse of the system, implosion from within or invasion from without.

Granted, the decline of the West is rather paradoxical given the strange dynamic between the Northern Whites(or Europeans and White Americans of Northern European and mostly Protestant extraction) and the Jews. While no system is devoid of foulness, the Northern Whites nevertheless created social, political, and economic orders that were more conducive to the Rule of Law and Fair Play. Then, why did the fairest and most legal-bound system in the world become so vulnerable to Jewish corruption?
Because the meritocracy provided an opportunity for the Jews(accepted as fellow whites) to out-compete and gain advantage over the Northern Whites. Now, this factor alone needn’t have led to gangsterism if Jews were committed to meritocracy themselves.
After all, it made good sense for Jews to appreciate, defend, and preserve meritocracy given that their higher IQ and willpower favored them in brainy competition(for wealth, privilege, and power).

But for whatever reasons, Jews lacked an honor culture, held extreme tribal-supremacist views, harbored contempt toward goyim, were boundless in their ambition, and were given to endless cycles of self-pity, paranoia, and revenge. Long having honed their skills as ‘parasitic’ sidekicks in the shadows than as leaders in open contention, Jews failed to develop the sense of honor so essential to dignified rule.

Thus, even though they gained wealth and power via genuine meritocracy, they used their newfound advantages to secure and expand their power with little regard for rules. Had Jews committed themselves to the Rule of Law as established by Northern Whites, the result might have been a happy story for all. But Jews, who’d gained so much through fair play(or meritocracy), weren’t averse to using the foulest means to grab more and more until the entire world became their (g)oyster. One really wonders what the likes of Alan Dershowitz had in mind when they studied law at Harvard. To uphold the law for all peoples or to turn it into lawfare for Jewish supremacist gangsterism.

The strangely perverse thing about Jews is that their example violated the stereotypical formula about success and failure, the presumption being that the smart, talented, and capable favor meritocracy because they don’t need to cheat to succeed as they possess natural talent and the competitive spirit. In contrast, the dumb, the incompetent, and/or the lazy tend to resort to foul means as they lack the requisite abilities to make it through honest effort and fair play.
In some cases, certain groups very likely possess more innate talents than other groups, e.g. Whites and East Asians have higher IQs than blacks. In other cases, the national character of a people may place a premium on the prestige of integrity and conscience, whereas the national character of another people may foster a more cynical, cunning, and corrupt worldview. People of Southern Italian stock were more prone to corruption and criminality in the US. Now, one might not expect much from the not-too-bright ‘goombas’ for whom lying, cheating, and stealing come naturally, like with the scummy hoodlums in GOODFELLAS. That jibes with the formula of ethnic stereotypes: Southern Whites cannot out-compete the Northern Whites in fair competition, and so they cheat.

Video Link

But, Jews are a different matter, a real outlier. Not only have they demonstrated abilities(and awareness) equal to those of the Northern Whites but even some that proved to be superior. Thus, an objective onlooker might have expected the Jews to be even more fair-minded and conscientious once they gained the dominant position in society. But, the opposite turned out to be the case.
Jews earned like super-Episcopalians but acted like the ultra-Sicilians. Unlike the Meatball Italians(and the Dumb Polacks), Jews thrived in a meritocratic system, but they acted like termites devouring the system from within, leaving an empty husk that was only good for gangsterism. Granted, many people were blindsided. For one, because many Jews, especially the radical ones, were at the forefront of critiquing political injustices and exposing social ills(and leading revolutionary movements), many idealistic whites assumed that a Jewish-dominant order would be more fair-minded and progressive.
If so many Jews expressed such a zeal for ideals and intellect, wouldn’t the Jewish domination of the arts & letters, of media & academia, lead to a new golden age of fairness, justice, and morality? It especially seemed so as the final phase of Jewish Ascendancy coincided with the Boomer takeover of the levers of power, significant insofar as the Sixties generation became associated with idealism, expansion of rights, and various liberations. But then, the dark side of ‘liberation’-ism was the opening of the Pandora’s Box that led not only to positive and healthy freedoms but excessive, perverse, and shameless ones. Gordon Gekko’s “Greed Is Good” was just another variation of “Let It All Hang Loose.”

We may guess as to the reasons behind the Jewish penchant for corruption and gangsterism. There may be something like the Talmudic Jerk Ethic as a darker counterpart to the Protestant Work Ethic.
Also, Foul Play may be a feature of the superiority complex as of the inferiority complex. It may be that fair play is most likely among those with more-or-less equal talents and equal estimation. If groups A, B, and C all regard each other as more-or-less equally worthy, they are likely to play fairly amongst themselves.
However, if one group, say B, feels inferior, its members may feel they must cheat or make bogus excuses for special favors(like ‘affirmative action’) to gain something like parity in a competition for which they’re ill-suited.
But, the result may be the same if one group, say C, feels superior. If members of C believe, either by objective/meritocratic measurement or ethno-supremacist delusion(or both), that they are innately better than others, they may believe that they’re above the law or too good to concern themselves with the rules meant for the suckers, lamos, squares, and mediocrities, i.e. “the laws are for the birds.” It’s David Mamet’s vision of a house-of-games where the truly smart/talented outplay the rest who, unable to keep up, are deemed as losers deserving only of contempt, like the weary salesmen in GLENGARRY GLEN ROSS.

Video Link

The inferior feel that they must cheat to get ahead in life. The superior feel that they’re too good to play by the rules meant for the humdrum. Jews feel they have Big Brain superiority over the goyim and therefore aren’t bound by the same rules. They feel as prophetic-gangsters over the dogmatic-sheeple that constitute most of humanity. So, when Jews cheat and swindle the goyim, they don’t see it as foul play but as a different kind of fair play, i.e. it’s only natural, even cosmically ordained, for the smarter Jews to run circles around the dimwit goyim. It’s like how Hannibal Lecter the genius lives by his own rules and regards most people as inferior sheeple. Or consider Harry Lime in THE THIRD MAN.

Video Link

Video Link

Video Link

Whether it’s Jewish Supremacism(or “We are the masters of the universe”) or Lecter/Lime, there’s the veneer of a higher kind of morality where the rightful superior-being or the master race lords over the inferior. We don’t expect people to treat pigs, lambs, horses, cows, or dogs as their equal. Then, why should Hannibal Lecter or the Jews treat whom they regard as inferior beings as their equals? Thus, what is objectionable from a humanist viewpoint becomes ‘moral’(or transmoral) from a superiorist view, be it based on Scripture(with Jews as the Chosen) or HBD(with Jews as the genius race).

Thus, while it would be immoral for most people to do genocide on the Palestinians, it could be deemed as ‘transmoral’ or ‘ubermoral’ for the Jews to do so because they’re either the Chosen(with the right to wipe out the ‘Amalek’) or the Genius Race(in relation to whom the Palestinians are like cattle to slaughter or, at best, like savages to exterminate to make way for civilization).
Granted, the current West is rather schizophrenic because, even as Jewish power and privilege are founded on an ideology/idolatry of innate superiority(spiritual and/or intellectual), Jews have long staked their reputation as the champions of equality(or equity) against ‘racism’ and also as the greatest victims of racial supremacism(of Nazi Germany). No wonder then there are so many Philo-Semitic whites who are utterly smitten with Jews as the superior race, the Chosen by God and gifted with genius DNA, and making excuses for the worst excesses of Zionism as an ethno-supremacist ideology, while, at the same time, making Jews out to be hapless victims of supremacist ‘Anti-Semites’ and ‘Islamofascists’. “We must protect Jews from goy supremacists because they are the true supreme race.”

But it’s wrong to only blame Jewish supremacism. If it’s wrong for a people to act supremacist, it is equally wrong for a people to act submissivist. Suppose there’s Bill & Bob, and Bill always feels entitled to everything while Bob willingly acts the toady and flunky to Bill. Bill has the master attitude and Bob has the slave attitude. Now, if Bill had forced Bob into bondage, Bob would be a victim, therefore undeserving of blame. But if Bob of his own volition chose to be a suck-ass devotee to Bill’s arrogance and nastiness, he too must be blamed for not living up to his human potential for dignity/decency and for indulging Bill’s worst tendencies. The greatest evil in our world is the partnership between Jewish Supremacism and White Submissivism. Whites have reneged on their obligations as rational, critical, and free-thinking individuals and abnegated their agency to the Jews as their masters. Whites did this freely and have thus demonstrated the evils of submissivism as the flipside of supremacism.

One of the strangest phenomena in the West might be called ‘re-moralization’ to compensate for the inevitable demoralization that accompanies the rise of foulness. When the rules of fair play lose ground to the abuses of foul play, the natural result is the demoralization of society, even among decent folks who ideally want to play by the rules. More and more people ask, “Why should I play fair when the foulest ones are allowed to get away with murder?” Thus, there’s increased temptation for everyone to cheat and steal as well, leading to social degradation, even collapse. Such a scenario isn’t good for the ruling elites who rely on order and stability to keep their power and privilege.

Imagine a kindergarten where the children are all expected to play by the rules except for one, Bobby. What all the other kids are reprimanded for, Bobby is spared. While all the other kids get one cookie and a glass of milk, Bobby gets a whole box of cookies and all the milk he wants. While all the other kids are made to obey the teacher, Bobby can do as he pleases at any time of the day. Naturally, the other kids will become demoralized and lose respect for authority. What’s the point of obeying the rules that apply to them but not to Bobby?

But suppose the authorities at the kindergarten ‘re-moralize’ the situation with a concerted effort to persuade the children that it is indeed totally moral for Bobby to receive special treatment. You see, Bobby is somehow different and deserves extra care and attention. He’s especially bright, a genius kid, and therefore must be allowed to explore and find his own ways. He’s also especially fragile, a victim of some illness, and therefore deserving of special sympathy by the other students. Therefore, far from Bobby’s flouting of rules being an affront to morality, it is the most moral thing in the world because Bobby is so very special, so different from the others. Thus, what might have resulted in demoralization of the kids is spun into a ‘re-moralization’ whereby they adhere to the rules on grounds that nothing is nobler in life than making oh-so-special Bobby happy.

Something like that seems to have happened in the West with the Jews. Jewish exceptionalism is a sure recipe for demoralization of the entire society as many people are apt to ask, “Why should we play by the rules when the foulest Jews seem to gain all the wealth, power, privilege, and honors?” But Jewish Specialness is always ‘re-moralized’ as totally justified, most-deserving, the most natural thing in the world(given higher Jewish intelligence & drive), a spiritual imperative, historically redemptive, and/or downright karmic(or “those who bless ‘Israel’ will be blessed by God”, which in US politics comes down to “those who kiss Netanyahu’s ass will also get to suck his dick”).
Thus, an utterly corrupt state of affairs in the US(and the West) is inverted via ‘remoralization’ into the highest good. You see, Jews are ‘more equal than others’ on the basis of the laws of the universe, and it’s totally misguided, as well as ‘Anti-Semitic’, to believe otherwise.

Among the oft-heard rationales, the meritocratic one based on IQ and work ethic is the most sound, but surely Jewish wealth and power in the current West go far beyond what is deserved on the basis of talent. How much insider trading goes on within the Jewish network? How was it that Bernie Madoff got away with mass theft for so long? How and why were Jewish financiers able to cook up crazy stuff like the Dot.com bubble and the real estate bubble? And what kind of meritocracy is it when Wall Street is bailed out when its schemes go wrong? As for Israel, is it even viable without US support? How is it that the most zealous Zionists(who even support the horrors in Gaza) have open paths to success in all institutions while those who protest Israel atrocities are targeted for blacklisting? So much for colorblind meritocracy.

Also, some of the super-wealth of Jewish individuals(and goyim as well) is questionable. One wonders whether much of the wealth really goes to industrious people who use intelligence in constructive ways or to those people who’ve proven their intelligence but not much else, a kind of ‘mandarism’. In pre-modern China, the most power, prestige, and privileges went to those who demonstrated brain power but didn’t put it to much constructive use. It took real brain power to pass the Confucian ‘eight-legged essays’, but the main dynamic was to select for mental power, not to use it for anything useful like science, technology, and enterprise.
While surely plenty of people in the West(and all of the modern world) gain great wealth and success by using their intelligence in innovative and productive ways, it seems many take the ‘mandarin’ route. Just by going to elite schools and getting good grades, they are placed on pedestals where they gain tons of prizes by careerist osmosis. (How did the Clintons and Obamas become so rich?)
Just by rubbing shoulders with the right people in the right places, they rake in tons of wealth even though they themselves didn’t accomplish much. (Granted, even the not-so-smart may succeed along these lines, like Jared Kushner whose daddy made handsome donations to Harvard.)
But then, even those who do use their brains in constructive ways seem to make more money than makes sense. Think of all those instant-billionaires who made their vast fortunes by creating some dinky smartphone app, LOL.
One wonders if there’s some shenanigans going on, especially among Jews whereupon if some tribesmen exhibit a degree of intelligence and ingenuity, they are rewarded far beyond what is merited. Thus, what really should have earned them millions earns them billions, the whole strategy designed to create an elite bulwark community of like-minded Jewish Zionists. A kind of merito-excess or merito-ecstasy, which is another form of foulism. If someone bakes and sells pies worth $1,000 in profit but is given $1,000,000, there’s some funny stuff going on. Even deserving Jews seem to be rewarded far beyond what is merited, like Eddie Murphy disguised as a ‘white man’.

Video Link

Recent events have made the foulism at the heart of the West even more brazenly obvious. We shouldn’t fault the Jews for favoring their own identity and interests. But there are fair ways and foul ways to do so, as with sports. Surely, even a lifelong New York Yankees fan wants his team to win fair and square. Where’s the pride and dignity in victory by cheating? Rules-based order is of no use as a rules-debased order, especially if one side constantly invokes the rules while remaining immune from them.

Now, given certain racial, ethnic, spiritual, and/or historical reasons, one may well understand why the US favors the Jews-Zionists-Israel over the Arabs-Muslims-Iranians-etc., but there is still a fair way to practice this bias. Even as the US lends support to Israel, it must call out the fouls committed by Jews-Zionists-Israel. That way, the US can have its biases but also its honor, just like a sports fan can cheer for his team while insisting on fair play for all sides, including his own.
After all, even if you root for a certain boxer, would you want him to win by punching the opponent in the balls? Low blow is a low blow, a despicable act, and nothing justifies it. There’s a reason why Mike Tyson was disqualified after taking several bites on Evander Holyfield’s ear. Surely, even diehard Tyson fans understood that was the right call.

But, the American elites(and many ordinary folks as well) have not only resigned themselves to but totally embraced the foulism of Jews-Zionists-Israel as the New Normal, a moral imperative, and something to praise and celebrate. Apparently, Jews and Israel can never do wrong. All of its fouls are not only ‘fair play’ but awesome play. Jewish low-blows are always justified as ‘self-defense’.

This is all the more troubling as the US, especially with the end of the Cold War, appointed itself as the world’s policeman, the world’s judge, the world’s referee. Now, taking on such roles doesn’t negate the possibility of the US having certain biases, favorites, and leanings, but it should preclude the US from being blinded by them in world affairs. For example, the US may be diplomatically closer to Nation A than to Nation B, with which it has serious issues; but if Nation A were to attack Nation B, the US as world referee is obligated to condemn the transgression of Nation A, even if it’s deemed a friendly nation.
Otherwise, the US loses its credibility as the world’s policeman in favor of street-cred as a hoodlum-for-hire. This is why corrupt policemen and judges are more dangerous than any criminal. A criminal is simply a crook, a creature of the sewer. We don’t expect anything from a criminal but criminality, and we certainly don’t rely on him for security and justice. However, we do rely on institutions of the law for social stability and moral order; therefore, when they are gutted out with corruption, there is no recourse left for decent people.

Over time, it seems that Jewish Power has targeted and corrupted just about every institution in the West to serve the agendas of Jewish Supremacism. As Jews cannot achieve their grandiose objectives with fair play alone, they’ve spun the Jewish reliance on foulism as the highest principle of the West. Everything from academia to the media to legal institutions(as arms of Jewish Lawfare) to politics to entertainment to finance to Big Tech(Palantir anyone?) to NGO’s to various ‘international organizations’ have been re-molded to toe the Jewish Supremacist Zionist line.
Recently, it’s been suggested that IAEA(International Atomic Energy Agency) may have been co-opted by the Jewish-run West to gather information on Iranian scientists and sites for targeting by Israel. And during the Syrian War, investigation suggesting that the chemical attacks were false flag operations carried out by US-Israel-Turkey-backed Jihadis was suppressed. One by one, it seems Jewish Power has infiltrated just about every organization and institution of any influence in the world. Either they’re filled with Jews or total cuck to Jews. And even when goy elites appoint individuals to head such organizations, they are likely to be shabbos goyim. And this is no less true of the EU than of the US. Contrast the European elites’ reactions to George W. Bush’s proposed invasion of Iraq to the current elites’ reactions to Israel’s brazen attack(that combined elements of terrorism and assassination along with conventional war-making). They are pretending that Israel is ‘defending’ itself.
In the past, even corrupted institutions at least made a show of legality and due process to justify their nefarious agendas, like in the drive up to the Iraq War. And Israel at least pretended they cared about the two-state solution and international law. But now, the powers-that-be just do what they want, and the institutions that are supposed to serve as checks on the power just turn a blind eye or approve all the measures in a knee-jerk manner. The overall Western reaction to Israel’s most dastardly attack on Iran(followed by Trump’s deranged tweets and the bombings of Iran, the party was attacked by Israel) goes to show the rot is total. Instead of a compromised referee making some questionable calls to favor one side, it’s a totally crooked referee arm-choking one player so that the other can pummel him to the ground.

Children scream as they line up at a charity kitchen in Gaza in search of a minor meal
 Video Link

It seems that over the years Jews have been identifying and targeting for removal anyone in elite circles in the US, EU, Canada, and Australia who dared to defy the power of Zion. If Jews use literal assassination to take out people they don’t like in the Middle East and North Africa, they use character-and-career-assassination in the West. Politicians who don’t fully comply with Zionist demands are opposed by those groomed and well-funded by the Jewish Lobby. Across institutions, those with the slightest sign of unease with the Lobby are pushed to early retirement or denied promotion. And most goyim in elite circles remain silent out of fear of endangering their own career prospects and/or being labeled ‘Anti-Semitic’ or any of the smears cooked up by Jewish Power, such as “Putin’s Puppet”.

The Western bias in favor of Israel was always problematic in world affairs, but there once was a sense that there was a limit to what the Jewish Power could demand. Richard Nixon, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and Bill Clinton exhibited some brake power on Jewish supremacist acceleration. There was a time when people in government weren’t afraid to express outrage at the prospect of Jonathan Pollard not only being pardoned but sent back to Israel to flick a middle finger at America with beaming Netanyahu standing by his side. But such a time passed, and when Pollard was finally released, NO ONE dared to express outrage.
Imagine that, the biggest traitor in US history was given a hero’s welcome by Netanyahu in Israel, but 99% of US politicians would have us believe Israel is ‘our greatest ally’ and that Netanyahu is America’s best friend. What kind of sick joke is that?
It’s as if the entire West has become the 1919 World Series fixed by Arnold Rothstein, and moreover, one where no one has a problem with the fix. Remember kids, “Those who bless ‘Israel’ will be blessed by God.” Even if Jews were generally saintly, it’d be an iffy proposition. But it’s downright perverse when Jewish Power is totally gangsterist, supremacist, and genocidal.

Then, it’s somewhat fitting that the US has Donald Trump as president, or the gangsta-president, with MAGA having been utterly debased into MAGANGSTER-ism. Even though Trump gained traction back in 2016 as a champion of nationalism(contra globalism) and America First(instead of endless foreign wars), something didn’t jibe well. Could a man whose entire career was one of dealing with gangsters, literal and figurative, be trusted to be a true patriot, a man of integrity, and a statesman? In retrospect, the answer should have been obvious as day, but the political landscape became so utterly phony and corrupt that enough Americans were willing to take a chance with the ‘maverick’ candidate. But his swagger is that of a gangster, not a visionary, let alone a prophet.

Worse, he’s exploiting the very real vulnerabilities that Americans feel with false bravado and muscle-flexing. When people feel disempowered, two tendencies become manifest. One is positive, the desire to heal things, restore balance, and reestablish a semblance of truth, meaning, and justice.
The other is negative, the temptation for self-righteous outrage or blind & destructive vengeful acts on the world.

Among the ‘leftist’ and ‘woke-tard’ types, especially in the build-up to 2020, the scapegoat was ‘systemic racism’, ensuing in an inquisition in which cities were ransacked and burned down to avenge St. George Floyd. Of course, such misdiagnoses only made things worse as the real problems went unaddressed.
Among ‘rightist’ and ‘MAGA-tard’ types who feel disoriented by globalism and its discontents, there’s the dangerous tendency of their rightful anger being misdirected at some foreign or ‘alien’ enemy, almost always chosen by the Jews. Thus, even though Zionist Neocon foreign policy has done much to drain the US coffers, the pseudo-patriotic saber-rattling(that may lead to new foreign entanglements) is offered as red-meat for making Americans feel ‘proud and strong’ again. MAGA-tards so often confuse style for substance, not realizing that the red-white-and-blue style really goes to serve the Star-of-David substance. Bait-and-switch, something Jewish Power is most expert at.

 Video Link

Even though Jews regarded Trump as dangerous for having revived the slogan ‘America First’ and having awakened white political consciousness, even if only implicitly, many seem to have come around to valuing his utility. Instead of suppressing American Nationalism/Patriotism in favor of Zionist-globalism, why not conflate the two, whereby MAGA-tards are persuaded that there is nothing more red-white-and-blue, gungho, and pro-common-man than Amerisrael First? After all, there is Mr. MAGA himself, the Orange Man, telling the world that Netanyahu and he are joined at the hip and always working in coordination. Of late, MAGA-tards are gushing that Trump’s bombing of Iran was like something out of TOP GUN: MAVERICK.

One thing for sure, the foulness of Jewish Power knows no bounds. Following 9/11, an official remarked that the lack of preparedness was due to the ‘failure of imagination’, i.e. how could anyone have predicted or imagined that ragtag Muslim terrorists would dream up and execute such an outlandishly elaborate plot involving passenger airplanes directed at the Twin Towers, the Pentagon, and who-knows-what-else. But have Muslims ever shown an aptitude for such a complicated operation? In its ‘imagination’ and scope, it has all the fingerprints of a Zionist/Mossad operation.
Thus, the real failure-of-imagination, which goes on to this day, is the inability and/or unwillingness of too many peoples and nations to grasp that Jews think differently. Most people still assume, “Sure, lots of crazy things are possible, but no one would ever dare.” Well, Jews got the chutzpah. It’s like Ron Jeremy sucking his own dick. Jews would not be Jews if not for their crazy imagination that there is this One God and He chose the Jews as His People. A people who can imagine such can imagine anything, and it is our failure of imagination that so many of us still think Jewish Power has a sense of limitations. It is capable of anything, like when Michael Corleone in THE GODFATHER PART II says, “Nothing’s impossible… If anything in this life is certain, if history has taught us anything, it’s that you can kill anyone.”

Video Link

Apparently, even Iran, which had been targeted so often by Israelis/Zionists in countless acts of terrorism and assassinations, failed to imagine that Israel would dare pull off something as outrageous as 6/13(and get away with it). Another epic failure-of-imagination. And who would have thought that the US and EU would both stand by Israel in its total act of perfidy?
The total cuck-ization of the West also resulted from the failure-of-imagination. Many assumed that once Jews gained sufficient wealth, power, and influence, they’d be satisfied and get along with others, like many other successful groups have done. Instead, Jews used their power to gain total power, used their wealth to grab all the wealth, used their controls to gain absolute control.

Video Link

The end-result has been the total and absolute takeover of the West by Jewish supremacist gangsters. Whites, in their failure-of-imagination, failed to foresee and understand the true agenda of the Jews. As such, bit by bit, all the white elites got swallowed by the Jewish Power Complex. The dynamic isn’t much different from that of Jim-Jonestown, with the Jewish Supremacist Death Cult hanging over the world. Who would have thought the Jews would have gone THAT FAR in Gaza? Who would have thought the West, despite its Israeli bias, would not only look the other way but lend full support to the genocide? Who would have thought the West would have been perfectly fine with Israel’s routine targeting of civilian areas in Gaza, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran? Jewish Power is like the kid in RUSHMORE. Obsessive, (passive)aggressive, and ‘with no reverse gear’(as has often been said on The Duran). Unless goyim muster the ‘imagination’ to understand this nature of Jewish Power, Jewish madness will keep pushing, just like Jim Jones did at Guyana. Perfidy is Zion’s name.

Video Link

But, even now, too many people fear the smear of ‘antisemitism’ if they were to suspect and expound on the Jewish Madness, which is even harder to appease than Adolf Hitler. Jewish Power routinely imagines and dares to be Suprema-Semitic and feels entitled to total hegemony, even if it means pushing the world to the brink.

If Jews can and do imagine such things, goyim must counter-imagine what Zion is capable of. And if the cases of Palestine, Iraq, Libya, Lebanon, Syria, and Iran are any lesson, it’s that the Zionists are utterly lacking in conscience and remorse in their drive to total power, just like Himmler’s Nazi SS.
Take the pager attack on Lebanon, for example. The problem was not so much the idea that the Jews could do such a thing but that they would do them at all. In other words, the idea was so beyond the pale(even if doable) that it wouldn’t be done. But it was done.
Likewise, surely Iran knew of Zionist sleeper cells in Iran and the various terrorist attacks and assassinations. Iran knew of the long history of Zionist perfidy, but there was a failure-of-imagination in how far the Zionists were willing to go. Iran learned there are no limits to Jewish Madness, none whatsoever.

But then, this is the people who bombed the King David Hotel and killed the Brits who’d been instrumental in, to a great extent, making the Zionist project possible. The Brits thought they could arrive at some halfway compromise between the Jews and the Palestinians, but as things turned out, Jews wanted everything, even to the point of targeting the British themselves. Talk about blowback.
Jewish Power is like Barbara Streisand in her stalking of Ryan O’Neal’s character in WHAT’S UP DOC? It has to be her way even if everything goes to hell. This Jewish personality trait has been made somewhat endearing in comedies(like in the Peter Bogdanovich movie), but it isn’t funny at all when it plays out in the real world, with Streisand-like Jews pushing O’Neal-like white cucks.

Video Link

In all this, what has become of the Anglo brand? While plenty of people around the world were aware of the notion of the Perfidious Albion, the Anglosphere did gain a good measure of admiration, respect, and trust around the world. Indeed, the fact that Anglos were uneasy when their hypocrisy was exposed implied a degree of conscience. (In contrast, Jews seem utterly shameless and proud of their hypocrisies on the basis that, being superior and/or aggrieved, they can make up their own rules at all times.) So, even though Anglos were hardly regarded as honest brokers, they were seen as a people whose words and handshake meant something. And when the European empires began to fall, the retreat of the British was deemed far more honorable and peaceable than the French with their horrendous conflict zones in Vietnam and Algeria. And in time, former colonies of the British Empire developed good relations with the British nation, and certain aspects of the imperial legacy were deemed as beneficial. And Anglo-American elites were regarded in much the same way.

But that’s all gone. In order for Anglos to maintain good standing in the world, they needed to be proud, confident, and resolute, people with spine. But once Anglos lost their way and caved to Jews as the new elites of Anglosphere, they incrementally and then dramatically turned into a bunch of white lapdogs of the Jewish Supremacist gangsters.
Today, people like Lindsey Graham and Keir Starmer represent an Anglosphere that is utterly cucked and sheepish in its servility to Zion. Thus, an Anglosphere that once used to temper, restrain, and even punish Jewish excesses now only exists to appease and indulge the absolute worst impulses of Jewish Supremacism. Jewish Supremacist foulness has befouled everything it has touched in conquest and control.

Anglos, once associated with Fair Play(at least as an ideal or principle), are now nothing but enablers of Jewish supremacist foulness. Israel does a surprise terrorist-attack on Iran, and the Anglos of the ‘rules-based order’ call foul on Iran, which besides has no nukes while Israel has hundreds made with technology stolen from the US. And just when Israel is engaged in genocide, your typical Anglo cuck in the US and UK hisses about fake ‘genocides’ in Iran. It’s about time Anglos erected a monument to Arnold Rothstein as the symbol of the new normal in Western Values. Why not when a rogue state that considers Jonathan Pollard as one of its noblest heroes is hailed as the greatest ally of the US?

There’s all this talk of Regime Change, especially in the Middle East and North Africa(and Ukraine), but the biggest Jewish coup in this regard was the total regime-change in the Collective West, indeed to the point where Anglos and Northern Whites went from a strong, confident, and proud race to the most pathetic, servile, and groveling bunch of cucks in the world, or blanka hundos doing the bidding of their Zionist Masters.

Video Link