The Myth of Jewish Reciprocity, or the Bogosity of the If-Hitler-Had-Been-Nice-to-the-Jews Argument

 

The What-If’s make for interesting historical debate. Few developments were inevitable in history, though plenty of events were more likely than not to happen. There were forks along the road, and the current history in which we live is the product of the paths that were taken by those in power.
‘History’ in the generic sense means the documented/recorded and analyzed story of just about anything, e.g. the history of some small town called Bumbleville with the population of 200, the history of fly-fishing, the history of toy-making, and etc. But in the grand sense, History means the Story of Power, and for good or for ill, a small handful of people got to decide the fates of mankind.

If Current History is the product of what is remembered, it is as much, if not more so, about what has been forgotten or is (consciously)repressed. In a way, it’s like the workings of the human mind, a storage of countless details of events, incidents, and eccentricities of our lives.
However, depending on our profession and/or purpose, we tend to focus solely on those things that are of relevance to our needs in the here-and-now. Suppose someone suffered a trauma as a victim. If he’s in the military as a leader of a squadron, he’ll likely push his self-pitying victim-narrative to the back-burner as he must exude strength and confidence. However, if his profession is therapeutic, he might invoke his own victimhood to convey empathy for those who suffered similarly.

Granted, Christianity(and modern Jewishness) perfected the art of combining self-pity with ruthless aggression: “Sanctified by our saintly suffering, we’re morally justified in beating the war drums and destroying our enemies.”
Because the media apparatus controls short-term active memory whereas the academia functions largely as storage of long-term dormant memory, the media exert far more influence on Current History, though, to be sure, given the sheer politicization of the academia, many ‘scholars’ are far less interested in the depth of knowledge than what’s most useful to fashionable agendas.

The Jewish-run media have a funny idea of the ‘enemy’. The supposed enemies of the US, more often than not, aren’t those countries that chose to be enemies but were designated as such on the basis of “Is it good for the Jews?” So, even though Russia has long wanted good relations with the US, it’s been an ‘enemy’ because it didn’t totally put out like a whore to World Jewry. And even though China doesn’t want to be an enemy, it’s hyped as such because Jews prefer Americans to fixate on Yellow Peril as a distraction from Jewish Domination of the West.
Even Iran, always placed at the top of the list as an enemy of the US, has sought working relations with the West. It too is a designated-enemy than an enemy-of-its-own-choosing.
Jewish Power is like a mad-bitch girlfriend who insists on deciding who her lover’s friends and enemies are. No matter how much someone wants to be his friend, he must reject him as an ‘enemy’ if the mad bitch whispers into his ears to do so.
As such, the US has ended up with so many unnecessary enemies, or enemies only because Jews have designated them as such. It means White America has no agency in deciding with whom it should be friends or enemies. Jews decide, whites follow. Notice how the US interfered in the Middle East in the name of fighting terrorists after 9/11 but now regards Syria as a ‘friendly country’ even though it’s ‘led’ by a Jihadist(though some say he’s a crypto-Jew).

History is vast, but Current History operates only in relation to active memory while 99% of historical memory remains dormant and buried. No wonder the Western Media got away with pushing the ‘unprovoked Russian invasion of Ukraine’ narrative. They keep buried all the histories of what had happened to Russia in the 1990s, how the West manipulated events in Ukraine with one Color Revolution after another, how the Kiev authority shelled civilians in Donbass, and etc.
Instead, the narrative activates the selective memories of autocratic Putin murdering dissidents and Russians barging into Ukraine. Same goes for the crisis surrounding Iran. Instead of a complex narrative, we get a cookie-cutter cartoon about tyrannical mullahs secretly cooking up a Bomb, presumably to blow up London and NY, along with Israel. Never mentioned are Israel’s support of terrorism(and its own founding through terrorist acts, not just against the Arabs but the British) and the dark story of its attaining the Bomb, as well as the fact it hasn’t been pressed upon to come clean on these matters.
At the deeper level, on matters of Jewish-and-Goy relations, for example, the active memory dwells on numerous instances of goy-on-Jewish hatred and/or violence while keeping in dormant storage all the details about Jewish contempt for goyim. The history of Jewish antipathy toward goyim is certainly shelved in the stacks but not placed on the lectern.

At any rate, things are even worse because so much of Current History operates not only on the basis of selective memory but distorted or even outright false memory. In other words, even the paths-not-taken are invoked as if they were. Iran long ago decided not to build the Bomb, which means it took the non-Bomb path when faced with several alternatives. But, the West speaks of Iran as if it took the path of the Bomb. Iran doesn’t have the Bomb, but the West prefers the What-If-Iran-Got-The-Bomb narrative as holy writ. Suppose you had the choice of stealing some expensive jewelry but chose not to, but people still speak of you as if you did.
Current History is often molded from Let’s-Pretend-History, i.e. let’s just pretend something happened even if it didn’t and go with that. Some idiot is likely to raise the question, “WHAT IF Iran had negotiated on the nuclear issue. Then, Israel and the US would not have attacked.” Yes, an interesting what-if, except that Iran was indeed negotiating with the US(as spokesman for Israel) but got attacked anyway by the collusion of Israel and the US deep state.

One of the big What-If’s of History concerns what might have been if Adolf Hitler and National Socialism hadn’t been Anti-Jewish or Anti-Semitic. What if it had been more like Italian Fascism, at least prior to its drastic revision on the Jewish Question following the alliance with Germany. (Incidentally, National Socialist Germany probably would have weathered the storm had it not been so anti-Russo-Slavic, a more important what-if.)

But then, how would one define Anti-Jewishness in this context? Even if one isn’t anti-Jewish but is opposed to the agendas favored by Jews, one could be perceived by Jews as the enemy. Take all those Christian Zionist zealots who fetishize Jews and allow themselves to be exploited by the Tribe. Do Jews merely find them useful(but distasteful regardless) or truly regard them as a friendly people? Even as Jews accept the support of the Evangelicals, they do everything to push policies that demean and degrade Christian power in the US.

The politics of Liking-the-Jews is fraught with dangers because of the tribalist-supremacist-exclusionary attitudes of Judaism and Jewishness. Besides, many Jews are merely ethnically Jewish and define their truer identity in association with ideology; therefore, if you have no problem with Jewishness per se but disagree with Jewish-favored agendas, you could still be construed as ‘anti-Jewish’, e.g. “If you’re anti-cosmopolitan, then you could be anti-Jewish because Jews take pride in their supposedly rootless cosmopolitanism.”

The politics of Liking-Jews is like the politics of Liking-Nazis. Even if Russians expressed affection for Nazi Germans, the latter’s ideology was invested in enslaving/exterminating the Russians. Palestinians found out the hard way with the way of the Jews. Many Palestinians were favorably disposed to the Jews and didn’t object to Jewish immigration in the early years of Modern Palestine; many Palestinians even welcomed Jewish arrivals, but Zionism was predicated on, by hook and by crook, taking over the land and displacing the Palestinians. It had a mini-me Lebensraum Plan. (And how did it turn out for the American Indians who took a liking to the Pilgrims and fed them a turkey dinner?)

Because of the very nature of Talmudic Judaism, which is ethno-spiritually contemptuous of lowly goyim, and the very nature of Jewishness, which is monomaniacal in its ideological worldviews — “We Neocons are right about everything and must have everything our way, and that’s that” — , Liking-Jews is hardly enough to satisfy the Jews. Imagine you telling Bob, “You know, Bob, I think you’re a swell guy, and I like you”, but that’s not enough for Bob to like you back; you must agree with everything he says, must believe whatever he believes, and must do as he tells you, even if doing so may cause harm to yourself and your loved ones.

Given the nature of National Socialism, its hypothetical Philo-Semitism might still have been regarded as ‘Anti-Semitic’ or Anti-Jewish to many Jews. Even if National Socialism had excised the racial aspect of its ‘antisemitism’, it still would have found itself in opposition to much of Jewish power, influence, and proclivities. Suppose National Socialism welcomed and embraced those Jews who were willing to be Good Germans and patriots. Thus, it wouldn’t have been opposed to Jews as a race, i.e. as long as Jews were willing to make common cause with the Germans, they could be good comrades. Now, certain German Jews would surely have taken the bargain, either out of genuine admiration for National Socialism or mere opportunism. But would this have spared National Socialist Germany from the accusation of being anti-Jewish or Anti-Semitic from the perspective of World Jewry?
Christianity, after all, isn’t an racial credo, therefore not opposed to Jews on the basis of blood. If Jews convert to Christianity and become good Christians, they’re welcome as brothers and sisters. But has the lack of racial antisemitism in Christianity lessened the general Jewish hostility toward and contempt for Christianity?

National Socialism, even had it been accepting of Jews, would still have pressed upon them to favor German-ness over Jewishness as the primary object of loyalty. World Jewry might have had an issue with such a demand.
Indeed, during the Cold War, what was the main beef that Jews had with the Soviet Union? In the communist empire, Jews could work in any profession. They were accepted as good comrades. They weren’t discriminated against on the basis of Jewish identity. The problem arose ONLY IF Jews favored Jewish-Tribal or Jewish-Global interests over their loyalty to the Soviet Union.
Thus, even though the Soviet Union provided the Jews with the same rights that all other groups were entitled to, no more but no less, this pissed off many Jews around the world and turned them against the USSR.
In contrast, the Jews came to favor the US because it allowed for and then even celebrated Jewish Exceptionalism, which eventually turned into full-blown Jewish Supremacism that now forces all the West to revolve around Jewish megalomania. Such being the way of Jewishness, could Jews have come to terms with a National Socialist Germany that accepted Jews on the basis of their primary loyalty being to Germany? Probably not.

For Jews, getting ‘something’(which is what most people can hope for) isn’t enough. They must have EVERYTHING. Given the nature of National Socialism, it could offer Jews ‘something’ but not everything. Also, Jews had to agree to the terms of German patriotism, i.e Jewishness would have to be subsumed into the German national polity. Also, Jews would have to renounce parasitism, gangsterism, radicalism, and degeneracy they’d become so closely associated with during the Weimar Era, which most Germans regarded as Hell but which many Jews regarded as Heaven, much like Russia in the 1990s, a time when the bottom fell off for most Russians while sky was the limit for the Jews. Could World Jewry have accepted such terms?

At any rate, let’s assume that some kind of amity could have been reached between the National Socialist Germans and World Jewry. This Germany wouldn’t have been racially anti-Jewish and would have accepted Jews as fellow patriots(if willing to submit to the ideology of National Socialism), but it still would have been at odds with many attitudes and agendas pervasive among Jews at the time.
Still, as this Germany wouldn’t have been hostile to Jewishness per se, World Jewry might have chosen to do business with it.
Besides, we must keep in mind that this was before World War II and the Holocaust that would later elevate Jews to holy status. Back in the 1930s, even so-called Liberal Democracies had prominent figures in arts and politics who openly discussed the baleful influence of certain Jewish elements. By today’s standards of utterly deranged Philo-Semitism, even the US of the interwar period was ‘rabidly and virulently Anti-Semitic’, e.g. there was no shame in WASP clubs explicitly excluding Jews from membership and there were plenty of Christians preaching, “Yes, the Jews did kill Christ.”

With World Jewry tempering or withholding its hostility against Germany in the West, there might have been less resistance to Hitler’s territorial ambitions with neighboring nations. Also, had war broken out between Germany and the Soviet Union, the West might have either sided with Germany(against the ‘Asiatic’ commie hordes) or, at the very least, remained neutral, all the while doing business with Germany and supplying it with necessary material. Not that this would have ensured German victory over the USSR, but the Germans would have better shot at winning.

What bogged the Germans down in World War II was the repeat of the two-front war, though, to be sure, it was by their own design as the Germans had attacked the USSR first, whereby the most interesting What-If question is, “What if Germany had kept the peace with the USSR?”, notwithstanding alternative theories that Stalin had his own plans to advance westward.
Even though Germany became embroiled in war with the West(Britain and France) before with the East(Soviet Union), Hitler’s grand vision entailed an eventual clash with the East(while hoping for peace with the West).
Jewish influence played a significant part in swaying the British elites toward conflict with Germany. The influence was either direct(via monetary control over politicians) or indirect(via manipulation of paranoia about Germany as a threat to its British hegemony).
Jewish indirect influence also came by way of control of fashionable ideology, i.e. even those goy elites and elite-aspirants, who hardly thought about Jewish matters, fell under the spell of Jewish-biased intellectual norms that came to favor the Left over the Right. Thus, even though the New Deal actually had more in common with National Socialism as an economic policy, many Progressive types either idealized the Soviet system or were less antagonistic to it than to National Socialism, which was seen as a monstrosity.

At any rate, Jewish influence in the UK and US might not have been so unrelentingly anti-German had Hitler’s Germany not been so virulently anti-Jewish. Still, World Jewry might have been nearly as hostile to this hypothetical Germany simply because its economic program and political agenda(even if not anti-Jewish) stood in the way of finance-capitalism of the Western Jews and Marxism-Leninism of the Eastern Jews. (After all, the CIA toppled many governments even if they weren’t anti-American or anti-capitalist simply because their economic policies conflicted with US corporate interests.)
One thing for sure, had Hitler’s Germany been on better terms with the West, Stalin would have been far more vigilant about the German threat, thereby preventing the heavy losses suffered by the USSR in Operation Barbarossa.

One oft-heard argument is that Germany’s antisemitism lost out big in one crucial area: Science, so crucial to military technology. As some of the brightest minds in the German territories were Jews, their exile greatly benefitted the US(that soon became an enemy of Germany) and their persecution(or even elimination) denied German science of key talent. This argument is made especially in relation to the development of the atomic bomb, in the making of which Jewish scientists in the US played a significant role.

But, this argument isn’t quite convincing given the chronology of events. The US was untouched by war and had more manpower, wealth, and resources than the other great powers. Thus, it could invest more heavily into the atomic program than its peer competitors could. But even with all the effort and expenditure, the US produced the Bomb only in 1945 and after Germany’s defeat.
If the US, with all its advantages, just barely produced the Bomb in the last year of the conflict, it’s hardly likely that Germany, with more limited funds and resources, could have done any better even if it had kept its Jewish scientists.
Most likely, no such weapon could have been produced in time to use against the Soviets who would have rolled into Berlin by then. If Mainland USA, which was untouched by war, took so long to build the Bomb, what was the chance that Germany, already at war and expending the bulk of its resources against the Soviets, could have done any better even with the aid of Jewish scientists?

Video Link

But for the sake of argument, let’s suppose Jewish scientists in Germany had the magic touch and could have procured the Bomb for Hitler much earlier, say in 1942 or 1943(when the tide decisively turned in favor of the Soviets). Equipped with the Bomb, the Germans could now blow up entire divisions of the Soviet army and then blow up Soviet cities up too. And so, Germany wins, in which case Hitler’s gamble of being-nice-to-Jews would have paid off.
But, what would this have done to Jewish moral reputation? Jews would have played a key role in supplying madman Hitler with the ultimate weapon to conquer and destroy an entire civilization. Jews would have to share in the Nazi Guilt with the Germans in the horrifying campaign of enslavement and extermination in the East. It’d be like a much grander version of the current Judeo-Nazi alliance in Ukraine.

The biggest sigh of relief of World War II was that Russia somehow survived and prevailed over its ‘existential’ enemy. Sure, communism sucked and Stalin was a monster, but Hitler didn’t invade to liberate the Eastern Slavs(and other ethnic groups) from communism but to enslave them under Nazism. If Jews had made the Bomb for Hitler, the greatest Jewish minds would have been complicit in one of the greatest crimes in history.
Had they been offered an equal partnership in the conquest and carving up of Russia, would German Jews(and/or World Jewry) have taken the bait, especially if Hitler promised to enslave/exterminate the Russo-Slavs but spare the Jewish Bolsheviks? If so, it seems Hitler’s antisemitism did Jews a favor for preventing their participation in one of history’s ghastliest ventures.

Video Link

Whether the hypothetical Jewish-German alliance would have been viable or not, there’s plenty of evidence to the contrary that Being-Nice-to-Jews is any guarantee of Jewish reciprocity.
One conundrum is that Jewish Power is almost never satisfied with ‘enough’ and wants everything. If ‘enough’ is offered, it’s seen as an insult to Jewish pride(of mono/megalomania). But then, giving the Jews everything they want is no guarantee either because Jews will look upon anyone or any people who’d do that as a bunch of suckers and retards, so dumb as to deserve being robbed of everything. Anyway one looks at it, it’s a lose-lose situation as long as the Jews are in megalomaniacal and supremacist mode, which is ingrained in the guts-and-minds of many Jews. Give them ‘enough’, and Jews want ‘everything’. Give them ‘everything’, and Jews lose all respect for the dummies who fell for the swindle. Does Paulie have any respect for the restaurant owner: “F*** you, Pay me.”

Video Link

Let’s consider some examples of Liking-Jews didn’t pay off in Jews-Liking-Back. The Arabs in Palestine were initially welcoming of Jewish settlers. Some even welcomed Jewish immigrants into their homes. Given this reality, did the Zionists settle for some kind of mutual understanding between the two groups? No, the furtive plan of the Jews, even when they were on friendly terms with the Arabs, was always to create the conditions whereby the Jews would collectively ambush the Palestinians and drive them from their lands. Zionists speak of how they had no choice but to fight off the hostile Arabs, but the fact remains that the early Jewish settlers in Palestine were mostly met with friendly or indifferent Arabs. The violence resulted from the gradual realization among the Arabs that the Jews not-so-secretly meant to displace them and grab the entirety of the Holy Land for the Jews(mostly of European descent).

If Jews really want something, they can’t settle for a compromise and must have it all. The so-called Two-State Solution, for example, was just smoke-and-mirrors to create the illusion of compromise while the Jewish State always planned to use tyranny and terror to drive out the Palestinians and annex the territories into Greater Israel. And every success whets Jewish Supremacist appetite for more and more. Notice what the Greater Israel project has done to Iraq, Libya, and Syria, now a carcass for Israel and its ally Turkey to tear apart and devour. And recently, Jews even made a move on Iran. All these years, Iran tried to meet the Jewish-controlled West halfway with promises not to build nuclear weapons, but there was no reciprocity from the Jewish side(that has many nukes aimed at Iran).

Next, consider the example of wartime Japan. Despite it being part of the Axis, Japan didn’t coordinate with Germany on a single battle. Their wars unfolded in separate spheres, which means that the Japanese, for all their horrible crimes, committed no atrocities against the Jews. Furthermore, Japan refused to abide by Germany’s racial ideology and policies regarding the Jews and, as such, contributed nothing to the Holocaust. If anything, key Japanese figures even provided protection for certain Jewish communities in Asia.
But, did any of this matter to Jewish-Americans with their outsized contribution to the making of the Bomb? Did Jews try to persuade the powers-that-be to spare Japan from being nuked, especially as Germany had already surrendered and Japan teetered on total defeat? No, Jews were happy to see the nukes dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It’s all the more disturbing considering that the US plan was to drop 10 or 12 more nukes if Japan didn’t surrender. It seems Jews would have been okay with that too.
So, if the Japanese hoped that Being-Nice to Jews during the war would have earned them some favors from the Jews, they were sorely mistaken. Jews were awfully proud of their Bomb and happy to have them vaporize the ‘Japs’ to demonstrate their genius and prowess.

Now, consider Iran with its long-existing Jewish community. It’s been well-documented that the Jews Iran are tolerated and well-treated. Whether under the Shah or the Ayatollah, the Jewish community has been left alone to practice its religion and do business. Indeed, the Islamic Republic of Iran has long maintained that their problem isn’t with Judaism but with Zionism as an imperialist and supremacist ideology. Iran has no problem with Jews living in the Holy Land. The problem is with Jewish Supremacist Zionists treating the Palestinians, Muslims and Christians alike, as inferior beings to knock around.
Even many Jews who are obsessed with anti-Iran feelings acknowledge that the Jewish community in Iran has long thrived there. There are no pogroms in Iran, let alone anything like a Holocaust.

Even through all these years when World Jewry effectively declared war on Iran, Iranian authorities refused to go the Nazi-like path and target the Jewish community for special punishment(or revenge against global Jewish Power). In other words, it avoided the moral mistakes of the Germans who committed acts like Kristallnacht.
But has global Jewish animus toward Iran been any less intense than the Jewish hatred for National Socialist Germany? No, Global Jewish Power has done just about anything to destroy Iran and reduce it to another anal-rape victim of Zion. Iran’s well-treatment of its Jewish population has meant absolutely NOTHING to its Zionist tormentors who’re hellbent on making Iran succumb under pressure to all the Jewish demands and then some.
Iranians can go out of their way to show that they are not Anti-Semitic(or Anti-Jewish), only Anti-Zionist(or Anti-Jewish-Supremacist), till the cows come home, but they’ll get no relief from the endless barrage of hatred, literal or rhetorical, from World Jewry that is now represented by the likes of Benjamin Netanyahu.
The Islamic Republic of Iran has been nothing like National Socialist Germany on the Jewish Question but has been just as reviled and targeted for destruction by the Empire of Judea.

Now, let’s consider post-communist Russia. In the 1990s, Jews got hold of that vast country through their puppet-whore Boris Yeltsin and looted just about everything they could get their hands on. Russian Jews, European Jews, Israeli Jews, and American Jews all coordinated their efforts to carve the flesh off the bones of Russia. It was like watching a school of piranhas going at a helpless mammal in the river. It was like watching jackals and seagulls devour the flesh of a beached whale. What Jews did to Russia in the 1990s may well go beyond what Jews did to Germany during the Weimar Era.

Given this reality, the post-Yeltsin government in Russia could have taken a hard line against the Jews. But Putin didn’t. Even though he reined in the worst of the Jewish oligarchs, many Jewish oligarchs were allowed to keep their vast wealth(though ill-gotten) and privileges. Also, Putin made a special effort to protect the Jewish community in Russia, not least by enforcing laws that forbade ‘antisemitism’. Indeed, even ‘liberal’ Jews in Russia, for all their anti-Putin hatred, admitted that Jews in Russia were left alone to do whatever and pursue any endeavor(unless it was spreading globo-homo propaganda to the young ones or desecrating churches with ‘Pussy Riot’ antics).

Given such pro-Jewish measures on the part of Putin’s government, one would think most Jews around the world would have made peace with Russia. Many of the richest people in Russia are Jews. Jews are protected and lead affluent lives and have many opportunities. Putin’s government denounces ‘antisemitism’ and goes hard against anyone who dares to threaten or attack Jews. This Being-Nice-to-Jews approach is especially remarkable given that many of the most ruthless Bolsheviks were Jews(who went about attacking Russia’s Christian heritage) and many of the greediest gangster-capitalists were Jews(whose supposed ‘shock therapy’ stripped the Russian economy of its assets). To this day, Jews go on and on about how the Nazis confiscated Jewish property, but in fact, Jews stole a lot more from the Russian nation.

Even so, Russia hoped for a compromise and reciprocity between itself and World Jewry. Alexander Solzhenitsyn even wrote a book about Russians and Jews, whereby he called upon both groups to admit to their past wrongs and arrive at mutual understanding. But no matter what the Russian government has done for the Jews in Russia, Israel, and elsewhere, there’s been zero reciprocity from the Jewish Side. As far as most Jews are concerned, the blame was always and entirely with the Russians, whereas the Jews were totally blameless. So, it doesn’t matter if Putin and Russia want to make amends and meet the Jews halfway. No, it must be the Jewish Way all the way, and Russia better just bow down and do as told.

Now, let’s consider the fate of nations and peoples who have totally submitted to all the Jewish demands. Jews make a big deal of Winston Churchill, the British Lion who stood up to the Evil Nazis. Unlike most Europeans who either allied with, surrendered to, or collaborated with the Nazis, the British people refused to appease evil and fought for freedom, or so says the Good War Narrative.

Given this factoid of 20th century British History, one would think that Jewish Power would have done everything to preserve and protect what made Great Britain a special civilization. Indeed, it’s hard to think of a people more cucked to Jewish Power than the British Anglos who support the Jews/Zionists in all their endeavors, like the Ukraine War(or more like the Judeo-Russian War), the recent destruction of Syria, the endless massacres of the Palestinians, and the plan to destroy Iran.

Yet, Jewish Power has done everything to insult, mock, and humiliate the White Britons. Over the years, Jewish Power did everything to push White Nakba or the Great Replacement on Britain. Jews run BBC and cast blacks in historical British/European roles. Even as British Anglos go out of their way to protect Jewish identity, culture, and feelings, British Jews return the favor by degrading and despoiling Historic Britain. Anglos decry as ‘Anti-Semitic’ anything that might offend Jewish sensibilities while Jews exult in Anti-White hatred and Anti-Anglo insults. British Anglos pledge to defend Israel as a Jewish State while Jews in Britain are hell-bent on pushing the agenda of the Afro-Colonization-of-White-Wombs. Negrolatry and GloboHomo, both heavily funded by World Jewry, have become the new cult religions of the Anglos who’ve totally cucked their bodies and souls to the Jews.

What does that tell us? National Socialist Germans were anti-Jewish, and we can understand why the Jews were anti-German. But Iran and Russia aren’t Anti-Jewish, but Jews foam at the mouths with anti-Iranian and anti-Russian hatred. As for the British Anglos, they’ve totally submitted to Jewish Power, but the Jews still go about eviscerating the heart and soul of Historic Britain. It’s like DAMNED IF YOU DO, DAMNED IF YOU DON’T. Jews say that the US didn’t do enough during World War II to stop the Holocaust. Now, Jews complain that the US isn’t doing enough to facilitate the genocide in Gaza.

 Video Link

Video Link

And of course, look at the U.S., perhaps the only country in the world that is more cucked to Jewish Power than the U.K. is. American Politics is a pissing contest of who can suck more semen from Netanyahu’s cock.
Jews have repeatedly said that, after all their troubles in the Old World, they found something like paradise in the U.S. There were no pogroms like in the Pale of Settlement. No forced conversions like in Spain. And of course, nothing like the Holocaust. Given the levels of Jewish success in the U.S.(that was envisioned and built mostly by Anglo-Americans and other white Americans), one would think Jews would have shown gratitude and done everything to maintain the very America that allowed for Jewish freedoms and success.

But, what has Jewish influence wrought on the US? Jews, who still bitch about the Kristallnacht, funded and encouraged mob violence that created a thousand Kristallnachts in 2020 in wake of George Floyd’s death from drug overdose. And given that white cops made ‘blue’ Democratic-dominated cities livable again after the crime epidemic of the Sixties and the Seventies, you’d think these mostly Democratic Jews would lend moral support to the police. Instead, the Jews threw the cops to the wolves of BLM, Antifa, and other ‘woke’ morons just for political expediency: “Hey blacks, Trump’s America is ‘racist’ and killing innocent black men, so go and vote Democratic!”

Via support of mass immigration, Jewish-Americans replaced whites with nonwhites. Via promotion of degenerate GloboHomo as an official cult, Jewish-Americans have replaced Christianity(and natural norms) with Queertianity(and the ‘new normal’). Via sacralization of the Negro, Jewish-Americans have justified endless black-on-white violence, with whites always being the ones to blame. Via Zionist lunacy, Jewish-Americans have gotten the US embroiled in more pointless wars that ended up killing millions and derailing global peace that might have been with the end of the Cold War.

So, what conclusion are we to draw from these manifestations of Jewish Power? Nazi Germany hated the Jews, Russian and Iran sought understanding with the Jews, and the US/UK totally cucked to the Jews. But, Jews have targeted all of them for destruction. A rational person would say the real problem is primarily with the Jews themselves. It reminds me of the Jewish joke about the chimney. No answer can satisfy the question.

https://kolaleph.org/2013/01/16/the-rabbi-is-in-two-men-come-down-the-same-chimney/

Putin sucking up to Netanyahu. Some good it for Russia in lessening Jewish Supremacist hostility.

Let Us Now Bless the Jews... with Tough Blessing - How did 'to bless' come to mean to 'to kiss ass' in regard to Israel in the West?

 

 Video Link

Recently, Tucker Carlson’s interview with Senator Ted Cruz went viral. What grabbed people’s attention, raising alarm in respectable circles but fanning enthusiasm in the alternative/dissident political sphere, of course wasn’t Cruz’s fanboy ruminations about Israel(as that sort of thing is dime-a-dozen among politicians of both parties) but Tucker’s pushback and counter-argument, as well as his refusal to be pigeonholed as an ‘Anti-Semite’.
Over the years, virtually everyone in the so-called Mainstream Media has either nodded along or remained silent upon politician after politician professing their utmost fealty to Israel, Zionism, and Jewish People in general. While Carlson didn’t go far enough, his eagerness to press upon Cruz to explain himself(as beholden to another country) signaled a seismic shift in the political discourse regarding Jewish Power and its impact on US foreign policy.

Even though it was refreshing to watch a popular media personality challenge what passes for conventional wisdom(or an article of faith) among US politicians and deep state operatives on matters pertaining to Israel, there was disingenuousness on the part of Carlson as well as of Cruz. While it’s true that Oozie Cruzie tried to imply that Carlson is an ‘Anti-Semite’, Carlson’s heated response wasn’t entirely convincing. Not that Carlson is indeed an ‘Anti-Semite’ but that the term has lost all meanings, not least because Jewish Power now labels as ‘Anti-Semitic’ just about anything that calls foul on bad Jewish behavior. Now, if ‘antisemitism’ means blaming Jews for everything and/or crediting Jews for nothing positive, most people would agree it’s a bad thing.
But nowadays, Jewish Power has conflated Zionism with Judaism(or Jewishness), and all ‘good’ people are now expected to unconditionally support Israel no matter what it does, such as supporting ISIS in Syria, carrying out genocidal acts in Gaza, bombing civilian targets in Lebanon, and pulling a Pearl-Harbor-style attack on Iran.

Therefore, for Carlson to still be triggered by the accusation(even if only implied) and profess innocence — “No! I’m not an Anti-Semite!” — is rather weak and wussy. Humanity needs to retire that term because it’s been redefined by Jewish Power as an apologist-justification for Jewish Supremacy: “We Jews are the masters of the universe, that’s that, and you goyim better support us or else you’re lowly ‘Anti-Semites’ who must be destroyed like ‘Amalek’.”

But more importantly, it’s disingenuous to speak of Israel merely as a foreign nation or entity when the current US is part of an empire, not a sovereign republic. The US and Israel are joined at the hip, and therefore, even though Israel is technically a foreign nation, it actually functions as the spiritual-imperial center of the Global Western Imperium.

Furthermore, the real power isn’t in Tel Aviv or someplace in Israel but in the Jewish strongholds in the US(and the EU). Without Jewish-American control of the US, there isn’t much that Israel could do. Netanyahu is able to trample all over US politicians because they are beholden to Jewish-American oligarchs and figures of influence across the institutions and industries.
Tucker Carlson must surely know this but is afraid to GO THERE: Addressing the deeper issues of global Jewish Power. It’s less risky to speak of the US vs foreign state Israel, i.e. the US shouldn’t be kicked around by a foreign government, than to speak of how Jewish tentacles reach into every corner of American Power, an undeniable reality that, however, may still be construed as ‘Anti-Semitic’.
By focusing on Zionist Israel, Carlson hopes to evade charges of ‘antisemitism’ by making a distinction between a foreign entity and Jewish Power in general. You see, he’s not talking about THE JEWS but only about a foreign country that happens to be Jewish and exerts an inordinate amount of influence on the US.

But, this is nonsense because Israel on its own couldn’t generate such overarching influence. It does so only because THE JEWs across the West have supported Zionism and used their levers to exert maximum pressure on goy puppet-politicians to do the bidding of the Greater Israel Project.
The dynamic between Jewish Power and the Goy Elites is like the one between the backwoods hillbilly and Ned Beatty’s character in DELIVERANCE. Jewish Power rams its cock into the arse of the goy who squeals like a pig, “Weeeeeeeeeeeeeee, weeeeeeeeeeee.” White goy cucks might as well be called Wee’s. Ted Cruz certainly is a Wee. Whatever comes out of his mouth is just more ‘weeeeeeeeeeee’ with a fat Zionist cock shoved into his cucked Cuban-American arse.

 Video Link

At one point, Cruz accuses Carlson of being ‘obsessed’ with Jews, and of course, it’s pure projection as it is Congress(and all institutions of consequence) that obsessively toes the Zionist line. According to the likes of Cruz, it’s purely natural and normal, not ‘obsessive’, for Congress-creatures to applaud a pathological liar and psychotic murderer like Bibi Netanyahu with 57 standing ovations. But if anyone points out such cases of goy servility to Zion, that’s somehow unhealthily ‘obsessive’.

That said, shouldn’t a supposed liberal democracy be obsessively focused on who has the most power and how it is used? It’s in tyrannies that the people are not supposed to ask questions and merely chant “Heil the Great Leader”. For anything resembling a democracy to function properly, there has to be an open discourse as to which groups are the most powerful and what their agendas are.
Given that Jews are by far the most powerful group in the US(and the West), all of us should be obsessed with it, just like the Jews were once obsessed with what the Anglo-American elites or the WASPs were up to.
If we went on and on about West Virginia hillbillies or Mexicans in Pecos, Texas, now that would be unhealthily obsessive about absolutely nothing. Last I heard, it’s not the hillbillies who run Wall Street, and it’s not small-town Mexicans who run the State Department(and make the US fight Wars for Mexico).
The last thing we should be is passive(than obsessive) about The Power. There’s no point to the US being a democracy if it’s verboten to address the sources and the problems of The Power, which happens to be Jewish/Zionist.

Even though Jewishness, Judaism, and Zionism aren’t the same thing, they’ve become too closely interwoven to the point where one cannot step on the toes of one without stepping on the toes of others as well. It’s true that the majority of Jews are secular, but their ethnic identity is inseparable from Jewish religious conceptions and tradition. While a good many Jews are opposed or indifferent to the idea of Zionism, the overwhelming majority since the end of World War II have supported the project. More importantly, the Jewish Power Elites(who get to call the shots) have overwhelmingly been pro-Zionist, reflected in their influence on both the Democratic Party and the Republican Party(and all across the vassal states of the EU).

Thus, there are times when a certain identity aligns with a certain ideology, when the two become so intertwined that it’s difficult to understand one without the other. This may not be a permanent condition but is nevertheless potent while it lasts. Think of National Socialist Germany in which Hitler’s regime was wildly popular and embodied the collective will of the nation. As long as Hitler was in power, it made little sense to speak of a Germany separate from National Socialism. Same goes for Russia under communism.
As things turned out in the end, there could be Germany without National Socialism and Russia without communism, but while those ideologies lasted, they defined the character and the destiny of entire peoples. Same might be said of Iran as an Islamic Republic.
Likewise, the main thrust of the Jewish collective will and Jewish elite power from the end of World War II until now has been to defend Israel, discredit(and defame) its critics in the West, and to destroy its perceived enemies in any part of the world(not only Iran but countries like Venezuela and North Korea that has working relations with Iran).
Unless Tucker Carlson is willing to address this problem of the Zionist grip on America(and by extension the entirety of the West), he isn’t really being candid on the issue. In the long run, it may well be that the Zionist project will fail and Jews around the world withdraw their support and forge a revised sense of Jewishness untainted by an association with genocidal-supremacist Zion, but that day, if possible, isn’t here yet.

Tucker Carlson isn’t fully convincing in his game of semantics over what constitutes ‘Israel’. True, the meaning of the term in the modern era is different from its meanings in the past. In the strictest sense in our time, it means the nation-state of Israel that was founded in 1948. However, one could construe its existence as the fulfillment of the long-dreamt hope of the Jewish Diaspora to reclaim the lost homeland. In this sense, there is an eternal or ur-Israel even without the nation of Israel as long as the Jewish people exist and keep their heritage and hopes alive. It’s like Poland was wiped off the map by various empires, but the dream of the Polish nation was never extinguished and realized once again following World War I. And even though there is no Kurdish nation-state, one could still speak of Kurdistan of the heart-and-mind. So, one could argue that Israel the nation-state is merely the political manifestation of the long-held Jewish dream of the restored homeland.

Some more theologically inclined types argue that God made the promise to Abraham, not to ‘Israel’, but given that the Jewish Tribe began with Abraham, it doesn’t matter whether it’s called Abrahamic tribe, Jews, Israel, Zion, or whatever. Surely, any people/culture evolves and changes over time — Greece today isn’t exactly the Hellas of long ago — , but there are certain constants that distinguish them from others, and in this sense, one can speak of a continuity from Abraham to Moses to the Jewish Diaspora to the European Jewry(and its rise) to Jewish Americans & Zionism.
So, even if today’s nation-state of Israel would have been inconceivable to Jews of the past, it could be seen as the latest embodiment of the ever-evolving history of the Jewish people. Likewise, would the Chinese of the past have imagined the rise of Modern China(or even have approved of it)? But modern China is a continuation of the Chinese civilization and represents the will or at least approval of the vast majority of the Chinese people.

Besides, one can understand why the nation of Israel and Zionism in general have had a certain appeal to the Christian West. Zionism, despite having developed as a secular-nationalist ideology, compels Jews into a spiritualist frame of mind.
After all, if Jews merely needed a nation-state to call their own, why did it have to be in that part of the world? The only justification is ethno-spiritual, i.e. it has special meaning to the Jews as the Promised Land as granted by God.
The Jewish Diaspora was bound to be problematic to both Western Christians and Western nationalists. To the Christians, Jews were a problematic people who wouldn’t accept Jesus and remained a tribe apart. There was also the matter of Jewish Deicide in Christian theology. As such, Christians and Jews couldn’t have much in common in the West. Despite their shared reverence for the Old Testament, the Christians went in one direction with the New Testament whereas the Jews went in another direction with the Talmud, a kind of lawfare weaponization of the Tanakh.

However, Jews and Christians could make common cause via the Zionist project. For all their differences, they had a shared interest in reclaiming the Holy Land from the Muslims. Christians could also see the project as a means by which Jews would eventually come to Christ, either out of gratitude for Christian support or because of the Second Coming whereupon Jesus would return with something like the Waffen SS and command that all the Jews who convert be spared(and be prepped for Heaven) while all those who don’t be holocausted on the spot to burn in Hell forever.

Especially given that the Jewish Diaspora, at least since the Emancipation, has been associated with rootless cosmopolitanism, liberal decadence, cultural subversion, promotion of sinful hedonism, and/or radical politics, Western Christians found it difficult to find common ground with most modern Jews. Spiritually, Christians and Jews were divided on prophecy. Morally and culturally, Christians(representing the more conservative values of the West) were often appalled by the ‘pornographic’ and irreverent inclinations of the secular Jews.
But via Zionism, Western Christians finally found something to feel excited about in their cooperation with Jews to found a Jewish nation-state. Whatever disagreements existed between Jews and Christians on the divinity of Jesus, they were agreed on the specialness of the Holy Land. If Greeks should reclaim their land from the Ottoman Turks, why shouldn’t the Jews do something similar? Even the secular aspects of Zionism might have been appealing to Christians in an odd way. The idea was that these irreligious Jews, in returning to their ancient homeland, would be so inspired that they would come to God and give up their rootless and decadent ways.

And Western nationalists also saw an advantage in Zionism. Better for Jews to pursue their own nationalism in their own country than stand in the way of goy nationalist aspirations in goy lands. Jews were problematic as tribalists, rootless cosmopolitans, or radical universalists as long as they lived among goyim. Jewish tribalism(or nationalism) could never sync with, say, Polish nationalism, German nationalism, Serbian nationalism, and etc. Jewish rootless cosmopolitanism(especially via Jewish control of media and academia) subverted the identities and culture of goyim. And Jewish radical universalism, most potently expressed through Marxism, threatened to undermine the national sovereignty of goy nations in its mission of world revolution.

Zionism was appealing to goy nationalists because it would remove Jewish Tribalism from the West and transplant it to some place where Jews could do their own thing. Thus, the Jewish plant, instead of contending with goy plants in the goy pot of soil, would be allowed to grow in its own pot(with no bother to the goy plants).

As things turned out, however, the creation of Israel, far from freeing the West of the Jewish Question, burdened it with ever increasing obligations to the Zionist entity. For one thing, Zionism didn’t ‘re-migrate’ most of World Jewry to the Promised Land but only a portion of them, with the rest gaining power in the West and using it to ensure ever increasing Western subordination to Zion.

Of course, the real Promised Land, as far as the Jews were concerned, was America. Even though Jews didn’t have the numbers to conquer it and take it outright(as they did with Palestine), they managed to pull off the next best thing: They made the white elites succumb to Jewish Will, and then all else followed to secure the Jewish takeover of America.
From the Jewish point of view, the US is their New Promised Land while Israel is a symbolic reminder of their humble but audacious beginnings. Even if Jews lost Israel, their global power would be intact. But if they lost America, they’d be in the wilderness again. Thus, in some ways, all this talk of Israel-Israel-Israel serves as a distraction from the true nature of Jewish Power: Its successful colonization of the white elites into cuck-collaborationist Wee’s squealing ‘weeeeeee, weeeeeee’ as the Jews pummel their bungs.

As for Ted Cruz(or Senator Wee), he’s of course full of crap. A total sleazebag who will say and do anything for personal advancement, the only reason he sucks up to Israel is because Jews have the most power and money. Cruz knows that Jews can make or break careers. Chuck Schumer said Donald Trump was foolish to alienate the intelligence agencies that have many tricks up their sleeves, but he might as well have been talking about Jewish Power that has the power of finance, law(fare), media, deep state goonery, gangsterism, and outright thuggery(via groups like Antifa & BLM) to derail just about anyone’s reputation, profession, or simple peace of mind.

Of course, Cruz won’t admit the truth, that he’s just a political whore bought and sold like the rest, and instead spins a fairytale of his childhood years in Sunday School, ROTFL. Right, after all these years in politics as a total sleazebag, the reason for his unbridled support for Israel has something to do with church sermons he heard as a child. Do people still swallow this swill? P. T. Barnum comes to mind.

Surely, if Cruz really cares about Christian ethos, he must have heard something about compassion for humanity as a whole, which would include Palestinian women and children being starved to death or mowed down by IDF death squads. Where in the New Testament does it say, “Thou shall support Jews in their bloodlust and give unto them all the necessary tools to wipe out other tribes deemed as subhuman Amalek”? Where does it say, “Blessed are the Jews who starve Arab Christians” or “Feed the fat Jews and starve the famished Palestinian children”? Or “Supply Jews with endless bombs signed with your names to turn Palestinians into pieces of meat”? No matter how one interprets the New Testament, there is no way any real Christian can justify what the Zionists have done to Gaza.

Now, let’s play a game. Let’s take Ted Cruz at his word and pretend that he and his ilk are utterly sincere in their convictions about Israel, i.e. they truly do believe that those who bless Israel will be blessed(presumably by God, though these days, Jews, along with homos and Negroes, seem to be bigger than god). And let us agree, for the sake of argument, that the proposition carries validity. Those who bless Israel or the Jews shall be blessed in turn. And those who curse Israel or the Jews shall be cursed in turn.

That said, we need to define the meaning of ‘to bless’. Surely, it doesn’t mean a mindless, unthinking, naive, childlike, imbecilic, and unconditional endorsement of whatever Jews do. Why, that would mean Jews are PERFECT, tantamount to saying they are god(s), because, after all, only God is perfect. That would be blasphemy, to posit that Jews are as perfect as God Himself.
If Jews are humans, there’s no way they can be perfect, which means they are capable of sin and horrible crimes. Even as the Chosen of God, Jews would still be human and would have all the human flaws(and would be tainted by the Original Sin and the Mark of Cain).

Therefore, goyim’s obligation to the Jews should be both supportive and critical. Admire Jews when they do good, admonish them when they do bad. Otherwise, if to-bless-the-Jews means to favor them and praise them regardless of the issues, that’s more canine mentality than human mindset. Only dumb dogs suck up to their master no matter what he does, no matter how lousy he is.
If God gifted us with the heart and mind(or the soul) as the source of our moral compass, then we’re obligated to use it, even against those we love, admire, or are partial to for whatever reason. Just because we admire a certain movie actor or athlete doesn’t mean we’re obliged to defend whatever he does. Just because we appreciate a certain teacher or thinker doesn’t mean we must praise whatever he says or does. Just because a parent loves his or her child doesn’t mean he or she has to always shower the kid with treats and never ever punish him. The best kind of love is tough love, and the best kind of admiration is tough admiration, which means the best kind of blessing is tough blessing.

So, even if the Bible says that the Jews are special, it doesn’t mean they’re entitled to be immune from criticism and judgement. As Jews are humans and not divine(as only God and Jesus, at least according to Christians, are divine), they are just as imperfect as the rest of us. In a family, the parents may favor one kid over the others: The kid is smarter, has a likable personality, and/or possesses good looks; or, the kid gets more sympathy because of frailty or special needs. Whatever the reason, it still doesn’t mean the special kid is perfect and incapable of doing really foolish, even foul, things.

So, if we must bless the Jews, what does it really mean? Does it mean to turn off our hearts and minds(or our moral compass) and blindly endorse whatever the Jews do regardless of the harm it may cause to certain groups, not least ourselves? Must we ‘bless’ the Jews even when they carry out genocide in Gaza, do a sneak attack on Iran, promote anti-white hatred, or push White Nakba(or the Great Replacement) on the West?

Or does it mean to press upon the Jews to live up to their spiritual and moral duties of chosen-ness. If indeed Jews(and certain types of Christians) really do believe that the People of Abraham are special and gifted by God with the mission to be an inspiration to all mankind, then it seems that ‘to bless the Jews’ impels us to remind them when they act badly and lead them back toward the righteous path, as indeed Jesus did at times, especially with the money-changers at the gates of the Temple. In other words, the Tough Blessing is the only true blessing. Unconditionally blessing the Jews no matter what they do is to assume that they are god and beyond the moral laws of man. Also, it misunderstands the essence of what it means ‘to bless’.

‘To bless’ implies a degree of authority. In other words, God blesses mankind than the other way around. Those higher above bless those below. So, Jesus blesses us, and we receive His blessing and try to live by His teachings. It would rather be presumptuous for us to bless Him as He is the Son of God and doesn’t need our endorsement.
True, ‘to bless’ has multiple meanings, and an inferior can bless the superior in the sense of praising or glorifying the powerful. But more often than not, blessings are conferred by the superior unto the inferior. And so, traditionally, the child sought the blessing of the parent, especially the father, for the wedding, like in THE FIDDLER ON THE ROOF. Or the priest blesses a marriage. Or a home.

And, blessings are never unconditional. In the Bible, God blesses a people or individuals based on their merit. A proper priest will bless a marriage as a moral union of man and woman, not some polygamous union of orgiasts and certainly not a homosexual union(though, in our sick times when Christianity has ceased to be a conservative value system, plenty of clergymen/women will do just that in conformity to what Jewish Power deems as the New Normal). And a home will be blessed if it will be used as a place for virtue. What priest would bless a whorehouse, a meth lab, or a gambling den run by hoodlums?
In other words, to bless requires moral compass, integrity, discernment, and judgement. It makes no sense to bless someone or something for all times for all excuses. To bless and to curse are two sides of the same coin. When people do right, they deserve to be blessed; but when they do wrong, they deserve to be cursed.

Now, there’s the stupid meaning of ‘to curse’ that is the flipside of the stupid meaning of ‘to bless’. To unconditionally curse someone or something is as retarded as to unconditionally bless someone or something.
But then, that is exactly the state of affairs in the current cucked West: Unconditional blessing of Jews/Israel and unconditional cursing of Palestinians/Iranians. Even when Jews do terrorism, it must be defended. Even when Palestinians and Iranians use justified violence against Zionist horrors, it’s called ‘terrorism’. Even when Israel does a sneak attack with acts of terror in Iran, it’s deemed ‘defending itself’, but when Iran retaliates with missile strikes, it’s a bunch of Islamofascists attacking the blessed state of Israel.
In other words, Jews are right even when they do wrong, whereas Palestinians/Iranians are wrong even when they do right. Always bless the Jews/Israel no matter what they do, and always curse the Palestinians/Iranians even when they’re justified.
After Israel’s unprovoked surprise attack on Iran, the entire West not only sided with Israel but the US dropped bombs on Iran, all the more outrageous considering Israel has lots of nukes whereas Iran never had them. Both the art of blessing and the art of cursing in the West are completely without moral compass.

To properly bless someone or something also implies the need to curse him or it when necessary. No matter how special a student may be, the teacher isn’t obligated to grade everything he does with A+. If the student slacks off and does poorly, he must expect C’s and D’s. No matter how much a critic appreciates a certain author or artist, he isn’t obligated to praise every work. The critic’s duty is to ‘bless’ what is worthy and to ‘curse’ what is unworthy.

But, moral criticism has gone out the window in regard to the Jews, rather ironic since Jews have been among the most critical people, always finding faults(even imagined at times) in other groups. The taboo of ‘antisemitism’ has somehow convinced many in the West that Jews are always deserving of unconditional support, praise, and ‘blessing’.
Even when one disapproves of the agendas pushed by Jews, the ‘correct’ thing is to blame anyone or anything but the Jews — it’s the ‘leftists’, ‘globalists’, ‘Soros & gang’, ‘neocons’, or whatever — while seeking out those Jews, however small in number, with whom you share common interest. So, if nine out of ten Jews want to bash your head in, don’t mention their Jewishness, but if the one Jew wants to shake your hand, make a big deal of his Wonderful Jewishness.
Notice most Jews are anti-conservative and anti-white, but the white cuck dogs of the GOP emphasize their happy partnership with the ultra-Zionists. (Of course, the ultra-Zionists are no less hostile to white goyim and only exploit the craven cucks, i.e. whites sprinkle holy water on Jewish identity while Jews urinate on white identity.)

Curses must accompany the blessings. Indeed, it’s the way of none other than God. God’s blessings on the Jews came with conditions that they follow the righteous path. If not, God cursed them until they atoned for their transgressions to regain His grace. If God’s blessings on the Jews are unconditional, it would imply the Jews are equal to God or even superior.

According to the likes of Ted Cruz, God sees no fault in the Jews and blesses them unconditionally, which requires the goyim to do likewise. But is unconditional blessing really a blessing, or is it submission? When a dog reveres and obeys its master, is it ‘blessing’ him? In actuality, the dog doesn’t know any better than to submit and do as told. In contrast, ‘to bless’ implies a degree of judgement. If to bless something means to appreciate its worth, it assumes the mental acuity to do so, to gauge the value of something. To praise, one must first appraise. One must be able to tell real gold apart from fool’s gold, real diamond from imitation glass. In other words, blessings aren’t conferred blindly.

Even if Christians argue there’s nothing for us to think about and we should bless the Jews simply because God in the Bible says so, aren’t they cognizant of the fact that God’s blessings upon the Jews is conditional and judgmental, i.e. His blessing could be withdrawn temporarily(or even permanently) if Jews wander off the righteous path.
After all, the rise of Christianity was predicated on Judaism having met its expiration date, whereupon the New Israel comprised those who accepted the divinity of Jesus Christ as the Messiah and Son of God. Indeed, what would be the point of the NEW Testament if self-professed Christians defer to the OLD Testament for the final word on the most important matters? Whatever God had promised to Abraham, at least according to the New Testament, culminated in the New Covenant offered to all mankind through the figure of Jesus. The New Testament says that Christians, in order to be blessed, must accept Jesus as the Messiah. It does away with the idea that mankind may find favor in the eyes of God through the Jews, an Old Testament tale.

Still, even if we were to look to the Old Testament as a guide to to-bless-or-not-bless, it’s clear that God never blessed the Jews unconditionally. Also, when Jews gained favors from other tribes or kingdoms, it was on the basis of give-and-take. Goy kingdoms or empires were nice to the Jews because the latter was of some service to them.

Then, even if we were to agree with Ted Cruz and the Old-Testament-Christians that we must bless the Jews, it must be done judiciously, critically, and morally. We must confer Tough Blessing upon the Jews. Just as love isn’t all hugs-and-kisses but rebukes-and-reprimands when, say, friends or family members go astray, blessings mustn’t entirely consist of praise and support but also criticism and denunciation when wrongs are committed.
Criticism is a kind of blessing for it presses upon people to see the wrongfulness of their ways and atone for what they’ve done. History says that World War II was the ‘good war’ because the ‘good guys’ not only beat the ‘bad guys’ but redeemed them from the ashes of defeat and restored them to the brotherhood of man. In that sense, one could argue that the defeats of Germany and Japan, though traumatic and ignominious, were a kind of blessing as those countries were exorcised of the evils of supremacism and militarism.

Then, the same goes for Jewish Power that has grown arrogant, supremacist, and megalomaniacal. It has become cancerous, and the proper way to tough-bless the Jewish People is to name this disease and remove the tumor so that they may be rid of the sickness of tribal megalomania.
In other words, our blessing must be conditional and critical, in the manner of God in the Old Testament who, when infuriated with the Jews, bitch-slapped them around some until they stopped acting like Ron Jeremy sucking his own cock.

People like Ted Cruz and Tom Cotton confuse ‘to bless’ with ‘to kiss-ass’. Their message to goyim is to turn off the mind, forget morality, and forsake judgement. Just believe on faith that Jews are good, great, awesome, and wondrous in every way, and everything they do is magic(like in the Police song). Everything Jews do is magic, and we should be like silly children or dumb dogs fawning over the latest policy proposal cooked up by Netanyahu, Mark Levin, or Ben Shapiro.

Video Link

Let us ‘bless’ or kiss-ass everything they do. They want to drop bombs on apartment blocks and kill everyone? Kiss-ass the Jews. They send snipers to target Palestinian children? Kiss-ass the Jews. They blow up every hospital in Gaza? Kiss-ass the Jews. They blow up every school in Gaza? Kiss-ass the Jews. They laugh at the plight of Palestinians? Kiss-ass the Jews. They lure Palestinians to food centers and mow them down with machine guns? Kiss-ass the Jews. They prevent aid from getting in and let untold numbers of Palestinians die of starvation, thirst, and disease? Kiss-ass the Jews. Appeasing Jews, the centerpiece of what Western Civilization is all about.
So, according to John Hagee and Mike Huckabee, those are the kind of horrors we must ‘bless’ or kiss-ass in order to win favors from God? And all this time, we thought that the evolution of Yahweh was a moral advancement from the crude gods of Babylon that demanded child sacrifice.

The true meaning of ‘to bless’ implies a degree of authority and agency on the part of those who do the blessing, but there isn’t a hint of such among the Christard-cucks who believe that blessing-the-Jews means serving as flunky apologists for whatever Jewish Power cooks up nest, even if it means engineering a genocide of an entire people in Gaza or elsewhere.
Even when white conservatives oppose mass immigration(mainly pushed by Jewish organizations), they feel obligated to frame the argument in defense of Jews. You see, all those darky/brown immigrants aren’t as fawning and deferential to the Jews as white dog cucks are. “We blanka hundos serve the Jewish Master like no other bunch of goyim do, woof woof.”

It’s all so ridiculous. Throughout their history, Americans have been admiring of peoples and cultures around the world but never unconditionally. Americans have found much to praise in the virtues, values, and achievements of other nations, be it Germany, France, Japan, Russia, Mexico, Egypt, India, and so on. But Americans also noted much that was bad and ugly among the nations of the world. Even Great Britain, the mother country of the US Republic, was both an object of reverence and rebuke.

At some point, however, in regard to the Jews, the US went totally ape-shit in unconditional servility, all the more troubling as it goes against the defiant spirit of Americanism, the cowboy thing. Americans staked their pride in the revolution that rejected monarchy in favor of freedom, national autonomy, and individual agency, but they now look upon Jews as their god-emperor.
Americanism maintains that Americans should be free to speak their minds, criticize any power, name any abuse, and also keep the government free of theological dogma & tyranny, the kind that burned people at the stake for blasphemy in the Old World.

But now, all we hear from the ruling elites, even tough-sounding Trump, is that we must kiss-ass the Jews, suck Zionist toes, and trample on the Constitution itself to forbid ‘antisemitism’ that, in the current socio-political climate, can mean just about any criticism of Jewish Supremacism.
Even though Jewish Power is clearly in gangsterist, supremacist, imperialist, and genocidal mode, it is ‘Anti-Semitic’ to say so. And conscientious Jews who expose and excoriate the Jewish sickness are tarred-and-feathered as ‘self-loathing Jews’, which would imply that the only way to be a proper Jew is to support the madness of Netanyahu and his deranged cohorts. If you support Jewish supremacist evils, you are a good goy. If you denounce Jewish supremacist evils for the sake of larger humanity, you’re an ‘Anti-Semite’.

I have a better way. Let us bless Jews in a more sensible way that is good for them and for us. Let us bless them with tough-reminders of what it means to be moral citizens of the world. Let us bless them with sermons against targeting women and children. Let us bless them with condemnation of genocide regardless of who does it, Jews or Germans. Let us bless them with demands that the Jewish people reject supremacism and bring the likes of Netanyahu to justice. Let us bless the Jews with lectures on the US Constitution, i.e. it’s not okay for Jews to use lawfare to distort American laws in service to the Jewish supremacist project. Let us bless the Jews by awakening them to their hypocrisies, i.e. elevating the Holocaust into a new religion while supporting far-right Nazi-type elements in Ukraine and aiding-and-abetting Islamic terrorists to bring down governments while warning the West about the threat of Jihadism. Let us bless the Jews with the ideal that the mass media are supposed to serve as the Fourth Estate, not the extension of the Deep State committed to serving Global Zion. Let us bless the Jews with the rules of honor that would surely damn as perfidious the use of surprise attack(along with terrorist acts) by Israel against Iran. Let us bless the Jews with the hypothesis that if Anne Frank came back to witness the horrors in Gaza, she would weep. Let us bless the Jews with the irony that even a semi-retard like Greta Thunberg knows a genocide when she sees one while so many well-educated Jews are still making excuses for Israel, now Diseasrael.

And we can go on and on. If we are in the position to bless the Jews, it means we must also pass judgement on them and curse them out when they do bad. Cursing the bad is the flipside of blessing the good; they go hand in hand. Otherwise, it’s not really an act of blessing but of ass-kissing, which is what the US and the West are really about in regard to Jewish gangsterism turned most foul.

Power works like chemistry, and the greatest evil in the world has resulted from the compounding of Jewish Supremacy and White Submission. Jewish Supremacy on its own couldn’t do much, and White Submission(or Cuckery) on its own would be rather aimless. It’s like a man alone isn’t much and neither is a horse alone. But put a man on a horse, and he can conquer the world.
When Christianity dominated the West, both Jews and goyim had to give up something to meet one another halfway. Goyim would worship the God of the Jews but through the figure of Jesus, the King of Kings. And if Jews fully wanted to be part of the Goy Order, they would have to convert and become fellow Christians. Thus, Jesus would serve as the glue between the Jews and goyim. Same was true of communism, whereby the goyim would submit to the prophecy of Karl Marx the Awesome Jew while the Jews would abandon their tribalism and become comrades with the rest of humanity.
As for Zionism, it began as a nationalist project for the Jews — Jews would have a nation to call their own, like various European groups had their own nations, and Jews would mind their own business in their own nation — , but that original appeal to the goyim faded as Zionism morphed into the basis for Global Zion, whereby Israel wouldn’t merely be a nation for the Jews but the quasi-spiritual center of the Empire of Judea(that took possession of the US as its jewel in the crown).
Thus, the idea of midway compromise between the Jews and the goyim was tossed to the wayside, and incredibly enough, the universal theme in the West became the all-pervasive goy obligation to bless the Jews(who only bless themselves): Surrender everything to the Jews who, in turn, feel no obligation to concede on anything. Thus, Christianity went from a midpoint compromise between goyim and Jews to a mass cult whereby the goyim would effectively replace Jesus Christ with the Chosen-ness of Jews(that trumps all other considerations, with much of the New Testament now deemed ‘Anti-Semitic’). The fusion of Jewish Supremacism and White/Christian cuckery is surely the most dangerous development in the 21st century. All the major wars and conflicts of the new century have been its product.