The Irish Conundrum, or When Nationalism Is Globalized Into Suicidal Inanity

 

Given ways things are going, Ireland is over, no less than Great Britain is. The demographic trends are dire, made all the worse by the Irish ruling elites, intellectual class, and the educated middle class lending their moral support to what is effectively White Nakba and using threats and coercion to discourage any authentic nationalist reawakening and resistance against the demise of the Irish as a people, culture, and territory.

For the longest time, Irish pride of identity derived in large part from the resistance to British Imperialism, but it was a narrative with caveats. Not only did the Irish adopt much of British culture, values, and attitudes but they were genetically indistinguishable from the Britons. In time, English became the language of the Irish, and furthermore, it’s hard to think of another people who were bigger beneficiaries of the empire, other than the British themselves of course.
Indeed, one could argue that the Irish came to greatness through the British Empire, directly and indirectly. Not only did countless Irish join in the imperialist ventures and gain political/economic advantages but they benefited immensely from the mass immigration to the United States that, despite its independence from the empire, was a British creation and, in time, the closest ally of the Anglo Empire. (Granted, one could argue that black Africans were even bigger beneficiaries of the empire because contact with the White Man transformed them from jungle primitives and savanna bunnies to citizens, and ultimately sacred cows, of the richest and most powerful country on Earth, the United States. Afro-Anglo interaction made the real difference as blacks in Latin America gained far less.)

So, even though official Irish historiography propped up the image of the plucky underdog Irish standing up to British tyranny, no less true was the fact of tremendous Irish gains under the empire(and its creations).
This has led to a certain schizophrenia in the political mindset of the Irish. Are they blood-brothers with the British who recruited the Irish(as their closest racial cousins) in the imperialist ventures or are they soul-brothers with all the peoples, especially nonwhites, who stood up to ‘racist’ British Imperialism and other forms of Western domination?

It was further complicated because the Irish, due to their lower status in the British hierarchy, were often assigned the dirtier work that led to resentments and prejudices(to both uppers and lowers). Indeed, the haughty British often admonished the Irish for being overly crude and bigoted towards the imperial subjects while they themselves affected magnanimous postures. The master hires the overseer to whip the slaves but then lectures the overseer not to be so brutal. It’s like Jews using white goy cucks to destroy Muslim countries and Arab lives but then pontificating about ‘Islamophobia’.
Often finding themselves closer to the imperial subjects in the British colonies, the Irish had fewer illusions about the ‘wogs’ and ‘niggers’. But in constantly being given the dirty work, they also grew to resent the British. (And during World War II, the anti-British feelings led to Irish neutrality, which could be spun today as “letting the Nazis kill all those poor innocent Jews.”)

The ethno-dynamic was somewhat similar in the US, despite its independence from the British Empire. The ruling class was mainly composed of Protestant Anglo-Americans while Irish Catholics were lower in class hierarchy. Thus, the Irish came in closer and more troubled contacts with other ethnic groups(such as Jews, Italians, and Polacks) and the blacks. Even though the Anglo-American elites established the socio-economic order, they often talked down to the Irish and other lower-class types as being bigoted in their inter-ethnic relations and racial attitudes. In the film RAGTIME(directed by Milos Forman based on the E.L. Doctorow novel), the tormentor of the fancy Negro looks like a typical drunken Irish-American.

Video Link

So, over time, the Irish were both more likely to growl about “those damn niggers” AND more likely to identify with groups perceived as exploited or tyrannized by the British or the Anglo-Americans.
Not surprisingly, the Irish who turned out to be least prejudicial were in Ireland itself, which was once virtually all Irish and white. If the Irish in the US and various parts of the British Empire at least had an eye-opening first-hand encounters with the ‘natives’ or nonwhites, the Irish in Ireland increasingly came to rely on the Jewish, Liberal, and/or Leftist-dominated media and academia for their worldview.

When Ireland had been fixated on the national obsession for independence and reunion with Northern Ireland, the larger world didn’t matter so much. Also, being one of the poorer nations in Europe with a healthy birth rate, the priority of the Irish was to improve their own lives, not to play the role of the saviors of the world. In this period, the politics of resistance was mostly nationalist, even though some Irish caught the revolutionary bug and conflated the Irish struggle with international movements against imperialism, even participating in rebellions or revolutions in other countries.

At some point, gradually and then suddenly, the mythos of Irish resistance took on a globalist color. It was less about the Irish resisting the empire to restore and secure Irish nationhood than about the Irish joining in(and even leading) the world community or movement against ‘racism’, ‘colonialism’, ‘white supremacism’, ‘apartheid’, and so on. Thus, Ireland as a national entity in and of itself came to matter less as too tribal and petty. The elements of the national struggle were extracted and formulated into a global crusade. It encompassed the entire world, and the Irish were now part of this ‘universal’ movement, and so, it no longer mattered if Ireland was preserved as a nation or culture or land. All that mattered was that the Irish be on the side of the Global Good against the Global Bad. So, if masses of nonwhites arrived in Ireland and became the ‘New Irish’, what did it matter as long as it cemented Ireland’s position as a ‘progressive’ vanguard in the world?

Partly, this owed to the change in the political landscape following World War II, especially in the US, the dominant superpower to emerge(and relatively unscathed) from the ash heap of mid-century. Not only did the US media come to dominate the Free World but the US had a huge contingent of people of Irish stock, indeed even more than Ireland itself.
The predominant political narrative of post-war America comprised the Negro Problem, the Civil Rights Movement, the evils of ‘racism’, the commanding oratory of Negroes like MLK, and the magic of black popular music(even as a liberating agent for uptight whites with frozen souls).

If the Irish in America at least had to contend with the black problem first hand in the forms of street crime, school violence, and workplace pathologies, the Irish in Ireland received a filtered reality via the Liberal/Jewish media that presented the problem as wholly one of white ‘racism’ and black ‘victimhood’ and ‘resistance’, i.e. it was the KKK versus MLK, when it was often the case of whiskey-swilling-potato-munchers being terrorized by fried-chicken-watermelon-devouring neo-savages. For the Irish in Ireland, the race problem was so far removed from their immediate lives that they could afford the luxury of their own illusions.
For example, if white Americans got both the fun and fright from black-dominated boxing where black pugilists routinely beat up white boxers(that mirrored racial violence in real-life), the Irish and most Europeans of the period tended to interpret black victories in sports as merely a kind of social-racial justice, an expression of black pride, with which they could sympathize given the history of Western Domination over Africa. Also, given the post-war European inferiority complex vis-a-vis the rich and powerful US, the Black Issue was the one area on which Europeans could glibly feel morally superior toward the Americans. “We might have brought about World War I, World War II, the Holocaust, Fascism, Communism, but at least we didn’t have Jim Crow laws in Europe.”

The Irish also fancied themselves as a soulful and musical people, especially in contrast to the uptight and repressed British, even though, ironically enough, Great Britain and Ireland witnessed explosive successes in pop music around the same time inspired by heavily black-inflected American Rock n Roll and Rhythm n Blues. Some Irish even got to thinking that blues and soul music was a kind of black ‘Irish’ music, and there was probably a kernel of truth to this in that American Southern music had roots in the Irish and Scotch-Irish tradition. After all, something like the blues didn’t develop in Latin America or in Africa itself. In the American South, a Negro might have observed some sourpuss Irish bitterly drinking and cussing the night away and mimicked the style in his own manner: “Why massuh done make me pick all dem cotton and shit?”

The Irish conceit assured itself that, whereas the cold-hearted Britons were thawed by the Afro-American soul, the Irish merely connected with their soul-brothers, black counterparts of the soulful Irish.
In other words, if British Rockers were merely imitating or drawing inspiration from black music, the Irish were arriving at a singularity with their long-lost soul-cousins: “We Irish and them blacks, we know pain and suffering, we both have deep wounded souls, and etc. and through musical prowess, we’ve maintained our pride and dignity.”

Indeed, it’s telling that U2, the biggest Irish Rock Act, has done more to idolize and champion blacks than its own kind. Their songs about MLK and the Civil Rights Movement are more famous than anything written about the trials and tribulations of the Irish themselves. And, Bono basked in photo opportunities as a kind of Irish-Messiah standing tall among the black children of Africa, apparently dearer to him than the children of Ireland, that is unless Ireland is Africanized. Bono and others like him condemn any attempt to preserve the native racial and cultural roots of Ireland as their vision of the holy is shaped, disseminated, and enforced by anti-white Jews.

Ironically, the divisive internecine crisis of Northern Ireland once had a nationalizing impact on Irish politics. So much energy was invested in reincorporating Northern Ireland that less attention was diverted to global matters. Even though Sinn Fein and other radically-inclined Irish factions forged partnerships with ‘revolutionary’ groups all over the world, the main focus was on Ireland itself, about dealing with the pesky Protestant traitors who’d chosen to collaborate with the British refused to relinquish a vital piece of Ireland even long after the sun had set on the empire.

But once the Northern Ireland issue was more or less resolved, Irish politics drifted increasingly toward the global. The leftist-nationalist parties, in order to remain relevant and secure funding, gravitated to new issues. While the Irish had controlled the national narrative, the global narrative had been taken over by the Jews, and that meant the Irish seeking a place in the global order found themselves adopting the crypto-Jewish talking points on what constitutes ‘progress’.

Furthermore, there was a period of rapid economic growth with massive infusions of capital, as also happened in Poland in the aftermath of the Cold War, and this led to an emergence of a prosperous status-conscious cosmopolitan class, the main ambition of which was to be accepted into the EU club and be treated as one of the ‘equals’ among the advanced Western nations headed by the US. This meant adopting the attitudes and ‘values’ of the West, much like Spain had done since the death of Franco.

Even though Spain and Ireland found themselves, more often than not, at the opposite ends of the ideological spectrum through much of the 20th Century — Spain largely associated with rightist Franco and Ireland often associated with leftist or revolutionary sympathies — , the educated elites of both nations came to similar conclusions: Excessive investment in nationalism and reliance on Catholic authority had held society back, thus preventing a more meaningful participation in the Western community of nations.
Apparently, whether it was traditional rightism or classic leftism, Spain and Ireland had missed the boat of full prosperity and progress. No wonder then that Spain came fully onboard the EU ship, often trying to outdo other European nations in their ‘progressive’ credentials. Likewise, Ireland was the first European nation to adopt ‘gay marriage’ by majority electoral vote. And of course, there has been a total collapse of Catholic Church authority in both countries as the new messianism revolved around ‘sexual liberation’, GloboHomo, and Tolerance. Ironically however, the very forces that had undermined respect for the Church by exposing the sex scandals(involving minors) later came to champion the sexualization of children, thereby opening the door to future legitimization and legalization of pedophilia.

In a way, despite their conceits, the new elites of Spain and Ireland were little more than slickity hicks. Just like a country bumpkin in the city tries to overcompensate by out-slicking the city slicker, the newly minted globalist cosmopolitan classes in Spain and Ireland(along with their insufferable Polack equivalents) went out on a limb to show that they too are well-showered and perfumed in scent of ‘progress’. Such mindless eagerness to shed their hick odor was actually rather hick-ish as only a hick-at-heart would be so simple-minded and single-minded in his anxiety to win plaudits.
We see the same fixations among small town types who make it to a college town or the city. As if ashamed of their ‘humble’ origins, they go out of their way to prove that they are now part of the ‘edgy’ crowd. It also explains why the Southern Elites in the US are such useless and servile dogs, cheering along with the ‘woke’ crowd at the desecration of Southern heritage and history.

Nothing wrong with opening one’s mind to the world and appreciating wider horizons and bigger opportunities of urban life, but only a fool would blindly assume that something is truer or ‘more advanced’ simply because the urban elites happen to fancy it at the moment. Consider the Radical Chic of the Sixties and its delusions. Or the BLM mania of 2020, and the Jewish/white elites propping up Kendi X as a ‘great thinker’. Or, all the lies printed about race, sex, and world affairs in the pages of the New York Times.
Contrary to the narcissism of the educated class, much of elite thought is the product of indoctrination than intellect, taboos than thought, and consensus(& status) than contention.
The hysterical or ‘triggered’ reaction of the so-called educated elites to unorthodox ideas is ample proof that they fear honest discussion of controversial topics(most of which shouldn’t even be controversial in a society of open debate). In their lack of nerves, they prefer narratives, just like many families now rely on pre-cooked meals than bother to cook on their own with fresh ingredients. The idea is that we shouldn’t look at the ingredients that make up the narratives but just consume them as ‘healthy’ for us.

The Irish dilemma isn’t anything new. At various moments in history, the local, tribal, or national was amplified into the universal. Indeed, that was the beginning of Christianity. The tribal crisis of Jews under the Roman Empire spawned a new spirituality that reformulated elements of tribal Judaism into universal Christianity. If Jews insisted on the Old Testament as a tribal ethno-narrative, Christians(the early members of whom were all Jews) interpreted its events and happenings as preparations for the universal faith of Jesus the Messiah.

In the modern era, certain local or national events were mythologized to have larger meaning and repercussions, not least because most modern movements tended to be fueled by Enlightenment Ideas. Thus, the local events of the American Revolution or ‘1776’ came to reverberate far and wide, a shot heard around the world for liberty. The French Revolution soon became the template for the liberation of all of Europe. And, the Russian Revolution was promoted as epochal and global, its seismic energies meant to rearrange the power structures of the entire world. Even the Mexican Revolution had such an appeal, with non-Mexicans flocking there to take part, as also happened with the Spanish Civil War wherein the international brigades didn’t see it merely as a local Spanish affair but a war for all humanity. And many in the West have been made to feel that way about Ukraine: You see, it’s about ‘democracy’ and ‘Western values’(like celebrating homo-fecal penetration and fisting) against revanchist Russian autocracy and the ambitions of Putin as Putler, or New Hitler.

No doubt the Palestinian Struggle has similar implications around the world. Rather than regarding it as a conflict between Jews and Palestinians, many on the Left see it as a form of Anglo-Zionist neo-imperialism and the insatiable bloodlust of the war industries; and many on the Right see it as yet another manifestation of Jewish Supremacist madness to dominate the world, i.e. all the goyim of the world are figuratively ‘Palestinians’ endangered by Jewish Supremacist power and perfidy.
Palestinians themselves understand the global value of their struggle even though the Jews control rules of ‘globalism’. Thus, Palestinians must at once keep the struggle intensely national(ist), as their priority is to reclaim parts of what was once Palestine, and engage with the world community for sympathy and support. But the danger of globalizing or universalizing any local or tribal struggle is that its priorities may be altered, lose sight of the original objectives, and become subsumed into a generic agenda, much of which is at odds with nationalism. It certainly was the case when the Jewish struggle against the Roman Empire turned into Christianity that transcended all tribal loyalties. While your tribal folk may appeal to the world community for support, the world community may expect and even demand your folk to favor its generic global agenda over a ‘narrow’ nationalist one.

Ireland succumbed to the globalization of nationalism, whereby the New Irishness is defined not by Ireland-for-the-Irish and the preservation of Irish history & territory but by national purpose rendered into a universal abstract, one that could apply to just about anyone. In other words, anyone who speaks the words of ‘resistance’ and ‘decolonization’ may be deemed ‘spiritually Irish’ and welcomed to Ireland as its future citizens. Thus, Irishness is no longer about roots and continuum but about trends and fashions, more about attitude and posturing.

In a way, the spread of black music hastened this change in consciousness. If the Irish who imitate blacks see themselves as essentially or soulfully black, who’s to say anyone who adopts an abstract form of Irishness isn’t Irish? Just like Americanism is now shorn of roots and simply means anyone willing to adopt the latest fads in ‘American values’, Irishness is no longer about race, ethnicity, culture, and history but about ‘resistance’ and ‘revolution’, the themes of which are now dictated by the global academia/media that are controlled directly or indirectly by Jews.
Thus, Irishness is now indistinguishable from Britishness, German-ness, Spanishness, Swedishness, American-ness, Mexican-ness, and etc. that are all about the same set of idols and narratives: Judeo-Centrism, GloboHomo, and Negrolatry. The Irish may still be pugnacious in their peculiar way, but it’s more like ‘cucknacious’ as their current rages have been predetermined by others, especially the Jews, to ultimately destroy Ireland and turn it into yet another variation of Soros-Land.

It’s all a bit strange as the Irish, more than most Europeans, have been rather resistant to the Judeo-centric view of things, especially as their struggle had long been aligned with those of the Palestinians, black South Africans, and others at odds with the Anglo-Zionist Empire. Even to this day, the type of the Irish who are the most vocal supporters of the Jewish Supremacist globalist agenda may be heard mouthing slogans that are anti-Zionist and pro-Palestinian. In most Western countries, the goy-globalist elites are almost entirely pro-Zionist and prone to caricature the Palestinian struggle as little more than ‘Hamas Terrorism’, but the discourse is somewhat different in Ireland, even in high circles(though, to be sure, there are plenty of total cucks of Zion there as well). Perhaps, it’s just lip-service among most Irish political figures, as is the case among most Arab elites in the Middle East: All Talk, No Walk.
The political discussion is so often confused. When the Irish condemn the actions of the Zionists against the Palestinians, which side do they associate the Irish with? Are the Irish like the Palestinians, what with their own experience of victimhood under colonization and imperialist tyranny? Or do they feel that the Irish(or at least Irish Nationalists) are akin to the Zionists given their hostility toward the nonwhite newcomers? If Palestine was wiped off the map due to ceaseless Jewish immigration, might not the Irish meet the same fate as the result of mass immigration? Or the Irish being white, do the Irish feel that they too must atone for ‘white privilege’ and open their small nation to the Third World?

But even if sincere on the part of the Irish, it’s indicative of the devious mechanisms of Jewish Power that, when it cannot secure direct support outright, uses proxies to make the defiant entities support Jewish-controlled agendas nevertheless, thereby making them at least partly entangled and indebted to Jewish guidance and largesse.
It’s why GloboHomo has been so crucial to Jewish Power. By turning the Irish into a bunch of cucks to Sodomania, Jewish Power weakened Irish national power and unity, rendering them easier to manipulate at the global level. Besides, plenty of Irish surely drank the Kool-Aid that Jewish Israel is preferable to those ‘Muslims’ who don’t celebrate ‘Pride’, which is now more sacred and dear to the majority of the Irish than the Catholic Church ever was.

Jewish World Power Game, Marx-Brothers-Ism Uber Marxism, Jerry Springer as Cartoon Soros, and White Privilege Amidst 'Wokeness'

 

So much of what’s happening comes down to a matter of the Jews vs the World. Granted, plenty of Jews aren’t neo-satanist or crazy. Not all are powerful as there are plenty of righteous Jews who speak the truth or a portion of it. The late Stephen Cohen, Brother Nathanael, Norman Finkelstein, Glenn Greenwald, and etc. Alas, they lack power. Finkelstein was soon booted from a second-rank university, DePaul of Chicago, because of a JSP or Jewish Supremacist campaign spearheaded by the spiteful Alan Dershowitz. Jeffrey Sachs of late has become like Robert McNamara who eventually opened up about his role in the Vietnam fiasco.

Of course, the world would be rife with problems and challenges with or without Jews. Even if all Jews vanished into the air, conflicts and tensions would be everywhere. Consider the on-and-off battles between Armenians and Azerbaijanis. The raging drug wars in Mexico. The tensions between China and Vietnam or between China and Philippines(mostly over islands). India and Pakistan still eye one another as an existential enemy.

Still, Jewish Power has made things far worse by interfering all around the world. Instead of letting the locals come to terms of their own accord, Jewish Power has often worsened matters via its control of the US as the lone superpower. Would Syria, Libya, Ukraine, Iraq, and Afghanistan be in the state that they are in if not for Jewish Power? Would there be a ‘new cold war’ with Russia? Possibly but far less likely.

Without Jewish interference in global affairs, there would have been no coup in Ukraine and the bloodbath that followed. Syria would be in one piece. Assad is no saint, but what decent person would prefer Al-qaeda or ISIS? Jewish Supremacism prefers ANYONE(even sub-nazis in Ukraine) if it’s GOOD FOR THE JEWS, the cornerstone of Jewish political logic.

Now, every nation has its internal divisions, which could be ethnic, religious, ideological, or whatever. There are aggrieved factions or minorities in any society. Usually, they learn to get along as the best bet for peaceful co-existence.
However, when national order is destabilized and various groups are supplied with arms & materials, things can spiral out of control.
This dynamic is no less true of Israel. Suppose foreign powers undermined government authority and supplied a shitload of arms to Palestinians in both Israel proper and the West Bank. Things would go up in flames in street-to-street fighting, like in Syria.
The Yinon-ist divide-and-conquer strategy has been concocted by Jews for goy nations. So, Syria and Yemen were torn asunder. Jews simply don’t want those countries to be stable, secure, and close to Iran. So, any justification continues to be invoked to undermine them.

But then, a low-intensity Yinonist Plan has been devised for the West as well. Why do Jews push for mass-immigration and Diversity on goy nations(while never for Israel)? Because Jews know that more Goy Diversity means they can play the divide-and-rule game more effectively.
But then, even in relatively homogeneous nations, Jews encourage and exploit and play on ideological and idolatrous divisions to tear them apart. Poland is an example. Jews are masters of psychology and play on Polack Psychology. Poles are infected with Polish Disease of self-loathing Slavic Inferiority Complex. Poles seek to disassociate themselves from the Oriental Despotic Russians who are portrayed as crude and backward. They crave acceptance and approval as part of The West. They tirelessly bleat about how they’re CATHOLIC as opposed to Orthodox and how they use the Latin Alphabet and not the barbaric Cyrillic.

Poles once held prestige as empire builders but came to ruin and weakness. They got swallowed up by Russia and came to idealize the West. Jews analyzed the ‘Dumb Polack’ psychology and figured out a formula, which explains why so many young Poles are into Globo-Homo and Negrolatry. As Christianity has been replaced by Gay Rites and Jungle Fever in the West, young Poles abandon Catholicism and hoist the new banner of BLM with ‘rainbow’ colors. They go with whatever is ‘cool’ in America. Their modus operandi boils down to ‘West is cool and awesome, and Polish worth is a matter of Western approval.’
Now, such servility wasn’t so deleterious in the past when the West was undoubtedly more advanced than the East, i.e. Western Enlightenment over Russian Oriental Despotism. Also, there was a time when the West was more awesomely and magnificently race-ist than the East. Russia, with its polyglot empire, became somewhat mongrelized and confused in identity. In contrast, Western Europeans, especially of Central and Northern Europe, were more homogeneously white and proud.

But, what’s there to salvage in the Current West? Just about everything is about cuckery to Jews, Negroes, and Homos. The governing policy is Erase-ism or Erasism, or erasure of the native population. It’s about the Great Replacement or White Nakba. Incredibly, current Russia is whiter than many parts of Germany, France, Sweden, Netherlands, Belgium, and UK(which should stand for United Kolony than United Kingdom).
But the Polish Disease is impervious to reality. (Collaborationist)elite-dominated, it only hankers for approval from the West that still hogs the lion’s share of global prestige(albeit declining since the outbreak of the Ukraine War). The Polish Disease means that Poles lack an autonomous or independent way of gauging meaning and worth. All that matters is sucking up to the Prestigious West for approval.

Why does the West still hold so much prestige(and allure) when its popular culture is garbage, its borders are broken, its elites are cuck-maggots to Jewish supremacism, and its ‘civilizational’ expression is ‘twerking’? One reason is the power of hype. The West controls the media machine and advertising. It sprinkles glitter in the eyes of the globe. And the deracinated youths around the world are easily dazzled by the latest ‘cool’ fashions and fads doused in hedonism and vanity.

But, it’s also because the nationalist, Christian, and/or conservative forces are so dull, boring, or corrupt. Whatever the value of nationalism and spirituality, one doesn’t live on seriousness, morality, or eternity alone. People want sensory stimulation, especially in our modern era of electronica. Consider how people love the celebration of Christmas more than its deeper meaning. Its celebration has spread even to Japan, a nation where only 1% is Christian. Take the Beach Boys song, “Fun, Fun, Fun”. People feel that the Right wants to take the T-Bird away.
Of course, the Left took it away for sure under Marxism-Leninism, which is why capitalism won the ‘culture war’ against communism. Capitalism offered rides on the T-Bird.
Especially as Pop Culture prizes youth uber alles, shallowness has come to dominate social attitudes. And too often(and understandably so), ‘growing up’ is seen as synonymous with losing one’s idealism and coming to terms with the corrupt ways of the world. It’s one thing to mature and wise up to reality but quite another to join the system by selling out one’s soul. Despite gray areas, there is a difference between settling for compromise and sinking into corruption, and the West is headed for the latter(if not already fully there). Consider all those ‘experts’ in institutions and industries who, in the name of fighting disinformation, give us nothing but. A culture where to be grown-up means to be more measured in truth and principles would be welcome. Compromise doesn’t necessarily mean a surrender to things that one believes to be wrong. Rather, it means a willingness to deal with reality as it is in the hope that it can be reformed incrementally. In contrast, corruption is an abandonment of principles and acceptance of the rot. And that’s where the current system seems to be at, an Empire of Lies as Putin called it. One look at the likes of Mike Johnson, and you know the GOP is rotten to the core.

Of course, it’s no easy feat to root out corruption as any attempt will have to go up against the entire system, which means both parties and most institutions(like in MR. SMITH GOES TO WASHINGTON, except that reality doesn’t have a Hollywood Ending). Matters become even more hopeless when society in general has been corrupted at the level of citizenry(and even more hopeless yet when people have embraced the corruption as consecration, like with ‘gay marriage’, or as a necessary condition, like with the educated class’s approval of deep state shenanigans to keep a lid on an entire demography disparaged as ‘deplorables’). Then, even as people gripe about corruption, they resist efforts to reform society because they fear the alternative even more. Better to keep the Swamp if only to keep out Literally Hitler Trump.

The way things are going, the West created by Northern Europeans will go the way of Southern Italy and Greece in terms of governance and ‘national character’. Southern Italians and Greeks incessantly complain about corruption but resist all attempts at reform because corruption flows in their veins. It’s like blacks complain about crime/violence but resist attempts to root it out as it’s so much a part of black culture and way of doing things.

Poland is plenty corrupt from top to bottom. Perhaps, Poles associate corruption with the East and look to the West for a cleaner model. While the workings of the bureaucracy may be cleaner(at least in Northern European nations), the soul of the West is rotten to the core, especially at the very top because the nations of the West lack national autonomy. EU nations are vassals of the US, the crown/clown jewel of the Empire of Judea.
A sound national policy is difficult when so-called leaders are essentially led by the nose by a hostile empire. That a relatively cleaner government is no panacea to national demise can be seen in the UK, Germany, and Sweden. They have cleaner governments than Italy, Greece, and Poland, but that didn’t stop them from embarking on national suicide. If anything, their cleaner governments likely accelerated the demise because whatever harmful policy from above was efficiently implemented at all levels of society.

Clean government means law and order, and law and order can lead to prosperity. Order and Wealth leads to boredom and neurosis(like with the characters in Ingmar Bergman films). Also, prosperity means a more generous and naive outlook about the world, such as ‘Save Africa’. Also, extended peace robs people of the warrior spirit that can smell danger. (Of course, Jewish-led globalist ideology informed white people that their survival instincts are ‘atavistic’, ‘backward’, ‘extreme’, and ‘far right’, even as Jews stress upon survival instinct in Israel. According to Jews, any white will-to-survival is a ‘pathology’.) Boredom, naivete, and good-will spelled doom for Sweden, especially as clean Swedes went about applying the new globalist agenda with proficiency.
A silver lining about less clean orders is people tend to be less trusting and more survival-minded than good-will-minded. Now, a trust-culture is better than a distrust-culture but ONLY IF the elites are worthy of trust. If the elites are worthless cucks whose agenda will lead to national demise, a trust-culture is the worst possible thing for that society. The people will trust the elites and go over the cliff like so many lemmings, which is now the fate of East Asian countries as well.

Anyway, Jewish Power is messing up the world, not least because Jewish intervention expands local conflicts into global ones. The Syrian War would have ended quickly with Assad victorious but for the fact that Jewish-controlled US encouraged Turkey, Saudis, Israel and others to descend upon Syria like a pack of vultures. Thus, it turned into a major conflagration.
While US-Iranian relations would remain scarred by events of 1979, it would be a lot better if not for the Jewish Lobby that insists on Israel remaining the ONLY Middle East nation with nukes. How surreal that Israel with hundreds of nukes gets billions in ‘aid’, whereas Iran, a nation with no nukes, is among the most sanctioned by the West.

And what’s the beef between the US and Russia? Many Americans seem to seethe with hatred toward Russia, but why? They rely on the Jewish-controlled Media that say Putin is ‘Putler’ and etc., or Russia is evil because it won’t have homo parades. If not for Jewish Power, most Americans would feel no hostility toward Russia. They might not see eye to eye with the Russian Way, but no one would be for another ‘cold war’. Anti-Russian policy is totally about Jewish sour-grapes because Putin got in the way of the oligarchs of the Tribe.

Also, the notion of a white majority nation being proud of its identity/heritage and its religion and saying NO to the NWO(or JWO) is threatening to Jews because its act of heroic liberation might spread to other white majority nations. Jews pretend to oppose Russia as a matter of ‘democracy vs autocracy’, but these same Jews are now the main enemies of free speech in the West. They use Antifa terror and thuggery to shut people down. According to Jews, ‘democracy’ is whenever their puppets win. If the people freely elect someone Jews dislike, it’s ‘autocracy’. Jews would have us believe Ukraine is about ‘liberal democracy’ because Jews and their puppets run it to destabilize the national sovereignty of Russia.

Jewish Perfidy has its tentacles all around the world. Why did Jewish Power make things so difficult for Trump’s attempted negotiations with North Korea? Because North Korea has nukes and sets an example for nations hated by Israel. (Never mind N. Korea rushed to get them because Neocon Jews urged Bush II to include it in the ‘Axis of Evil’, aka next target for destruction. Gaddafi, who gave up his WMD, surely learned the hard way.) Besides, why would Jews tolerate a possible reunification of the peninsula and withdrawal of US forces when South Korea is such a useful puppet(and willing whore) in the global chess game?

The Jewish Supremacist craziness extends all over Latin America. The policy is as follows: Any nation that shows any sign of defiance and independently negotiates with Russia, Iran, or etc. is to be targeted for regime-change. So, Bolivia came into the crosshairs of US neo-imperialism. Venezuela has been marked for destruction. The talk of Venezuela interfering in US elections was rich coming from the US establishment that’s been interfering in Latin American affairs forever. But as the Jew Taboo dictates that you mustn’t name the Jews, even critics of US policy tend to blame anything other than Jewish Power. If a Jew kicked Alex Jones in the balls, he would squeal about the Ay-rabs or ‘Chicoms’.

While Jewish Power isn’t the sole culprit for the world’s woes, it usually makes things worse by the use of various well-funded proxies, all on the basis of ‘good for Jews’. Whether it’s George Soros breaking the Bank of England or Paul Singer leeching off other nations, the worldwide cabal is there as a support system. And who spread all this hideous neo-satanic globo-homo madness? Jewish activists and their enablers did. And why did the majority of whites become so defenseless against such rot? Because their minds have been molded by the 2 PC’s of political-correctness and pop-culture controlled by Jews.

The prophecy of Karl Marx ultimately failed, but a kind of Marxism did come to fruition. That of Groucho, Chico, and Harpo. Look all around, and global politics is rather like DUCK SOUP(or Cuck Soup). Tricky Jews practice prank politics and lead the stiff/square white goyim by the nose.
The build-up to the Iraq War was like the “We’re Going to War” scene in DUCK SOUP. Jewish operatives and handlers run circles around goy politicians & celebs like Groucho, Chico, and Harpo around WASPs(as straight men). Jewish Power is usually several moves ahead, and goyim predictably succumb in bemusement at every turn.
Of course, as we’re expected to take the joke seriously, current world affairs is like a straight-faced comedy, one where Jews laugh beneath their breath at the goyim who stand upright in earnest. In an earlier era, DUCK SOUP might have seemed a satire of warmongers but no longer. It’s more like a twisted manual of how Jews can manipulate thick-skulled, square, lame, or dimwit goyim into just about anything. How is the scene in DUCK SOUP any different from what happens in Congress, CIA, or the Pentagon? In a way, can we blame Jews for their contempt for goyim with the likes of Tom Cotton and Mike Johnson as the face/voice of patriotism and conservative values?

The late Jerry(or Jewry) Springer, like the Marx Brothers, was rather revealing about the Jew-Goy dynamic. What was his shtick? He brought on these disgruntled goyim and goaded them to insult and beat one another up as the dimwit white/black trash audience chanted ‘Jerry, Jerry, Jerry’.
Naturally, individuals have gripes, personal or political, all across America, but Springer exploited the situation and blew up these squabbles into public feuds, a kind of World War Trash. He exploited trivial matters and inflated them into a kind of national psychodrama. And while these hapless and stupid goyim made total fools out of themselves(while also delighting in their 15 min of fame as insta-celebrities), Springer stood apart, safe and aloof, chuckling with contempt at the easily duped goyim. And even as Springer exploited both sides of any argument or ‘debate’, they appealed to Springer as the impartial moderator, fair-minded judge, or sympathetic ear. It’s so much like current politics. Jewish Power plays Democrats against Republicans and vice versa, squeezing all it can from both sides, but all we get from both parties is an appeal to Jewry, like the appeal to Jerry from the duped and abused on his show.

How is this any different from how Jews play world politics? True, there are deep-seated tensions and problems all around the world. But they are local in nature AS LONG AS some global power doesn’t pour gasoline on them. The Armenian-Azerbaijani conflict wouldn’t have gotten this bad IF George Soros didn’t encourage Armenia to make dumb decisions and if Israel didn’t supply Azerbaijan with weapons. Notice how Jews play both sides, just like Jerry Springer pretended to care for all his guests when, in fact, he was using them like chickens in a cockfight.

On the talk show, sleazeball Jerry Springer bestrode the stage as the grandmaster, a kind of Soros-ian figure. And the big beefy security guys were like the US military. They kept the order. Did they keep order for order’s sake? No, the order was to provide ‘safe space’ for the guests to brawl like demented gladiators and make total fools of themselves.

What has happened to hapless goyim around the world as the result of World Jewry? Just ask the Armenians, Ukrainians, Georgians, Palestinians, Syrians, and etc. Will anyone learn? Imagine that. Jewish supremacists mess up the world, but the world pleads for Jewish sympathy or poses as the enemy of the purported enemies of Jews. In this, Vladimir Putin and Donald Trump are hardly different. Jews turned Ukraine into a battering ram against Russia, but what we get from the Kremlin is “Russia is fighting the Neo-Nazis”(thereby ostensibly preventing another Holocaust) when those very ‘Nazis’ are the proxies of World Jewry. Jewish Lawfare has harassed Donald Trump to no end, and Jewish-run media have tarred him as a wanna-be-dictator or Literally Hitler, but all we get from Trump is “Biden is the real Anti-Semite, and as President I will defend Jews from another Holocaust”(when it’s the Israelis who are doing what resembles the UN definition of genocide and when the Jewish Plan for the white race is hardly different from that for the Palestinians). Gee, maybe if we flatter Jews as a race of Einsteins while dumping on Palestinians as a bunch of Sirhan-Sirhans, maybe Jews will mend their ways and toss us some doggy biscuits. How has this strategy worked out since the Bill-Buckley-Cuckley years?

As the Tribe has ungodly powers of finance, media, academia, big tech, gambling, deep state, and Shoah Worship(which deems any criticism of Jews as ‘Anti-Semitic’ and ‘Nazi’). It’s like a mafia extortion scheme where one must pay ‘protection money’ and show respect to the extortionists. But protection from whom? From the one providing the ‘protection’, as if you don’t pay, your place will go up in flames. It’s as if the Jewish mob bosses have taken on the role of the ‘protective’ god.

We’ve been told that the Diversity Craze and PC(or ‘wokeness’) are about Anti-White-ism and celebration of nonwhites, but are they really so? If the current reigning ideology were truly anti-white across the board, it would gain little traction with most whites. Many whites embrace it because it’s white-elitist and appeals to the suppressed ‘spiritual’ side of man. A white person who adopts ‘wokeness’ is made to feel morally elitist(over the incorrigibly ‘racist’ whites) and socially elevated because most higher institutions are governed by PC codes. Furthermore, people are naturally spiritual even if irreligious at the personal level. Just like vegans crave meat — the mind can be moral but the body isn’t — , modern secular folks, despite their conceit of rationality, crave the sacred and spiritual because emotional balance yearns for it. Of course, real religion is preferable for the spiritually inclined, just like it’s better to have meat-protein than the soy kind.

Religion says God is above all. Now, why is this a problem for Jews? Because if Christianity or Islam is true and if God is above all, then it means all races should bow down before God as the ultimate judge. Under God, Jews and Goyim would be judged equally. And even if Jews believe God has chosen them above goyim, it would still mean God’s authority lords over Jewish power. Jewish Supremacists don’t want equality with goyim and don’t want any authority above their own, and so, they favor secularization.
Now, a secular order can be for justice for all. If the Law calls for equal justice regardless of race, color, or creed, that means Jews must be treated and judged like anyone else. But, such would run counter to Jewish Supremacist aspirations. Then, it’s no surprise that the Jewish activist-elites, the masters of psychology, infused the modern secular mind(that secretly hungers for ‘higher meaning’) with the quasi-spiritual worship of Jews and their favored allies.

So, Diversity isn’t about equal celebration of all non-white groups but special celebration and apotheosis of Jews, along with blacks and homos. If PC or ‘wokeness’ were truly about equal justice for all the diverse groups, then the media would run as many pro-Palestinian and pro-Syrian stories as pro-Jewish stories. Hollywood would have made many TV shows and movies about Nakba and the dark side of Zionism. In actuality, while the media almost never run anti-Zionist stories, they are filled with anti-Russian, anti-Iranian, and anti-anything-hated-by-Jews stories.

When Michael Brown strong-armed an immigrant business owner whose store was later ransacked by black thugs, where was the concern for his kind? None. Blacks matter, they don’t. If Diversity is about the celebration of all sexual expressions and deviancies, why is there no month-long celebration of incest?
It’s telling that most nonwhite groups don’t champion their own identities and cultures but seek justification via association or identification with one of the sacred identities, namely Jewish, black, and homo. A Japanese-American in search of meaning and validation is more likely to hold up a BLM sign or globo-homo ‘rainbow’ banner than anything related to Japan, the land of his ancestors.

How many nonwhites would succeed in Wall Street, Hollywood, or Big Tech if they displayed the Palestinian Flag? Amidst all the recent turmoil, the powers-that-be have vowed to blacklist anyone associated with pro-Palestinian protests that denounce the ‘Gaza Genocide’.
A Burmese-American showing pride in Burmese identity doesn’t get him very far. An Iranian-American extolling the greatness of Iran earns almost no wokemon points. For approval or success, they are better off waving the homo flag or displaying a BLM sign.
In contrast, it’s great for a Jew to say he’s proud to be Jewish. It’s sensational for a homo to say sodomy is ‘pride’. It’s awesome for blacks to pontificate on how ‘black lives matter’ even though blacks are the main killers of blacks. Then, Diversity is less about the celebration of non-white identities than about most non-white groups bowing at the altars of Jewish Identity, Black Identity, and Globo-Homo, the Tri-Supremacism.

This is why the pro-Palestinian movement is so important because it signals a birth of something meaningful and compelling INDEPENDENT of the Jewish god-factory that decides what is sacred and what is profane. Against all the amassed armies of Jewish Power, a movement has burst upon the scene that dares to focus on and even sacralize the suffering of the Palestinians, at the hands of Jewish Supremacists no less. And many involved are conscientious Jews and courageous goyim who’ve chosen, despite all the risks and threats, to view and judge the world on a set of values and principles liberated from the claws of Jewish megalomania.

What do privileged whites get from ‘wokeness’? While many whites do lose out, it provides quasi-spiritual succor to the white elites and as well to wanna-be-elite whites who, lacking privilege, settle for the next-best thing, which is attitude(of virtue-signaling), as in “I work at Starbucks and live in a cramped apartment, but I listen to NPR and read the New Yorker like all the sOpHiStIcAtEd people about town”.

PC and ‘wokeness’ are specifically devised not to target all whites(because if all whites lose out, they’ll have no choice but to band together against the Power). While it beats many whites with the stick as ‘racist’, it offers ‘spiritual’ and careerist carrots to those who make a show of repentance and redemption. The atonement can be sincere(among the naive & childlike) or cynical(among the craven & opportunistic)but, either way, bestows immediate status or justifies the existing privileges of those whites who’ve chosen to be ‘baptized’.

In a way, ‘wokeness’ is more exciting for whites than for nonwhites. Whereas Jews, blacks, and homos can only feel righteous rage, whites can experience the full drama, the passion play, of sainthood. Or the Road-to-Damascus Moment, though it’s more like ‘dumbass-cuss’. Just like it’s refreshing to take a shower when one’s dirty and sweaty, it feels great to be washed of ‘sin’, which among secular whites is ‘racism’, ‘antisemitism’, and ‘homophobia’. Evangelicals are about being Born-Again, and white secularists are essentially Evanglobalists. They feel born-again, hallelujah.

Furthermore, the notion of ‘white privilege’ has a perversely empowering effect on whites. After all, if ‘white supremacism’ is built into the System, then it means whites are indeed superior in power, wealth, and everything. That means whites have two options. Be greedy and keep all the goodies for themselves OR share the bounty with the less fortunate and showcase their magnanimity.
Privileged whites who buy into ‘white guilt’ regard themselves as the all-powerful group that is being kind and generous than a declining racial group being bullied and intimidated into acquiescence.

Besides, ‘wokeness’ really aids and abets white privilege. How? If White Power(meaning the shared and united power of all whites) is taboo and must be stamped out, then there can only be privilege for white individuals. The notion of ‘privilege’ NEVER applies to all members of a group. In Old Europe, the privileged were the noblemen, not all white people. So, if white people cannot consolidate power as a group or collective, then the only option is for white individuals to seek privilege for themselves and their children.

When ‘wokeness’ speaks of ‘white privilege’, it’s as if ALL whites share in it. But, privilege is inherently exclusive. For example, the white advantage over blacks in Old America was the result of white power. Whites were united back then and identified with one another, from top to bottom, from east to west. White power cut through white privilege, i.e. poor whites without privilege shared in the power of whiteness. Power can exist against or without special caste privilege.

If power(of unity) is forbidden to whites, there is only the privilege for whites-as-individuals seeking it on their own. So, for whites who reject the burden of uniting with all whites and marching together as a united folk(as Moses did with the Israelites), ‘wokeness’ works just fine because it allows them to work only for their own privilege than for the power of the race as a whole. After all, privilege is less daunting as a task than power is. It would have been easier for Moses to keep his privilege in Egypt and live well than give it up to strive for the power of his people as a collective unity.

Besides, as ‘born-again good whites’, these white cucky-wucks are allowed to feel oh-so-righteous and holy-schmoly, which is in more ways than one a continuation of Christian Psychology. Elevate oneself by humbling oneself. “Oh, I admit I’m a sinner, and that makes me better than you!”
Humbly bowing before God and Jesus means your side is blessed with the right to conquer the heathens and destroy the heretics. It’s the Christian Paradox: The lower you kneel, the higher you feel. Same with today’s cucky-wuck worshipers of Anne Frank, Barbra Streisand, MLK, Mandela, George Floyd, and Harvey Milk. And this mentality now infects the so-called ‘right’ as well as the ‘left’.