Two Kinds of People in Current Political Culture: The Easies and the Hards

 

If Pope Francis doesn’t want to judge, why not join a disco than a church? Religion exists to judge, and Christianity is a judgmental religion. If he doesn’t want to judge, he should find a new ‘faith’ or some hobby. But then, Francis really does love to judge. He loves to judge and condemn traditionalists for refusing to bow down to the latest fashions of degeneracy.

1. It has gone from so-called ‘gay rights’ to Gay Rites, a ‘neocracy’ of globohomo-mania as a new object of reverence, rapture, and worship. While the West is becoming irreligious(in the waning of traditional faith), there’s a neo-theocracy or ‘neocracy’ of satanism with Sodomania and Tranny-scendence as the highest value, along with Magic Negro Cult and Holy Jew Worship. Idolatry is the new faith, with its adherents foaming at the mouth in their faddish fanaticism.

From its inception to around the new millennium, the ‘gay’ agenda was marketed as a secular and ‘rational’ movement in favor of individual rights, i.e. some individuals are homo, and they have rights as individuals to practice homo-fecal-penetration and be what nature made them to be.
But then, the ‘gay’ agenda(or globohomo or queertianity) became the official policy of statism: Government and politicians must either observe, celebrate, and praise homosexuality OR keep their mouths shut if deficient in requisite enthusiasm. At the very least, they must NOT oppose the agenda as it would displease the Jews who control both political parties, big media, and the deep state. Finally, we now see globo-homo nuttery being pushed into houses of worship. We’ve reached the point where the hope of American ‘conservatives’, Donald Trump, proudly hosted a ‘gay wedding’ at his estate Mar-a-Lago with almost no pushback from the weeny MAGA base.
The Agenda is no longer secular but neo-theocratic or ‘neocratic’. Indeed, given its success, it’s past being an agenda and is the de facto state religion of the ruling elites who’ve replaced Jesus with the Jewish-promoted homo anus as the holiest symbol of civilization.
In our time, churches and temples fling their gates wide open to the worship of satanism. And Jews turned the Holy Land into Sodom and Gomorrah, and we must praise the fact that Israel annually(and anally)has one of the biggest ‘gay’ parades in the world. Furthermore, even non-homo things now seek blessing via ‘christening’ or ‘limp-wristening’ via globo-homo symbolism/ritualism. Want to make your dog or sports team more special? Wrap it in globohomo colors.

Sign says ALL ARE WELCOME but of course decent people who refuse to celebrate Homo-Fecal-Penetration and Tranny-Penis-Cutting are NOT welcome in this neo-satanist church gone rotten. More like All Are Well-Cum.

2. Jews were the main force behind globo-homo. Anyone who denies this fact is either ignorant, dishonest, or cowardly. It was a ploy by which Jews reinforced minority-elite-supremacism. As homos are minorities all around the world, any society that puts homos on a pedestal effectively ends up favoring the minority over the majority. It complements Jewish minority-supremacist power. People who bow down before minority-homos are made more likely to bow down before minority-Jews. Also, as homos are alienated from their own societies, they make ideal fifth-column collaborators of Jewish Globalist Power. Jewish Power coddles and bribes them, and they do the bidding of the Empire of Judea.

Welcome to Anno Sodomini

3. Jews hated Christianity for historical reasons — ‘antisemitism’ and the smuggling of the Jewish God to the goyim — and ideological reasons, as the Church remained the bastion of conservative values. The church was, at one time, the main force against globo-homo and other forms of decadence, depravity, and degeneracy, often pushed by Jews.
Jews figured on two ways to deal with the challenge. Bring down the church and discredit it with salacious scandals, mocking caricatures, and secular arguments. Or change it from the inside. Turn the church into a manger for globo-homo, thereby eroding any effective force against the ‘gay’ agenda, especially as secular ‘conservatives’ only cater to power and money, sucking up to anyone on top — notice that once rich Jews told GOP to stop opposing globo-homo, ALL Republicans followed suit.
Jews know that christianity gone globo-homo is spiritually dead. No sane religion celebrates sodomy and tranny-penis-cutting in its houses of worship. The fact that so many people(especially ‘educated’ people) in the West will approve of christianity ONLY IF it embraces the ‘gay’ agenda is proof that they put sodomy and tranny-vanity over God and Jesus. They don’t expect homos and trannies to repent and atone before God and Jesus(and Allah and Muhammad). Instead, they expect Divinity to bow down to the fad-fanaticism of the day. In other words, divinity now exists to flatter the deviancy of sexual perverts.

Jewish Satanism and Homo Vanity demands that the Christian God and Jesus cater to the narcissism of sexual deviancy.

4. The character of any institution is ultimately decided more by personnel than principles. There is nothing in the teachings of Christianity that would celebrate sinners and sodomy. Jesus opened His heart to everyone, even murderers and rapists, but on condition that they seek repentance and redemption.
So, all this globo-homo stuff has nothing to do with church doctrine or principles. But then, the fate of any institution is decided by its members. If satanists take over the church, it will become satanist even if it remains nominally Christian and features frescos of Jesus on the wall. If capitalists take over a communist government, it will practice capitalism. If communists take over a capitalist industry, they will run it along communist lines. If the Supreme Court is taken over by radicals or Jewish supremacists, it will do away with free speech, gun rights, and freedom of assembly EVEN IF those are guaranteed in the Constitution.

People of Power(POP) decide, not core principles. So, if the Catholic church is taken over by globo-homo types, it becomes effectively ‘sodomitic’ regardless of the church doctrine since time immemorial. Then, it’s no wonder that ‘muh constitution’ types are benighted and clueless. They believe laws and policies are secured by principles. No, it’s the Power that decides. Jews took over US institutions and used their power to shut down BDS, suppress free speech, persecute political enemies, and promote Zionic supremacism, all of which don’t flow from the Constitution but are nevertheless enforced because Jews got the power to favor lawfare over the rule of law. They even passed ‘gay marriage’ through the Supreme Court. Where is that in the Constitution? Where does it say marriage can be redefined to accommodate and flatter sexual deviancy and perversion? (Using SCOTUS logic, incest or same-family marriage should also be allowed.) People of Power or POP can just pull stuff out of the thin air or out of their arse. It’s like Stalin had the power to make a pact with Hitler even though it went against communist principles. In this sense, fascism has a better understanding of how power really works. Power itself is the ‘principle’ of history.

5. If the masses were at odds with the elites, the People of Power or POP would have more difficulty doing as they please. In other words, even if all the institutions were pro-homo, the Power would be up against popular opposition to the agenda(of something like ‘gay marriage’). Popular will, however, especially in the age of mass media and public education, is a plaything for the People of Power who churn out the pop culture that selects and favors certain issues and agendas and, furthermore, decides which images and idols shall colonize the mass mind. Jews have control over mass culture and pushed ‘gay’-as-angel iconography to the masses. As most people are sheeple, they fell for it like children fall for Santa. So, Jews got elite power and control mass-passion, or ‘massion’.
Similarly, on the eve of the Cultural Revolution, Mao had the authority and means to whip the young ones into mass hysteria. In the West, Jews got the Stalin-or-Mao-like power. No wonder then that conzos usually caved and resigned themselves to “Muh Israel” and “Gay Marriage is now a conservative value.”

6. There are two kinds of people. The Easies and the Hards. The Easies are push-overs. Easily molded by public education, advertising, fads & fashion, state propaganda, and political correctness. Most ‘liberals’ today are Easies. They are so easy to influence, so receptive to the latest manias. They are trusting of elite institutions, status-conscious, and conceitedly partial to anything packaged as ‘new’, ‘radical’, ‘hip’, ‘cool’, and/or pro-‘social justice’.
So, if the Power says a man can be a ‘she’ or even a ‘they’, the Easies go along without thought(or what masquerades as thought with rote slogans and pseudo-intellectual jargons). As even plenty of higher-IQ ‘liberals’ have fallen for the scam, Easiness is less a matter of IQ than of self-sense and conviction. Easies have weak individual sense, racial consciousness, core values, and/or awareness of culture/roots. If at least one’s disconnect from roots and core values was compensated with a strong sense of individuality and criticality, one would be so easy to manipulate. As a free thinking individual, he would be skeptical and keep asking questions. At the very least, he won’t fall for every fad and fashion out of anxiety or approval because he would trust himself to search for the answers.

Unfortunately, today’s so-called ‘liberals’ not only have been uprooted but denied individuality and criticality, rendering them so ‘easy’ to any fad/fashion. Devoid of true individuality, they latch onto the judgmental emotionalism of PC. ‘Easy’ connotes tolerance, taking-it-easy, and live-and-let-live attitude(the kind in the movie DAZED AND CONFUSED), but today’s Easies are instantly ‘triggered’ by whatever that doesn’t jibe with their indoctrination and ‘idolatration'(the process of instilling idol-worship).
The so-called ‘wokeness’ is a contradictory phenomenon. Ideologically, it is flimsy and keeps mutating into ever sillier formulations. And yet, its minions are among the most puritanically rabid. How could they be SO SURE about an ‘ideology’ or idol-driven-ideology(or ‘idology’) that is changing all the time, often contradicting itself, and/or going from one outrage to another at breakneck speed? One moment, the all-consuming outrage is over ‘those poor immigrants’. Next, NOTHING matters more than the celebration of ‘gays’. Then, it’s all about the Noble Negroes and ‘systemic racism’, as if those issues must command our attention 24/7/365. Then, it’s about trannies. Then, it’s Me-Too and feminism(even though the ‘liberal’-dominated pop culture has pornified womanhood).
People who once would have scoffed at the notion of Bruce Jenner as a ‘woman’ are suddenly SO SURE that he is one, and YOU BETTER AGREE or else you’re a ‘transphobe’ who must be fired, purged, and blacklisted. So much conviction with so little consistency. How could this be?

It’s because ‘wokeness’ is essentially amnesiac. It instills people with a righteous sense of outrage but without roots/heritage and/or individuality/criticality. Conservatives argue for roots/heritage, for values with deep historical and spiritual pedigree. Classical liberals and libertarians argue for a strong sense of individuality. ‘Wokeness’ rejects both(as ‘reactionary’ or ‘uncommitted’) and calls for Collective Outrage over the latest ‘injustice'(to be selected by the Power). ‘Woke’ minions are game for such nonsense because they have weak roots and weak sense of self. (Their trashy narcissism and vanity are not to be confused with a strong sense of individuality that doesn’t require constant flattery from others for validation. The whole insistence on pronouns among the gender-looney suggests a pathological lack of confidence that needs to be assuaged by forcing others to comply with their delusions. As for normal-sexual people who go along with this charade by listing their all-too-obvious pronouns — he/him or she/her — , it’s a sign of their ideological vapidity, always eager for confirmation and approval from the powers-that-be.) The ‘woke’ are neither like Patrick Buchanan(strong roots) nor Ayn Rand(powerful individuality).

However one may feel about Buchanan, he undoubtedly has a deep sense of tradition and heritage to lend meaning to his life. Whatever one thinks of Ayn Rand, she believed in the power of the individual to think for himself/herself. She refused to agree with anyone for the sake of acceptance or approval.
Lacking either quality, the ‘woke’ minions harbor outrage than true passion. Theirs is a fashion-passion of amnesia conforming to the latest fads. Like a swarm of locusts carried by ever shifting winds, the ‘woke’ fall upon and feed on whatever field of outrage they’re flung into.

Since the late 1980s, Political Correctness molded generations that are not only ‘Easy’ but Queasy, i.e. easily molded by the powers-that-be into feeling queasy about whatever deemed ‘incorrect’ or ‘unacceptable’. They are the neo-puritans as the current ‘woke’ ideology(or ‘idology’) is actually more a mindless idolatry of Jews, homos, and blacks, thus a kind of Tri-Supremacism.

If Political Correctness in its vanguard role mandated what mustn’t be said, ‘wokeness’ in its overarching mission is to decree what must be said(or chanted in unison).

It should be obvious by now that ‘wokeness’ isn’t truly leftist, egalitarian, or progressive. It is about the supremacism of Jews and whatever Jews prefer uber alles. PC-addled Easy-Queasies are like dogs. Notice dogs can be made to bark and bite at ANYTHING by their master. A dog that is gentle with a rabbit can be instantly made to tear it to pieces. A dog’s agency is always outsourced to its master. Its emotion of servitude to the master overrides all other considerations. Even though most Jews claim to be ‘liberal’, they themselves are not easy-queasy. If anything, they push the Easy-mentality on the goyim because, deep down inside, they themselves are Hard-minded about their own tribal identity and interests. Jewishness is hardcore tribal supremacism wrapped in ‘liberal’ clothing.

The Easy-Queasies hate the Hards. If Easies have clay-minds readily molded by Jewish Hands, the Hards are hard-hats, tougher to crack. Some are hard due to a rather dogmatic rootedness in heritage or tradition. People like Buchanan are true Catholics with a deep sense of church history and values. They won’t cower to the latest fad or outrage for approval from the ruling class and the easily swayed mobs.
Others are hard for reasons of individual pride. They believe that right-or-wrong and good-vs-bad must be a matter of individual reasoning and conviction. It shouldn’t be decided by popular outrage or political pressure. These individuals may disagree with one another, but each of them is Hard in that he is resolved to reason things out for himself than bow to pressure from above or below(or from their peers).

No wonder Jewish Power values the Easies and detests the Hards. Easies are easy to control, whereas the Hards have their own ideas rooted in tradition or individuality.

Of course, there are Hard-Tards as well, such as moronic Creationists or the ‘god hates fags’ crowd who simply refuse to honestly grapple with the science of evolution or homosexuality. Being dogmatic or stubborn for the hell of it isn’t a good way to be Hard.
There are also the Hard-Lards, those who seem to be Hard but are actually all talk and no walk. All those ‘right-wing’ talk show hosts sure talk big but usually fold when push comes to shove. Donald Trump is hard-lard. He acts and talks tough but usually caves to every fashion and to the Jews who hate him. ‘Muh Israel’.

Generally speaking, Hards are usually better than the Easies, though there are times of emergency when it’s imperative to make the great majority ‘easily’ fall in line or behind some major cause. And even though Hardness is currently more a right-wing or conservative trait, it isn’t necessarily so. In an extremely conservative order, the Easies are the conservative folks, the overwhelming majority, who ‘easily’ fall in line with the reigning dogma and dominant narrative. In such an order, it is the liberal who is hard-minded in his insistence on thinking independently or listening to the views, ideas, and narratives from sources disapproved by the authority. While most conservatives in such an order ‘easily’ stick to the supposedly tried-and-true(or traditional), the liberal takes on the harder and more difficult challenge of thinking outside the box.

In the current order, however, conservatives face the harder challenge and more difficult path. Granted, one could argue that true liberals face the hardest task as the current order is far from liberal(in the genuine sense) and really operates on establishmentarian dogmatism. For example, acknowledging that homosexuals exist and letting them do their own thing is liberal. But elevating homos and trannies on a pedestal as the favored idols/icons of society and then ‘canceling’ or blacklisting anyone who doesn’t go along is NOT liberal, though it’s often called that(or ‘leftist’, which is ludicrous). Glenn Greenwald, more or less a true liberal, defends free speech against both the Democrats and Republicans(who, for all their kvetching about Cancel Culture, will easily censor or blacklist anyone who displeases the Zionists whom the GOP caters to for more shekels and blessings).

In the current order of rootlessness, degeneracy, and frivolity, most people are ‘liberal’ Easies, or Easy-Queasies given their mental-weaning on ‘wokeness’. They’re NPC clones of Will Stancil or Steven Bonnell(aka Destiny). If liberals of the past in a conservative order had to make an effort to think and live freely, today’s so-called ‘liberals’ are herd-critters who stampede from one fad to the next, from one outrage to the next. They are so easily led by the nose(which may explain the popularity of nose-rings).
If conservatives in a conservative order ‘easily’ stuck with the reigning customs and dogma, in the current order they need to resist and make an effort not to blindly go along with the crowd on the latest craze. Thus, they are, along with true liberals, the Hards in the current order. Of course, the difference between a true liberal and a conservative is that the former is always ‘hard’ in tirelessly resisting the temptation of the Power(of any ideology) to censor and control thought, whereas today’s conservatives could easily turn ‘easy’ if they could have their preferred order. Andrew Torba of GAB, for instance, is now part of the ‘hard’ crowd given the reigning ideology of Jewish Supremacism and its proxy of ‘wokeness’, but, being a theocrat at heart, his Christian-National order, if realized, would make things easy for people like himself while making it hard for everyone else.

WHY JEWS PUSH GAY MARRIAGE – Brother Nathanael

White Americans as Mere EXTENSIONS of Jewish Supremacist Power Than as Free Individuals

Jewish Powerites understand a crucial truth. People tend to be Extensions than Individuals. As a complex domain of social organisms, the human world is more like an ant colony or a bee hive than a random assemblage of lone creatures like tigers or bears. People constantly pick up signals, all the more so in our age of electronic media and gadgets. Every time someone uses ‘my’ device, he or she is being tuned to signals emanating from a center of power/influence. He or she may think, “I’m a free individual with ‘choice'”, but in fact, the possible ‘choices’ are fed into his/her mind through electronic signals.

In a way, people became less individualistic with the rise of radio and TV. Prior to such technologies, everyone in the US did something different on any given night. Some read books(countless different titles) and magazines, some went for social gatherings, some went for a walk, some stared at the moon, and etc. If ANYTHING unified the masses in the US and the West prior to Radio and TV, it was the Bible, which of course was interpreted differently by every reader.
With the advent of the TV, however, countless viewers could be watching exactly the same thing at the same time, the only notable difference being the qualities of TV sets. Despite the ‘participation’ of millions, the programming was decided by just a handful of people, among whom Jews were prominent; they controlled the signals fed into the Collective American Mind.

As the character in A SERIOUS MAN(by Coen Brothers) messes with the TV antennae on the rooftop for better reception of signals from ‘heaven’, he worries that the impact of television, serious in influence but unserious in content, isn’t all for the good of his children. It’s as if the antennae on the roof replaced the fiddler on the roof, a figure of unique folkloric significance.

Still, Jews in general had less to worry about as the Jewish Media Masters were careful not to send signals that might negatively affect Jewish interests. Instead, signals instilled the mass public with the message that one’s moral character is a measure of his/her ‘philosemitism’.
The signals did carry animus, hostility, and hatred far and wide, but they were mostly aimed at whites because Jewish supremacist power needed white submission and obedience, the logical offshoots of white shame, moral paralysis, and self-loathing instilled into white hearts-and-minds via media(and academia). Jewish Powerites needed whites to be in permanent-atonement-and-redemptive mode(for the ‘historical sins’ of ‘racism’, ‘antisemitism’, and etc.) because it could be exploited to steer white thoughts and actions toward serving Judeo-Centric goals. Whites came to think thus: “Because Jews are so good and holy whereas whites are so vile and loathsome, whites must look to Jews for wisdom and guidance and appease them at every turn.”

In a way, libertarianism, especially the kind pushed by Ayn Rand, has been of great advantage to the Jews. Libertarianism served as a loosening agent. First, the bonds that hold a structure together must be weakened; then, the structure can be disassembled piece by piece. That said, the ultimate trick isn’t to break things apart to keep them separate indefinitely. No, they’re taken apart to be used as building blocks for a new structure based on YOUR blueprint.
Libertarianism promised individuality, freedom, and choice for everyone. It was especially useful in disassociating the White Right from its bonds of conservatism. White Conservatism upheld the bonds of heritage and the bonds of race(and of Christianity).

While Americanism(and Western Culture in general) had long been more individualistic than others, it rejected radical individualism. If one had to make a choice between unity/community and division/individuality, the former was almost always prioritized. So, while American Conservatism wasn’t anti-individualist, it put unity before the individual.
Libertarianism was committed to reversing the formula. Among the more moderate libertarians, it was individuality and choice before unity and tradition, but they weren’t necessarily hostile to the latter. Ron Paul belongs to this school. (His is the school of Virtue Libertarianism, the idea that more freedom and individuality will mean more choice and means by which people can make more rational and sensible decisions. More freedom means more opportunity to be good and moral. In contrast, there is the school of Vice Libertarianism that looks upon traditional virtues as ‘square’ & ‘lame’ and believes that the vices will cancel each other out and lead to a kind of natural equilibrium. It might be called the Anton LaVey school of libertarianism. LaVey argued that the problems of gluttony will be solved by another vice, vanity and narcissism, i.e. gluttons, in their desire to be attractive, will naturally control their appetite; but then, what is to be done about the ‘body positivity movement’ that says ‘fat is beautiful’?)

If moderate Libertarians placed individuality before unity(but still valued unity), the radical libertarians were opposed to any kind of unity and heritage. It was all a matter of ‘me and my choice’. It’s no wonder they oppose nationalism that consolidates the organic whole for survival and power. Radical libertarians see such policies as standing between the individual and choice. In their eyes, the evil of Group Interest stands in the way of individuals and their freewheeling options in a borderless world.

At any rate, unbeknownst to most goy libertarians, Jewish elements pushed libertarianism as a means to an end, not as the end itself. Consciously or subconsciously, Ayn Rand and other Jews would have sensed that Jewish Power would grow immeasurably if whites could be made more atomized while Jews maintained their tribal consciousness. Unity generates a gravitational core whereas individuality scatters everything to the winds. The universe is filled with stardust, but stardust remains adrift in the dark. Powerful suns are formed by the gathering of stardust into great concentrations of matter.
No wonder cities have always ruled over the countryside. Cities concentrate power, countryside scatters it far and wide. Even Mao Zedong, who called on his peasant armies to ‘surround the cities from the countryside’, got his education in the cities and, when his side won the war, made sure that the communists controlled the cities with an iron grip.

Paradoxically, city life is more rootless and individualistic, yet power is concentrated there into a singular unity. In contrast, country life is more rooted and communal, but people are smaller in number and separated from one another. Perhaps, city folks are more individualistic because they can take their systemic unity for granted. They live in such an elaborate form of social order that they don’t have to work so hard at basic survival.

At any rate, dimwit goy libertarians thought that individualism was for everyone. Everyone would become deracinated and come to regard himself or herself primarily as an individual, as a ‘me’ or ‘myself’. Everything else — national loyalty, racial identity, religious affiliation, kinship, or etc. — would be secondary or nonexistent. And all groups would move in this direction. Not only whites but Jews, blacks, browns, and the rest.
But just when whites were moving toward individuality at the expense of any other consideration, Jews were playing up the Holocaust Cult, Zionist Ideology, and Yiddish sensibility. Jews were reminded to never forget their Jewish history and unique ALL-TOO-JEWISH suffering. So, even as Jews prized the utility of individualism, it remained within the orbit of unity.
Philip Roth, for example, pursued a highly individualistic literary career, but all said and done, he was steeped in his sense of Jewishness(even truer of David Mamet). Jews were JEWISH individuals, not generic individuals, which is what Jews urged whites to become(like John Updike whose daughters married Negroes).

As for nonwhites, Jews favored varying agendas depending on their relative usefulness or dangerousness to the Tribe. Jews did everything to weaken the identities of Muslims, Asians, Hindus, Latin Americans, and Africans. All immigrant groups had to be thrown into the Melting Pot and mixed with the demographic white base.
And yet, if nonwhites were urged only to be just like whites, ‘generic individuals’, they wouldn’t be of much use to Jews. Indeed, whites and nonwhites as ‘generic individuals’ might come to see eye-to-eye on lots of things. Instead, Jews aimed to use nonwhites against whites. But what kind of useful identity could nonwhites have if they were fully dissolved in the melting pot?
Jews pushed Negative Identity on nonwhites, an identity based on hostility toward whites. Thus, being non-white, be it black, brown, yellow, Hindu, Muslim, or whatever, became less a matter of positive connection to one’s racial or cultural background than a matter of being AGAINST whites.
Blackness, for example, is essentially about being ‘victims of white supremacist racism’. Brownness is mostly about resentment toward the Gringo. And yellowness is about complaining about the ‘model minority’ trope as just another form of ‘white racism’.

While Jews also possess a powerful sense of Negative Identity — “Evil White goyim did pogroms on us and threw us into gas chambers” — , they also have a powerful sense of Positive Identity rooted in history, heritage, and remembrance. In contrast, as most non-white goy groups arrived with weaker cultures and identities, their only identifier is the ‘moral pride’ of being wronged and victimized by White ‘racists’ and ‘supremacists’. It’s like Jews tell Muslims, “Forget about Islam, let your daughters grow up to ‘twerk’ & act like sluts, let your sons ape black rappers, and wave the ‘gay pride’ flag.” So, what would be the meaning of being a Muslim in America? It would be as a member of People of Color who are forever ‘victimized’ by nasty ‘white supremacist Islamophobes’.

As things stand today, Jews have both positive and negative identities, nonwhites have negative identities, and whites have generic identities. Jews have a sense of history and unity(separate from whites) and a sense of moral outrage(in negative opposition to white ‘Anti-Semites’). Non-whites, in their historical/cultural amnesia, lose a sense of who they are and where they came from, and as such, their identities have meaning only in relation to whites: “White racists did us wrong.” Indeed, without their sense of aggrievement in relation to whites, they would hardly know who or what they are.

As for whites, they are worse off as they’re not only deracinated but reviled. Whites are discouraged from looking into their racial, historical, mythical, and spiritual roots. Whites are now utterly post-cultural. When the European past is invoked, it is to willfully misinform whites that Vikings and Romans were black(as Europe was apparently always about ‘inclusion’ and ‘diversity’) OR to remind whites that they’ve been uniquely guilty in some way or for some reason.
Can whites at least be free individuals left alone to do as they please, like the fellas in Richard Linklater’s DAZED AND CONFUSED? No, not even that. Whites are branded with an identity with the reverse moral dynamic of the non-white Negative Identity. If nonwhites define themselves with Moral Pride vis-a-vis whites, whites must define themselves with Moral Shame/Guilt vis-a-vis nonwhites(and Jews of course). Non-whites see themselves as “people who were always wronged by whites”, whereas whites are pressured to see themselves as “people who always wronged nonwhites”. Thus, both non-white identity and white identity lack autonomy and independence.

Jews have a sense of who they are independent of their relation to whites, whereas nonwhites, having far weaker memories, only have a sense of ‘victimization’ under whites, i.e. the Negative Identity of Moral Pride. For whites, there’s the Negative Identity of Moral Shame. As whites aren’t allowed any sense of who they are independent of the rest of humanity — the mantra of ‘Diversity Is Our Strength’ across both North America and Europe has made it taboo for whites to conceive of a world of their own, past, present, or future — , whites have been conditioned to always think of themselves in relation to the Other. Accordingly, there is no whiteness independent of non-whiteness. White Identity is always a function of its relational dynamics with Jews and nonwhites. Because it had long been ‘white supremacist’, it must henceforth be white-subordinate in perpetuity. White minds must obey the Jewish super-mind. White arms and legs must serve the Zionist Empire. White faces exist to be punched by the black fist. White wombs exist to be colonized by black seeds(and those of other races). White industries exist to be shipped to other countries. White history exist to honor other races, especially blacks, e.g. keep believing that the great European figures were black(or would have been a lot cooler if they were black, so let’s pretend).

Of course, all throughout history, whites sometimes trampled on other peoples and vice versa. After all, whites were invaded by the Huns, Moors, Mongols, Arabs, Turks, and etc., and they are currently being invaded by Third World hordes. Whites were also fleeced by Jewish money-lenders, and countless Christian Slavs died at the hands of Jewish Bolsheviks.
But, such thinking is usually verboten. Whites must only dwell on the wrongs they did to others, except of course when in service to Jewish Supremacists. Whites could write off the guilt of having supported Zionist wars on Palestinians, Iraqis, Iranians, Syrians, etc.
That said, when the ‘refugees’ from the Wars for Israel end up on European and American shores, THEN whites must feel shame and guilt for not taking in more of them. When it comes to smashing Arab/Muslim nations, Jews urge white military men to be like ruthless and heartless Nazis. But when the ‘refugees’ come knocking on the doors of the EU and US, the faceless victims suddenly take on the aura of ‘New Jews escaping the holocaust’.

In the 1960s and 1970s, one could believe that Jews preaching Free Speech and youth culture were mainly for a freer and less hung up American on matters such as race, culture, and identity. And yet, what Jews were really doing was using libertarianism to loosen the white bonds of historical heritage and political unity. Once loosened and divided, however, individual whites were to be molded into a new unity, one of servitude and shame than of pride and power.
As for Jews, they sure as hell weren’t going to generic and ‘white bread’, or rootless individuals. (If Jews seemed rootless to goyim, it was because they refused to become rooted to goy cultures. They insisted on rootedness to the much deeper history and identity of their own.)
Once whites were reduced to atomized individuals, the plan was to reconstruct them into a new sense of whiteness, the Negative Identity of Guilt & Shame. And this was to be realized through Political Correctness permeating not only education but entertainment, advertisement, endless social crusades & purges, and ceaseless public announcements.

Jews did it to mold whiteness into an instrument of their Power. Also because Jews sensed that arch-individualism is not natural to humans who are social creatures. After all, there were signs of Christian Revival and the counter-revolutionary Conservative tide in the 1980s after the tumultuous Sixties and the Me-Decade of the Seventies. It was a high water mark for Evangelicals in the post-war era.
Against such trends, Jews concocted Political Correctness, Magic Negro Cult, Globo-Homo, Diversity-mania, and Holocaust Cult as the new secular religions. Jews figured that whites would feel lonely as mere individuals and coalesce into some kind of ‘spiritual’ community. But what kind of community? The kind that is about white pride, Christianity, conservatism, family values, and nationalism? Such was a nightmare scenario for Jewish Supremacism.
If whites were to be steered away from individualism back toward some kind of unity and identity, it had to be one where white sense of worth was predicated on guilt and atonement. Whites feeling good about being white was absolutely unacceptable. Whites could only feel good about atoning at the feet of Jews and blacks, celebrating Diversity, cheering globo-homo, and praising white female race-traitors who go for Afro-Colonization of White Wombs(or ACOWW).

Over time, the Jewish-conceived formula even spread to once conservative American suburbs and small towns. After all, no matter where anyone lived, he had a TV set that emitted signals from Jewish-controlled centers of news, information, and entertainment. As Joe Biden said, Jewish media made America accepting of ‘gay marriage’. All those electronic signals beamed into the eyes and ears of Americans made them regard homos, the proxies of Jewish Power, as ‘angels’ while despising anyone opposed to the ‘gay agenda’ as a subhuman ‘homophobe’, the face of which became the Greensboro ‘church’, which might as well be a Jewish Front(just like all those phony Neo-Nazi groups led by Jewish hucksters).

As such, all those white people turned into mere EXTENSIONS of Jewish Power. Even as goyim today feel themselves to be free and independent, they are bombarded by Jewish electronic signals on a daily basis. The airwaves are essentially mental whips, rods, and leashes. They tell us what is ‘true’ and ‘false’. They work on our emotions. Consider all the stupid white people who were led to believe it is ‘Nazi-like’ to support or enforce border security. Reliant on Jewish-controlled sources for news and opinions, they’re like dogs on a leash. They are like horses with blinders on, constantly goaded with cracking whips.
They flatter themselves as rational individuals, but most of the news they absorb comes from a handful of Jewish-owned-or-controlled conglomerates that work hand-in-glove with the Deep State. Jewish Propaganda and Mind-Control techniques pervade all electronic devices, and even A.I. has been rigged to heed the Jewish playbook. (The devices are like crack pipes. You may own the pipes, but the drugs are supplied by the pushers. You’re owned by the drugs sold by the kingpins.)

If members of the educated class were truly rational and independent, they would be for Free Speech and open discourse, but having been so relentlessly brainwashed and conditioned by Jewish Power, they support speech control and Censchwarzship lest they be ‘triggered’ by something that runs counter to the Official Narrative that defines their lives. Because ‘woke’ virtue rests on whites tirelessly expunging themselves of ‘white guilt’, they prefer censorship to any threat to their worldview. As with Christian sanctimony where obsessive humility is a path to self-righteousness, ‘woke’ self-loathing is perversely life-affirming to many whites who genuinely feel ‘saved’ in their near-worship of the new gods of Holocaustianity, Negrolatry, and Globo-Homo. They got to have their psychological safe spaces.

The preservation of psychological safe spaces invariably leads to unsafe physical spaces. Mind is conflated with matter, as if reality is a projection of subjective wishes. As the effects of BLM have shown, you can’t have both safe spaces for the mind and safe spaces for the body. If the mind, especially the elite mind, shuts out reality in favor of fantasy, the ensuing policies can only do harm, eventually forcing society to learn the hard way.
So many whites feel psychologically ‘safe’, secure and justified, with the conceit of the Magic Negro and the scapegoat of ‘racism’ or ‘white supremacism’. They hiss and holler at those who dare to expose the fantasies. Their turtle-minds retreat into ‘safe spaces’ when confronted with reality.

So, what did their fantasies lead to? Stuff like Defund the Police, resulting in manifold increases in dangerous spaces. Ideally, psychological safe space should be in sync with physical safe space, which was indeed the very basis of suburban expansion since the Sixties. Whites knew that moving away from blacks would make for safer neighborhoods. They knew it in their minds and saw it in the streets.
But over time, Jewish-controlled media filled white minds with false stories and symbols of the spiritual war between soulful blacks and soul-cold whites. So, blacks were always good and true, whites were always bad and false. Whatever the actual reality looked like in the schools and the streets, the media/academia insisted on the false dichotomy as the basis for the standard American view of race relations. Things have gotten even worse, as it’s always Groundhog Day with Emmett Till, as if American race relations are perpetually stuck in the 1950s, while brushing over all the cases of black-on-white violence that have grown to epidemic proportions with BLM’s effective knighting of black thuggery.

Under relentless indoctrination and pressure, even whites who’d taken flight from black blight came to regard Diversity and Blackness as holy while disparaging their own whiteness. So, instead of trying to defend and preserve their own nice communities, they chipped away at the foundations of their own physical well-being in subservience to the prescribed psychological safe space, the crib in which the Magic Negro resided rent-free.
Consider the white idiots in the suburbs who held rallies in honor of Fentanyl Floyd and invited blacks to wash their feet. But then, it’s fitting that the druggy Floyd has been ‘canonized’ by secular progs in search for new gods. In a way, psychological safe space is like addiction to opium. Someone sucking on an opium pipe is in his la-la land. He thinks he’s in heaven, and even though his habit is actually ruining his physical and material well-being, he prioritizes mental bliss over physical reality. Of course, it’s only a matter of time before the deteriorating reality breaks down the walls of one’s delusions(like the Chelsea Hotel fire in the film SID AND NANCY).

In the end, white people didn’t so much become individuals as EXTENSIONS of Jewish Power. Of course, most are too ignorant or stupid to have realized the direness of their condition. Granted, having been instilled with Jew-Worship, Homo-Mania, and Magic Negro Reverence, many probably feel good about themselves, like that pathetic excuse for a man, Will Stancil.
Not that most American ‘conservatives’ are much better, what with the likes of Ron DeSantis, Chris Christie, Mitt Romney, and Marco Rubio. They too are essentially Extensions of the Jewish Will.

Now, it’s natural to be an ‘extension’ given the social nature of man. The real question is of what. Of white identity/interests or Jewish identity/interests? It’s like the Bob Dylan’s song(during his Christian phase) called “Gotta Serve Somebody”. It could be the Devil or the Lord, but you gotta serve somebody. Ants on their own are nothing without the queen ant. But then, the queen ant would be nothing too but for the fact that all other ants are extensions of her key role in the order. They protect and feed her, and she produces the offspring that keeps the species alive.

In the case of slave-taking, the ants of one colony can be made to serve another. The raiding ants take the larvae of another colony, and the baby ants grow up to serve the colony of their captors. Of course, they don’t know it, even as they dutifully function as extensions of the colony that raided and/or destroyed their colony of origin.
Whites brought over black slaves to serve as Extensions of whites. Because whites were far more advanced, blacks(even as slaves) gained a good deal, but the fact remains that they were no longer serving their own kind but working for the white race. And even as a free people, blacks in the US military continue to serve as Extensions of the US Empire, now controlled by Jews who are most hellbent on Wars for Israel and Judaic Hegemony.

That said, if blacks knew that they were slaves because their subjugation was so visible and physical, most whites don’t know that they are essentially mental slaves of Jewish Massuhs(who use blacks, Diversity, and Antifa Janissary idiots as overseers to bully and intimidate the white masses). If whites enslaved blacks physically, Jews enslaved whites psychologically. Jews shylocked the white soul.
In a way, what Jews have done to whites is worse than what whites did to blacks. Despite their physical bondage, blacks were gifted with Christian souls. For all the backbreaking work, blacks learned that God is bigger than any number of white folks with guns & whips, and that Jesus, the Son of God, loves the wretched of the Earth, the poor, and the oppressed. So, even as whites shackled blacks physically, they freed black souls from the depths of jungle savagery. And in time, black Christians would embark on a spiritual as well as political struggle for freedom and dignity.

In contrast, Jewish Power used the media and academia to rob whites of their hearts and minds, their souls. Jews, the masters of psychology, devised the most effective methods of mind control. Within the corridors of white psyche, Jews placed all sorts of traps and poisons so that whites would feel nauseous at any thought of ‘white pride'(like Alex in A CLOCKWORK ORANGE) and nervous at any thought of offending Jews, blacks, and homos.
Jewish mind-control crept into the hearts of white goyim and convinced them that the essence of Christianity is the worship of sodomy and some Negro junkie named George Floyd.

Any man, however smart or strong he may be, is only so much on his own. He is just one person. He gains power by turning other men into extensions of himself. Their bodies serve as extensions of his mind, will, and vision. He is the will-to-power. Under Adolf Hitler, it was as if all Germans were extensions of the Fuhrer’s arms and legs. And under Mao, countless Chinese were carriers of his will. More Extensions means more Power.

Jewish Powerites can tolerate goyim only as extensions of their tribal will. There are many more Extensions than Extenders, just like there’s only one Sun but several planets in the Solar System. THE GODFATHER is not about individuals but about a handful of characters, Vito and Michael(and Barzini), who are Extenders while the rest are mostly Extensions or Buffers of one kind or another.

At one time, Jews rose up the ranks in the US as Extensions of WASP Power, but the tables were turned, and now WASPs serve as Extensions of Jewish Power. The difference is that even Jews-as-extensions had a powerful sense of who they were and looked to the day when they might rule.
In contrast, today’s WASP Extensions of Jews are truly a sorry and pathetic lot. They are without identity or pride, sappily servile as minions of Jews. They are like ants serving another colony without the slightest trepidation. They are ‘white uncle toms’ or ‘white toms’.
And if WASPs in the past thought it was rather uncouth to be overly ‘Anti-Semitic’, Jews today are utterly shameless and relentless in insulting, humiliating, and dehumanizing whites at every opportunity.

And what do whites react to all this? They on their knees and beg the Jews, “Can I suck your dic*?” At most, some whites will boast, “I sucked but didn’t swallow” as a point of pride. How utterly pathetic. In the movie MY BODYGUARD, the small kid is bullied by tougher kids and recruits a much bigger guy to serve as his Extension. Jews are nothing without their Extensions.

Ironically, white people are the most valuable extension of Jewish Power even as Jews employ Diversity as a bulwark against a possible White Awakening. Jews regard whites as the most indispensable but also the most dangerous horse that may throw off the Jewish rider and kick him in the skull and run off to be free. It’s no wonder that Jews use Diversity as added baggage on the horse to weigh it down. Of course, if Diversity serves as the straw that breaks the white horse’s back, Jews will end up with nothing. With whites, it’s a game of carrots and sticks. Carrots for the white ‘House Goyim’ who collaborate with the Jewish Massuh but sticks for the white ‘Field Goyim’ who refuse to pick cotton. (It’s like Leon Wieseltier’s formula for dealing with Muslims. Total ruthlessness OVER THERE where they pose a threat to Israel but kindness OVER HERE where they are part of the coalition against whites.)

Jews use Diversity against whites but worry that excessive anti-white bashing may lead to diminished white energies, in which case whites won’t be so useful as managers and foot-soldiers of the empire. In MY BODYGUARD, we naturally sympathize with the small kid because we don’t like bullies. We understand his recruitment of the big guy as an extension. But the kid is also a smart-ass and a jerk. A darker version of him is Sean Penn’s character of Davey Kleinfeld in CARLITO’S WAY. Kleinfeld is all brains and no brawn. He can get people to do all kinds of things for him. And yet, he is a crook and an arch-criminal in the making.

Over the years, many Americans have come to believe that Jews are the smartest, wisest, most decent, most judicious, and most understanding people on Earth, not least because of the Covenant and the Holocaust. Then, why not have Jews take over as the new ruling elites? Why not be guided by Jewish intellectuals, activists, and scholars? What better kind of elites could one hope for? Let the US be led by such wise-men and let the goyim accept their proper roles as eager Extensions of Jewish Power.

The problem with such a view is it misunderstands the nature of power. It may well be that there are wise, smart, and judicious Jews, but such people almost never gain power. Power almost always ends up with the cunning, devious, egotistical, ruthless, greedy, vain, nasty, vicious, corrupt, unscrupulous, and/or decrepit.
Indeed, the wisest Jews prefer truth to power, meaning they can never fill the power vacuum, which ends up being filled by power-mad Jews(like Victoria Nuland). What kind of Jews gained power? The likes of Norman Finkelstein(who, for all his faults, is sincere in trying to come to terms with the Palestinian issue) or a sleazebag like Chuck Schumer?
Therefore, Jewish domination didn’t lead to the rule by wise-men but by gangsters with law degrees. George Soros, Paul Singer, Mark Zuckerberg, and the like. The Question is, “Do you want to be an Extension of this Power, or do you want to cut free and become an Extension of the forces that defend, support, and preserve YOUR OWN race, culture, and history?” Choose the Proper Extensionism for yourself.